Wow, This is the day I've waiting for.
Nice :)
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
>
> - Keep backwards compatibility to Tapestry 5.2
> What I'm proposing is a gradual transition, over Tapestry 5.3 and 5.4,
> where new, documented, stable JavaScript APIs are introduced. and
> Tapestry and 3rd party lib
Great News.
2011/3/18 jqzone
> That great!
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Howard wrote:
>
> > I've always had a love/hate relationship with JavaScript; some of the
> > earliest motivations for Tapestry was to "encapsulate that ugly
> > JavaScript stuff so I don't have to worry about it ag
That great!
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Howard wrote:
> I've always had a love/hate relationship with JavaScript; some of the
> earliest motivations for Tapestry was to "encapsulate that ugly
> JavaScript stuff so I don't have to worry about it again." However, as
> I've come to appreciate
I've always had a love/hate relationship with JavaScript; some of the
earliest motivations for Tapestry was to "encapsulate that ugly
JavaScript stuff so I don't have to worry about it again." However, as
I've come to appreciate JavaScript, over time, as a powerful functional
language, and not as a
