Yeah the RadioGroup/Radio stuff enforces the containment pretty
strictly currently - but as there is no actual notion of an actual
RadioGroup element in html it may make sense to re-think this logic.
An parameter referencing the RadioGroup to use for Radio options might
make sense.
It's too late t
Hey,
you're right, I didn't notice you were talking about merging visually two
radio groups. Sorry.
I think the easiest way to solve this might be some kind of HTML/CSS trick.
If you really need the two RadioGroup2 options to the right, the trivial
thing would be changing the layout of the table,
Hi Dario,
That only works if there's only one RadioGroup, the problem is that the
first RadioGroup needs to refer only to the first column of Radios in
the table, whilst the second needs to refer only to the second column.
Since Radios have to be inside RadioGroups and RadioGroups can't be
ne
Hi Andrew,
if you start the RadioGroup in an "invisible" spot, it will render
correctly, as in
or at least that's the case with lightly formatted tables...
Regards,
Dario
On Feb 5, 2008 7:54 AM, Andrew Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to use ra
I'm trying to use radio options in the following way:
pseudo-html:
This doesn't work with Tapestry's RadioGroup component because there's
no way of wrapping a RadioGroup around the related radio fields without
wrapping the other.
I tried the obvious approach of overriding Radio to a
