te antworten an
"Tapestry users"
An
users@tapestry.apache.org
Kopie
Thema
Re: ApplicationState annotation problem since 5.0.11
Hi
Thank you for your quick answer.
If I understand well, I have to create a custom
ApplicationStateContribution
to handle ApplicationState on String class ?
> "Tapestry users"
>
>
> An
> users@tapestry.apache.org
> Kopie
>
> Thema
> Re: ApplicationState annotation problem since 5.0.11
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> Thank you for your quick answer.
>
> If I understand wel
,
kris
Baptiste Meurant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
18.03.2008 12:18
Bitte antworten an
"Tapestry users"
An
users@tapestry.apache.org
Kopie
Thema
Re: ApplicationState annotation problem since 5.0.11
Hi
Thank you for your quick answer.
If I understand well, I have to
[], int, int, int) (at null:-1) (for service
>> 'ApplicationStateManager'): No service implements the interface [B.
>>
>> When I delete @ApplicationState annotation, everything works.
>>
>> I have made some tests on different Tapestry versions and it seems
Alec Leamas a écrit :
Hi!
What are you really trying to do here? For me, this looks like a typo.
Have you contributed an ApplicationStateObject? Then you need to refer
to this. I'm pretty sure Tapestry doen't have a String
ApplicationState object in place...
I would expect something like
@A
Hi!
What are you really trying to do here? For me, this looks like a typo.
Have you contributed an ApplicationStateObject? Then you need to refer
to this. I'm pretty sure Tapestry doen't have a String ApplicationState
object in place...
I would expect something like
@ApplicationState
private
implementation has changed since 5.0.11 ?
In this case can someone give me the correct configuration ?
Thanks, regards,
Baptiste Meurant
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ApplicationState-annotation-problem-since-5.0.11-tp16118051p16118051.html
Sent f
