Re: A document must have exactly one root element exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade.

2009-04-17 Thread zack1403
: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-document-must-have-exactly-one-root-element-exception-on-5.1.0.2-upgrade.-tp23014335p23104665.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Re: A document must have exactly one root element exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade.

2009-04-15 Thread nille hammer
retty sure you have used the html-tag twice. (That´s what I guess from the error message). Regards, nillehammer -- http://www.winfonet.eu - original Nachricht Betreff: Re: A document must have exactly one root element exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade. Gesendet: Mi, 15. Apr 2009 Von

Re: A document must have exactly one root element exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade.

2009-04-14 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:20 PM, zack1403 wrote: > > Anyone have a thought on this? I have no idea where to go from here. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/A-document-must-have-exactly-one-root-el

Re: A document must have exactly one root element exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade.

2009-04-14 Thread zack1403
Anyone have a thought on this? I have no idea where to go from here. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-document-must-have-exactly-one-root-element-exception-on-5.1.0.2-upgrade.-tp23014335p23049185.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

A document must have exactly one root element exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade.

2009-04-12 Thread zack1403
. Exception is on the 'writer.element("li")' line in beforeRenderBody. Here is the component source: http://pastebin.com/m16768df7 Thanks! Zack -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-document-must-have-exactly-one-root-element-exception-on-5.1.0.2-upgrade.