I can't believe I did this to my self !!
I was using a wrong annotationJDO's @Persistent
javax.jdo.annotations.Persistent
*-*
*Muhammad Gelbana*
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mgelbana
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Muhammad Gelbana
wrote:
> I'm using v5.4-beta-17 and I
I'm using v5.4-beta-17 and I'm facing an issue.
I have an object persisted using the @Persistent annotation.
And then I have a Select component on the page. While handling the Select
component's VALUE_CHANGED event method, it seems I can't access the
persisted object, its always null although I'v
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 04:44:04 -0300, Geoff Callender
wrote:
By returning "this" you're doing a page refresh, which is an HTTP 302
redirect, instead of an AJAX response.
So never return "this" in an event handler method unless you're really
sure you want to force a full page refresh, and i
Exactly. I was thinking of a *submit*. But now that I thought about it, a
submit may not be needed. But I tend prefer having every possible option
available for me to handle whatever scenario I may face. I'll go with the
ajax option. Thank you.
*-*
*Muhammad Gelbana*
http://www
Sorry, that sounds very odd to me. "refresh the page without refreshing it"
sounds like a contradiction!
Your Select has made an AJAX request. Why wouldn't you want an AJAX response,
ie. a partial render? If you return the whole page then any other changes on
the client-side will be overwritten
Its ok to use Ajax, but is it the only way to update the page after a
value is changed in a Select component ? If yes, wouldn't it be an
improvement to be able to refresh the page without refreshing it and
losing its state ?
*-*
*Muhammad Gelbana*
http://www.linkedin.com/in/m
By returning "this" you're doing a page refresh, which is an HTTP 302 redirect,
instead of an AJAX response.
The redirect causes the browser to issue a second request - a fresh page
request - which will be freshly rendered by your stateless page class without
any knowledge of the value you set
I hope I selected a valid subject !
When I handle a VALUE_CHANGED event for a Select component. I receive the
current value for the Select component as an event handler method parameter.
I use this parameter to set a member variable in the page's class.
@OnEvent(component = "parameterType", valu
ed services wouldn't work in a
PerThread Scope?
That's a different question and the answer is that they will work.
Services won't stop working because they're being injected in a service
with a given scope. Tapestry-IoC takes care of the scope and you can mix
and match
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When your service has state (injected services doesn't count) which is per
> thread.
>
> Just to clarify, are you saying Injected services wouldn't work in a
PerThread Scope?
threading. I'm
confused as for when I should be using the PERTHREAD scope.
If your service has state and it (the state) should be the same for more
than one thread (in your case, the lock), it cannot be per thread,
otherwise you'd had one lock per thread, which would be useless
Hello I'm looking to build a service where I would be Injecting a hibernate
session as well as synchronizing a few methods for multi threading. I'm
confused as for when I should be using the PERTHREAD scope.
Scope(ScopeContants.PERTHREAD)
public class MyServiceImpl.class implements
even got a small test-app
running without problems so far. Great job!
Am 30.11.2012 um 18:52 schrieb Howard Lewis Ship:
> Per-thread scope means to create a new implementation, via the builder
> method, once for every request: buldUserCacheSupport() is invoked the first
> time any
Per-thread scope means to create a new implementation, via the builder
method, once for every request: buldUserCacheSupport() is invoked the first
time any method of UserCacheSupport is invoked.
EnvironmentalBuilder creates a proxy class and instance, and is intended to
only be invoked once per
Hi everone,
today I found the reason for a recent memory leak and I thought I'd ask what
you think of it:
Rather by accident I annotated one of the EnvironmentalShadowBuilder-methods
with @Scope(PERTHREAD)
@Scope(ScopeConstants.PERTHREAD)
public UserCacheSupport buildUserCacheSu
Gratefully wondering if someone could validate my hunches about Tapestry.
By way of background, I've got a Tapestry app that manages some training
data for a machine learning process. The training process is time
consuming, so I want to do that outside of the request/response cycle.
I intend to
application to be regurlarily saturated.
> Otherwise, keep your eyes on your database queries and let the rest
> shake out.
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Juan E. Maya wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> first of all i am very glad to go back to work with T5 :) I was
>
the rest
shake out.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Juan E. Maya wrote:
> Hello,
>
> first of all i am very glad to go back to work with T5 :) I was
> missing the mailing list. :)
>
> I know the PerThread scope service are created per request, but i
> don't want the obj
Hello,
first of all i am very glad to go back to work with T5 :) I was
missing the mailing list. :)
I know the PerThread scope service are created per request, but i
don't want the object to be created for every asset that is loaded, i
only needed for the PageRender cycle.
