Geez those guys are such ass clowns.
I wonder what the average kind of shop is that employs JSF engineers
anyways? A factory of internal one off app developers? (not that
internal apps are bad)
Searching on dice.com shows lots of "eh" employers for JSF while under
Tapestry I see fun looking
If you take a closer look at the comments you'll see that JSF isn't all
that hot after all, and the way the author came up with the numbers is
questionable at best, so there's really nothing to see here.
-Filip
kranga skrev:
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html
Tapestry, despite
Or if you want to get anything done, you need A LOT of programmers.
Mark J. Stang
Software Engineer
office: +1 303.468.2900
Ping Identity
-Original Message-
From: kranga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 9/7/2007 2:14 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Comment about Tapestry's g
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html
Tapestry, despite being a strong competitor to JSF, has gone virtually no
where. once it is experienced its initial growth spurt after being released.
It's basically flat. Unlike the Ruby on Rails vs. Spring data, the data at
dice.com seems to
