Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Geoff Callender
Here are some examples of handling Zone ids inside Loop: T5.4: http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart7/examples/ajax/eventlinksinaloop http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart7/examples/ajax/formsinaloop T5.3: http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/j

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Muhammad Gelbana
Fair enough. Thanks a lot for your replies. I appreciate it. *-* *Muhammad Gelbana* http://www.linkedin.com/in/mgelbana On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:54:59 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana > wrote:

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:54:59 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana wrote: So which beta has this fix ? :) Why don't you just pick the last one? :) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer http://machina.com.br ---

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Muhammad Gelbana
So which beta has this fix ? :) On Aug 12, 2014 5:50 PM, "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo" wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:43:36 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana > wrote: > > >>> ​What id? t:id or id? At least in the latest betas Zone does *not* add a >>> suffix when the id parameter is bound. >>> >> >> >>

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:43:36 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana wrote: ​What id? t:id or id? At least in the latest betas Zone does *not* add a suffix when the id parameter is bound. Perfect ! Which beta release does that ? Is this a valid maven repo for the beta versions ? https://repository.apa

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Muhammad Gelbana
> > ​What id? t:id or id? At least in the latest betas Zone does *not* add a > suffix when the id parameter is bound. Perfect ! Which beta release does that ? Is this a valid maven repo for the beta versions ? https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/tapestry/tapestry-core/

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:31:15 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana wrote: Yes I'm talking about the Zone component. But I've set an ID to the zone it's still appended with a suffix to assure uniqueness. What id? t:id or id? At least in the latest betas Zone does *not* add a suffix when the id parameter

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Muhammad Gelbana
...and there has been some time away from Tapestry, a few months now and then. But now I'm working on it again and I'm WAAAY behind schedule :( *-* *Muhammad Gelbana* http://www.linkedin.com/in/mgelbana On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Muhammad Gelbana wrote: > Yes I'm talk

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Muhammad Gelbana
Yes I'm talking about the Zone component. But I've set an ID to the zone it's still appended with a suffix to assure uniqueness. In this specific case, the zone was loaded using ajax. I've been checking the code of built-in mixins and I believe "RenderClientId" should force the zone to render the I

Re: Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-12 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:09:07 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana wrote: Why don't Tapestry allow developers to *optionally* assign client-side IDs to components before rendering them ? With every iteration in a loop and with every page render... What components are you talking about? Most component

Components ID generation suggestion

2014-08-11 Thread Muhammad Gelbana
Seems like client-side ID assignment is causing a lot of issues to new tapestry users including me. AFAIK, the purpose of having Tapestry generate client-side IDs, is to maintain a healthy application with unique client\server side IDs. So I have a suggestion.. Why don't Tapestry allow developers