Is there a w
;m
>> converting a tapestry4/spring application to tapestry5 and I'm trying to
>> leave spring behind. As a spring bean this object was simply declared with
>> scope="prototype" which gave me a new instance of the object every time I
>> accessed it.
>
> Tapest
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:28:06 -0300, Tony Nelson
wrote:
This particular service could have just as easily been a pojo. I'm
converting a tapestry4/spring application to tapestry5 and I'm trying to
leave spring behind. As a spring bean this object was simply declared
This particular service could have just as easily been a pojo. I'm converting
a tapestry4/spring application to tapestry5 and I'm trying to leave spring
behind. As a spring bean this object was simply declared with
scope="prototype" which gave me a new instance of the
Hi,
you can inject ObjectLocator and call 'autobuild' to create a new instance
when needed. So instead of
@Inject private MyService myService;
...
myService.doSomething();
you would have
@Inject private ObjectLocator locator;
locator.autobuild(MyService.class).doSomething().
However I am
I have a service, that I need a new instance of every time it is referenced.
In ScopeConstants I see DEFAULT, and PERTHREAD. I really need a new instance
every time I request this particular service because it saves state, and yes,
there are some occasions where I need several of these in the
n the java code and avoid them in
> the tml, but that is a question of taste).
>
>
> -
> http://www.winfonet.eu
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/component-scope-service-with-injecte
return this.myService.doSomethingUseful(this.myObject, this.messages);
}
In your tml:
(I try to do method calls with parameters in the java code and avoid them in
the tml, but that is a question of taste).
-
http://www.winfonet.eu
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/component
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:53:00 -0300, Paul Stanton
wrote:
just injecting messages didn't work when i tried it.
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: No service implements the
interface org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.Messages.
Maybe a 'service' isn't what I'm after,
Messages isn't a service. It
additional) parameter to your service method. (This is sometimes
referred to as method-Injection, a misleading term in my humble opinion).
-
http://www.winfonet.eu
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/component-scope-service-with-injected-messages-tp4724993p47
ext:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/component-scope-service-with-injected-messages-tp4724993p4748239.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apac
he Messages within the service methods.
-
http://www.winfonet.eu
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/component-scope-service-with-injected-messages-tp4724993p4730146.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mail
to define your service methods with an additional Messages
> parameter. This way you can use the Messages within the service methods.
>
> -
> http://www.winfonet.eu
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/component-scope-servic
The easiest way is to define your service methods with an additional Messages
parameter. This way you can use the Messages within the service methods.
-
http://www.winfonet.eu
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/component-scope-service-with-injected
Hi all,
I am aware that there is something special about tapestry
services/resources such as Request, Messages etc which are only
available in the context of a component render.
I need to create a service which makes heavy use of the messages store
and is available only in the scope of a
Thanks Robert
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Application-Scope-tp3246646p4716851.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Application-Scope-tp3246646p4716830.html
> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
&
Is there any examples on how to create my own service?
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Application-Scope-tp3246646p4716830.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:47:10 -0300, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov
wrote:
did i get you right, that i can simply inject ObjectLocator service to my
Quartz JobFactory and instantiate jobs via autobuild()
I mean sources saying all dependencies will be injected.
Yes. JavaDoc: Autobuilds a class by findin
The proxy you get back from
> a direct or indrect call to getService() is always global, though in
> the case of the perthread scope, that core service implementation is
> ... another proxy that manages and delegates to the per-thread
> instance.
>
> I think you need to use an ex
Unfortunately, Tapestry is not Spring :-) The proxy you get back from
a direct or indrect call to getService() is always global, though in
the case of the perthread scope, that core service implementation is
... another proxy that manages and delegates to the per-thread
instance.
I think you
iag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:47:23 -0300, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <
> dvsekhval...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>>
>
> Hi!
>
>
>is it possible to have services bound with Bean scope? I'm using Quartz
>> scheduler and my jobs are act
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:47:23 -0300, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov
wrote:
Hi all,
Hi!
is it possible to have services bound with Bean scope? I'm using
Quartz scheduler and my jobs are actually services bound in AppModule
with all
dependency injection and so on.
But i want diff
Hi all,
is it possible to have services bound with Bean scope? I'm using Quartz
scheduler and my jobs are actually services bound in AppModule with all
dependency injection and so on.
