Re: Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread Jim
Somehow I tuned out your CDATA discussion, sorry. Jim wrote: What about: ? Haven't touched T5 yet, but this is working for me in T4: This has the bonus of making (most of) the section syntax-highlighted. Jim Josh Canfield wrote: Neither approach really solves the problem all the way.

Re: Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread Jim
What about: ? Haven't touched T5 yet, but this is working for me in T4: This has the bonus of making (most of) the section syntax-highlighted. Jim Josh Canfield wrote: Neither approach really solves the problem all the way. They both require that the commented out section is valid code.

Re: Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread Josh Canfield
Neither approach really solves the problem all the way. They both require that the commented out section is valid code. Won't parse. It would be convenient to be able to mark a component as containing CDATA so that the template parser would leave it alone. for instance, if the above were equi

Re: Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread Jim
Would it be possible and within Tapestry's vision to give users the ability to annotate actual tags to designate them as server-side? In the spirit of being able to hand a Tapestry template to a web designer using Dreamweaver, the syntax-highlighting would be value-added. Otherwise, there'd

Re: Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
You can "simulate" a comment directive as a component: public class Comment { boolean setupRender() { return false; } } This is a no-op component, it skips directly from the SetupRender phase to the CleanupRender phase, rendering nothing. This is even less work than . On Fri, Apr 11, 2008

Re: Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread nicholas Krul
Good to know that it works, but I would think thats a little dangerous... If its not commented, I always assume its live code. There should be a way to comment properly. I can do it in the jsps I stare at all day long... I'd think it reasonable T5 does real comments. *I haven't tested any of thi

Re: Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread Jim
That's perfect, thanks Josh. Josh Canfield wrote: How about just doing whatever the equivalent to is in T4? On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a way to do server-side commenting, ala <%-- --> in JSPs? i.e. to comment sections that you (temporarily) d

Re: Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread Josh Canfield
How about just doing whatever the equivalent to is in T4? On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to do server-side commenting, ala <%-- --> in JSPs? i.e. to > comment sections that you (temporarily) don't wish to be dynamically > processed server-side?

Commenting templates

2008-04-11 Thread Jim
Is there a way to do server-side commenting, ala <%-- --> in JSPs? i.e. to comment sections that you (temporarily) don't wish to be dynamically processed server-side? Adding only precludes client-side processing, of course, and if I try to surround a template section (which contains Tapestry