Developing rich GUI apps The Tapestry way

2006-11-21 Thread Šoltís Ján
Hello, I've developed a couple of Tapestry apps and now we have to develop an application with a rich gui in Java (SWING or SWT). I particularly like 'The Tapestry way' of developing the UI as opposed to the Struts, JSP or JSF way. What I like the most is the notion of high-level application c

Re: Developing rich GUI apps The Tapestry way

2006-11-21 Thread Bill Holloway
I've done both and tend toward straight Swing using, of course, gridbag layout with either Eclipse or Netbeans. The new "Matisse" layout manager from Netbeans is pretty nice -- almost drag and drop. Swing is OK, once you get used to the layout manager stuff. UI user events tie off nicely to back

Re: Developing rich GUI apps The Tapestry way

2006-11-21 Thread Konstantin Ignatyev
If you like declarative UI then I suggest you to look at http://www.swixml.org/ --- "pepone.onrez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ján > > maybe JGoodies is interesting for you take a look to > http://www.jgoodies.com/ > > I don't try it yet but use same applications > developed with it, I

Re: Developing rich GUI apps The Tapestry way

2006-11-21 Thread pepone . onrez
Hi Ján maybe JGoodies is interesting for you take a look to http://www.jgoodies.com/ I don't try it yet but use same applications developed with it, I preefer Qt-4 for reach Ui applications rather than Java . On 11/20/06, Šoltís Ján <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I've developed a couple of

Re: Developing rich GUI apps The Tapestry way

2006-11-21 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 11/20/06, pepone. onrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't try it yet but use same applications developed with it, I preefer Qt-4 for reach Ui applications rather than Java Then you should check out the new Qt4 java package. :) -- regards, Robin -

Re: Developing rich GUI apps The Tapestry way

2006-11-21 Thread pepone . onrez
I prefer c++ to java but this is other history ;) On 11/21/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/20/06, pepone. onrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't try it yet but use same applications developed with it, I > preefer Qt-4 for reach Ui applications rather than Java Then you