But i want different instances of jobs. So every time i call
ServiceResources:getSe
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:40:54 -0300, rektide
wrote:
At present, I'm trying to build a MethodAdvice implementation that
modifies the behavior of a PerThread Scope'd service.
The fact that your service has perthread scope shouldn't change anything.
The MethodAdvice need
Hello everyone. I'm new here, so let me just say hello. I'm rektide, I've
been using
Tapestry 5.1 since July 2010. Been mostly great, with the main caveat being
trying to
figure out how to coax my app into having enough context when I run Ajax
requests. The
component model is awesome, the IO
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:46:57 -0200, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Not build-in but you can write yourself some singleton service around a
hashmap or something.
I'd like to add that Tapestry never had an application scope.
ApplicationState was renamend to SessionState exactly to prevent this
One solution is to implement your own tapestry service for this.
BR
Mats
Stephan Windmüller skrev 2010-11-02 13:36:
Hi!
Since the ApplicationState annotation has been renamed to SessionState,
I am wondering if there is a usable Application scope in Tapestry where
I can store data globally
Not build-in but you can write yourself some singleton service around a hashmap
or something.
Uli
On 02.11.2010 13:36, Stephan Windmüller wrote:
Hi!
Since the ApplicationState annotation has been renamed to SessionState,
I am wondering if there is a usable Application scope in Tapestry where
Hi!
Since the ApplicationState annotation has been renamed to SessionState,
I am wondering if there is a usable Application scope in Tapestry where
I can store data globally for the application?
TIA
Stephan
-
To unsubscribe, e
Thank you Martin!
2010/5/30 Martin Strand
> If you want to declare a global function from within Tapestry.onDOMLoaded,
> you can simply add it to the windows object:
>
> window.myGlobalFunction = function() {
> doCoolStuff();
> }
>
> You can then access that function from anywhere if you pref
If you want to declare a global function from within Tapestry.onDOMLoaded, you
can simply add it to the windows object:
window.myGlobalFunction = function() {
doCoolStuff();
}
You can then access that function from anywhere if you prefer to do things this
way:
Martin
On Sun, 30 May 2010
Hi Thiago,
When the Tapestry creates the script.
It puts the script inside a other method.
Tapestry.onDOMLoaded() in this case.
So when I try call it method using a js the method created by RenderSupport
is not visible for js.
I resolved the following
writer.element("script", "language", "Ja
On Sat, 29 May 2010 23:18:28 -0300, Pablo dos Reis
wrote:
When I inject javaScript using renderSupport not is possible access the
methods created in the class through a js file.
Hi, Pablo!
I'm not sure what you're talking about, but remember that any JavaScript
code added through RenderS
When I inject javaScript using renderSupport not is possible access the
methods created in the class through a js file.
Are there a way for access a JavaScript method overrided using renderSupport
for a classe outside it, in the js for exemple ?
--
Pablo Henrique dos Reis
tion process that would let me do
> it. I do have another ingenious idea though :-)
>
> Paul
>
> Inge Solvoll wrote on 23/02/2010 12:51:18:
>
> > That's what I'm already doing. This time I wanted to test that the
> perthread
> > scope of my service wor
nctionality for Testify, but there
are no easy hooks into the registry creation process that would let me do
it. I do have another ingenious idea though :-)
Paul
Inge Solvoll wrote on 23/02/2010 12:51:18:
> That's what I'm already doing. This time I wanted to test that the
per
That's what I'm already doing. This time I wanted to test that the perthread
scope of my service worked like it should, that's why I need to do an
integration test with a real live registry.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Paul Field wrote:
> Hi Inge,
>
> Testify do
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:17:35 +0100, Ulrich Stärk
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Querying the registry for the same service from different threads
> >>> should yield different instances
> >>> when
t;
> On 17.02.2010 23:32 schrieb Martin Strand:
>
> Hmm, why different instances? Wouldn't every thread see the same proxy
>> instance?
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:17:35 +0100, Ulrich Stärk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Querying the registr
10 12:17:35 +0100, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Querying the registry for the same service from different threads
should yield different instances
when using the perthread scope. Just test that. No need for a request
if your service doesn't
require one.
Uli
On 17.02.2010 11:42 schrieb Inge Solvol
Hmm, why different instances? Wouldn't every thread see the same proxy instance?
