Thanks Andy,
really appreciate your work. Yes, that's sort of what I assumed. For the
time being using the 0.7.0-SNAPSHOT from erinors, declaring the dependencies
in dependencyManagement and running it separately works for me.
Kalle
On 9/30/07, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 0.7.0-SNAPS
0.7.0-SNAPSHOT from
http://www.erinors.com/developer/maven2/com/erinors/tapestry/tapdoc-maven-plugin/0.7.0-SNAPSHOT
has been copied to
https://tacos.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/tacos/tacos-4.1/trunk/tapdoc
and it already has some tweaks - you can easily build it from there and use it
the
way
Hey Andy,
you mentioned that tapdoc is merging with Tacos. Where's the snapshot repo
for tapdoc and which version should/could people be using? There's only
0.6.5-SNAPSHOT in Tacos nightly at:
http://tacos.sourceforge.net/nightly/and the latest
0.7.0-SNAPSHOT at
http://www.erinors.com/developer/ma
As a sidenote; the latest HTMLunit understands even Dojo's Javascript quite
fine.
Kalle
On 9/8/07, Renat Zubairov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My last question was a bit stupid one, it is actually working (just
> tried it on the demo). That's really great, that I wouldn't need to
> redo all my
My last question was a bit stupid one, it is actually working (just
tried it on the demo). That's really great, that I wouldn't need to
redo all my HTTPUnit based automated acceptance tests that do not
understand Javascript.
:)
Thanks!
Renat
On 08/09/07, Renat Zubairov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
well... i dont know ;)
you try... http://lombok.demon.co.uk/tacosDemo41/forms/Tree.html
Renat Zubairov wrote:
Great, thank you very much for the information. I'm eager to try to
port my old T4.0 contrib:Tree to the new Tacos tree.
BTW will it also work when javascript is not available?
Renat
Great, thank you very much for the information. I'm eager to try to
port my old T4.0 contrib:Tree to the new Tacos tree.
BTW will it also work when javascript is not available?
Renat
On 08/09/07, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Renat Zubairov wrote:
> > Actually I'm quite glad that it is not
Renat Zubairov wrote:
Actually I'm quite glad that it is not a Dojo tree because in my
opinion it's too heavy for my simple usecases.
I think that was Jesse's opinion as well :)
What is required tapestry version for Tacos 4.1?
The idea is that each tacos 4.1 release will support the la
Actually I'm quite glad that it is not a Dojo tree because in my
opinion it's too heavy for my simple usecases.
What is required tapestry version for Tacos 4.1?
Renat
On 08/09/07, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Renat, i dont remember ever it being the dojo tree... even in the
> previous ver
Renat, i dont remember ever it being the dojo tree... even in the
previous versions.
It's just a combination of css and (Ajax)DirectLinks updating the
correct segment.
That said, i'm curious if dojo's tree can now be constructed using the
dojo:Widget component
Renat Zubairov wrote:
Interesti
Interesting, you are no longer using Dojo for tree? Tree is not in
Dojo part of the demo anymore. What kind of tree is used right now?
Renat
On 07/09/2007, Shing Hing Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have deployed the Tacos Demo 4.1.1 on my server at
>
> http://lombok.demon.co.uk/tacosDemo41/ap
I have deployed the Tacos Demo 4.1.1 on my server at
http://lombok.demon.co.uk/tacosDemo41/app
Shing
--- andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should grab this opportunity in order to also
> thank Shing Hing Man for
> his contributions...
>
> Thx Shing!
>
> Martino Piccinato wrote:
> > It
I should grab this opportunity in order to also thank Shing Hing Man for
his contributions...
Thx Shing!
Martino Piccinato wrote:
It's working perfectly. Thanks again for tacos, I think tapestry isn't
really complete without it. The new DojoWidget component is great :-)
On 9/6/07, Igor Drobi
It's working perfectly. Thanks again for tacos, I think tapestry isn't
really complete without it. The new DojoWidget component is great :-)
On 9/6/07, Igor Drobiazko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/6/07, Martino Piccinato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > have you tested DojoWidget with m
On 9/6/07, Martino Piccinato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> have you tested DojoWidget with menus?
DojoWidget was tested with examples in the demo application. Please explore
the demo app.
Do you mean dojo.widget.Menu2? There is no example for this widget.
You can try it out and report bugs, if
Martino Piccinato wrote:
> It's really impressive, especially the DojoWidget component! Thanks
> for the great work.
>
> I have a few questions:
>
> why using script.acuous.us and not dojo for Draggable and Droppable?
>
For dojo dnd, there's the DropTarget component - see the related
component
It's really impressive, especially the DojoWidget component! Thanks
for the great work.
I have a few questions:
why using script.acuous.us and not dojo for Draggable and Droppable?
have you tested DojoWidget with menus?
and, finally, just to be sure: DojoWidget do not require "parseWidget"
shell
Hi all,
It's a pleasure for me to announce the release of Tacos 4.1.0
(http://tacos.sourceforge.net/tacos4.1/) - the first stable tacos
release supporting Tapestry 4.1.x and offering:
* Dojo Widget - Generic component for (almost) all dojo widgets.
* script.aculo.us - brand new components b
18 matches
Mail list logo
