Re: Alternative for Shell parameter parseWidgets

2007-03-05 Thread Markus Joschko
I had the same issue where I wanted dojo components on only one page. I actually thought it might be possible to have a ajaxdelegatecomponent and overwrite it in this special page. But before trying this I simply inserted a

Re: Alternative for Shell parameter parseWidgets

2007-03-05 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
On second thought that makes it sound like a bad component somehow. It's not that at all. I'm actually jealous of the more liberal freedom enjoyed in Tacos land..It's a good component, just too precarious for tap core. On 3/6/07, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No that's my fault. I ban

Re: Alternative for Shell parameter parseWidgets

2007-03-05 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
No that's my fault. I banished it from core because I was worried it would behave unexpectedly (a worry seen to be true by the jira issues created from it existing in Tacos alone) and cause too many overall headaches... If I can help it it will never see the light of day in core. :) On 3/2/07, D

Re: Alternative for Shell parameter parseWidgets

2007-03-02 Thread Diego
Thanks Andy, That looks good, I will update to Tacos 4.1.1. I have seen that some tapestry dojo components moved to tapestry and back. But wouldn't DojoWidget or Widget belong in Tapestry core, because its a really generic component? Regards Diego On 3/1/07, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Alternative for Shell parameter parseWidgets

2007-03-01 Thread andyhot
http://tacos.sourceforge.net/tacos4.1/tacos-core/tapdoc/index.html http://tacos.sourceforge.net/tacos4.1/tacos-core/quick-start/downloading.html Take a look at the dojo:Widget component Diego wrote: Is there a alternative way of using dojo Widgets in tapestry 4.1.1. If I don't set parseWidget

Alternative for Shell parameter parseWidgets

2007-03-01 Thread Diego
Is there a alternative way of using dojo Widgets in tapestry 4.1.1. If I don't set parseWidgets = "true", then the widgets aren't parsed. But the text of the Shell says: ". It is highly reccomended that you keep this at its default value of false." Regards, Diego