Martin
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:17:35 +0100, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Querying the registry for the same service from different threads should yield
different instances
when using the perthread scope. Just test
erent instances when using the perthread scope. Just test that. No
need for a request if your service doesn't require one.
Uli
On 17.02.2010 11:42 schrieb Inge Solvoll:
Hi!
I recently encountered a bug in one of my services, where it had the wrong
scope because I put the scope annotation on the
ly in my test
superclass so all tests use the same registry instance.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Querying the registry for the same service from different threads should
> yield different instances when using the perthread scope. Just test that. No
> need fo
Querying the registry for the same service from different threads should yield different instances
when using the perthread scope. Just test that. No need for a request if your service doesn't
require one.
Uli
On 17.02.2010 11:42 schrieb Inge Solvoll:
Hi!
I recently encountered a bug i
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:42:38 -0200, Inge Solvoll
wrote:
Hi!
Hi!
But how can I test
"perthread" scope on services in the test registry when there are no real
requests? I'm assuming this requires mocking the Request object in some
way?
Only if your service or some of i
Hi!
I recently encountered a bug in one of my services, where it had the wrong
scope because I put the scope annotation on the interface rather than on the
implementing class. I got the idea that I could manually create a T5 IOC
registry to do integration testing on my services. But how can I
Well, actually it does compile - if the class is written in Groovy. :-) Have
to investigate this further. Anyway, I now understand that @Scope is allowed
on a service implementation class, but not on its fields. Thanks for the
clarification!
Cheers,
Peter
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote
Hi!
The @Scope can't be used in fields: it wouldn't compile (@Scope is
defined with @Target(value={TYPE,METHOD})). In addition, each service
has only one scope, defined in its builder method. From
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-ioc/service.html:
"Each service has a
I'm using Registry.get(Class, AnnotationProvider) to find matching services
for fields of an object that is not under Tapestry's control. Everything
works fine, except that annotating a field with @Scope("myOwnScope") has no
effect. Is this a bug? If not, what can I do to o
> init the Tap5 application? Also, is it possible to have those services
> declared in application scope? For instance, i wanted the application to
> constantly check for incoming sms from mobile connected via javacomm.
>
> And also, I was looking at the ajax documentation. It didn&#
absolutely. Have a look at the tapestry-ioc documentation.
Also, is it possible to have those services
declared in application scope? For instance, i wanted the application to
constantly check for incoming sms from mobile connected via javacomm.
I'd do that with the help of quartz. The third-
have those services
declared in application scope? For instance, i wanted the application to
constantly check for incoming sms from mobile connected via javacomm.
And also, I was looking at the ajax documentation. It didn't state whether
if the ajax supported is secured or not. I only wanted authen
your reply. But it seems not a correct solution. I just got
the same result with the statement added.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-tapestry-ioc-scope-problem-in-a-standalone-program-tp19405294p19428352.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mail
ry users"
An
users@tapestry.apache.org
Kopie
Thema
T5: tapestry-ioc scope problem in a standalone program
Hello, every one. I met the following problem when trying to use
tapestry-ioc
in a standalone program. According to the tapestry official site, a
service
builder method should
Hello, every one. I met the following problem when trying to use tapestry-ioc
in a standalone program. According to the tapestry official site, a service
builder method should be invoked multiple times, if it is annotated with
@Scope("perthread") and the service is used in multi thr
How can i instanciate an Application Object?
@ApplicationState
private MyObject objectName_;
how i use a request
@Inject
private RequestGlobals requestGlobals_;
Then you have access to the Servlet API with things like:
HttpServletRequest request = requestGlobals.getHTTPServletRequest();
Gi
On 10/23/07, Gianluigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only a question, how i use a request or a Session in Tapestry 5? How can i
> instanciate an
> Application Object?
>
> in JSP i wrote : HttpSession session and session.setProperty("Key");
> and in Tapestry 5?
Take a look at application state:
h
Hi to all, i'm a JSP developer and i want to know a more on Tapestry 5, it seem
very cool! :)
Only a question, how i use a request or a Session in Tapestry 5? How can i
instanciate an
Application Object?
in JSP i wrote : HttpSession session and session.setProperty("Key");
and in Tapestry 5?
On 9/17/07, Davor Hrg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that you must give action link something
> to identify your object.
>
> in the page you mentioned you have only one instance of
> the MatchInfo component that get's rendered multiple times with different
> data.
> So when your action
The problem is that you must give action link something
to identify your object.
in the page you mentioned you have only one instance of
the MatchInfo component that get's rendered multiple times with different
data.
So when your action is called, you have the last element passed as
parameter.
yo
On 9/17/07, Francois Armand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure that I understand what you do correctly, may you
> provide the actual code ?
> As far as I can tell, you persists a field that is used as value for the
> loop, and so it's always the last MacthInfo that is persists.
>
> You
Charles Mason wrote:
Hi All
[..]
Hi,
[..] The
method called by the action link uses the persistent field which
stores the actual Match object which the component gets data from.
However when ever I use the page and click the action link, its as
though the action link is clicked on the last
Hi All
I am currently experiencing a problem which seems to contradict the
model of how action link works.
I have a page called start.html. It has a for loop which for every
iteration contains a custom component, called MatchInfo. This renders
a box containing the info about the match. MatchInfo
Hello,
I've the following need
I've a component that have a parameter that it's not necessarly bound to
session scope.
Is there a way to ma it bound to session whan managed by the component.
i.e. I'd like this parameter to be boud to a property of the component that
is session scoped.
kiuma
Details
>> >> >> >> 123-ABC123 -Link to ItemDetails (OrderId is passed
>> as
>> >> >> >> parameter)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> ItemList Page Displays:
>> >> >> >>
gt;> >> In OrderListPage.java:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In viewItems() method:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ItemListPage nextPage = (ItemListPage ) cycle
>> >> >> .getPage("It
>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In OrderListPage.java:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In viewItems() method:
>> >> >>
>> >> &
;
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In ItemListPage.java: I am persisting the order object.
>> >>
>> >> @Persist("session")
>> >> public abstract void setOrder(Order order);
>> >> public a
va: I am persisting the order object.
>> >>
>> >> @Persist("session")
>> >> public abstract void setOrder(Order order);
>> >> public abstract Order getOrder();
>> >>
>> >> In ItemForm.java: I am persisting the orde
; @Persist("session")
>> public abstract void setOrder(Order order);
>> public abstract Order getOrder();
>>
>>
>> When I am saving Item, getOrder() is returning null. This value exists
>> when
>> I navigate to new Item Page. But it is getting lost wh
sisted object in the previous page).
>>
>> @Persist("session")
>> public abstract void setOrder(Order order);
>> public abstract Order getOrder();
>>
>>
>> When I am saving Item, getOrder() is returnin
mForm.java.
Please help...
Thanks in advance...
-Sri
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Persisted-Object-with-session-scope-is-getting-lost-between-the-pages.-tf3490484.html#a9747985
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e exists when
I navigate to new Item Page. But it is getting lost while accessing save
method in ItemForm.java.
Please help...
Thanks in advance...
-Sri
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Persisted-Object-with-session-scope-is-getting-lost-between-the-pages.-tf3490484.ht
I think what you need is an initialize-method. setConfig cannot be
called before the Manager constructor. See
http://hivemind.apache.org/hivemind1/hivemind/BuilderFactory.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addi
application scope ASO (Application State Object). This
* class is instantiated lazily - when first page injects it.
*/
public Manager() {
logger.info("config: " + config); // <<<<<< THIS IS NULL
String address = config.getString("person.
Hello,
can someone provide some code hints to Hivemind and Spring newb - that would
be me - on how to inject
1. Hivemind service into application scope ASO
2. Spring service into application scope ASO
I want to cache some long term objects in the global ASO, but want (if it is
at all
Thanks Ben,
That's what I did and it works great !
Best regards,
D.
2007/1/4, Ben Dotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Crap.. I forgot about that dependency on the web request. That never
made sense to me for the case of application-scope ASOs.
In any case, here is a wild idea. If you can
that implements
> ServletContextListener.
> In the method public void
> contextDestroyed(ServletContextEvent event),
> I need to retrieve an Application State Object (ASO)
> of tapestry 4
> with an application scope (not session).
>
> My question is how to retrieve an Appli
Crap.. I forgot about that dependency on the web request. That never
made sense to me for the case of application-scope ASOs.
In any case, here is a wild idea. If you can capture and hold onto the
Hivemind-created instance of the ASO, you could then give out access to
it through a static getter
ateObject" is the name of your ASO.
>
> HTH
>
> Ben
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tapestry User List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:45 AM
> To: tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: how to retrieve an Application St
nager.class)).get("myStateObject");
>
> Where "myStateObject" is the name of your ASO.
>
> HTH
>
> Ben
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tapestry User List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:45 AM
> To: tapestry-
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
