tap5: how to response without tap template (redefine output stream)

i know this is simple question.. i read about this somewhere in tap5 docks.. but i dont remember where. i want to redefine output strem for concrete page (return not tap template, but simple text for example or something else) please point me where to read this,, thanks a lot -- View this messag

Re: [T5] Tapestry and GWT?

My personal opinion is: its better to play with javascript framework. gwt is good if you have no time (or not wish to) study javascript. Other opinion (that i see many times in various places) gwt is not for big (enterprise) production.. Writing on pure javascript framework (dojo, mochakit..or any

what about MVFLEX (replacing ognl)

i just read about new expression language (http://wiki.mvflex.org/index.php?title=MVFLEX_Expression_Language) These words amazed me: MVEL is an LALR parser utilizing a reduce-fast stack algorithm. And at over 1700% faster than OGNL in most applications, we think you’ll agree that simpler is bette

Re: why taglibs

Thanks a lot.. its clear now :) Nick Westgate wrote: > > It's not JSP style "taglibs". It's standard XHTML namespacing (like XML). > Howard has stated on numerous occasions that an approach similar to the > old jwcid's will be implemented. > > Read the docs for 5: > http://tapestry.apache.org

why taglibs

I was suprised that in tapestry 5 Howard uses taglibs (t:comp) instead of wisywing-friendly standart html tags. Why? I think it was one of the core features of tapestry. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/why-taglibs-tf2580475.html#a7193414 Sent from the Tapestry - User maili

Re: Why Howard choose testNG in tapestry test module

I gues it is :) As i can see Howard has a sharp eye for technologies and he would naver take a bad one.. But may i ask wat exactly better (in short)? Jessek wrote: > > Because TestNG is better ;) > > On 8/21/06, xVik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >

Why Howard choose testNG in tapestry test module

Yesterday i reed a last post on Howars's blog about tapestry testing and i wonder why he choose tastNG not JUnit? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-Howard-choose-testNG-in-tapestry-test-module-tf2144189.html#a5919185 Sent from the Tapestry - User forum at Nabble.com. -

RE: global hivemind service

i really dont know how to invoke application state object into hivemind service. and about singleton model.. i think it creates instance of service on first reference and this instance is also individual for each user.. may be im wrong in general i need somthing like global application state obj

global hivemind service

i need to have global hivemind service (the only for all threads (and all users)) im not shure that treaded model is what i need more dataily: data generated by this service (sitemap for example, stored in some collection) should be accessible by all working threads (and not recalculating for eac

RE: problem with page service incoder

you are absolutely wright. thanks a lot :) my mistake was (not domain absolute oath): when correct is -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/problem-with-page-service-incoder-tf1992991.html#a5501892 Sent from the Tapestry - User forum at Nabble.com.

RE: problem with page service incoder

yes i have this mapping. I should correct myself: naked html means without css, but correctly rendered by tapestry my thoughts: css path in border component is relative to server root and i think browser tryes to find css file wich in domain/css/css.css in domain/subfolder/css/css.css i dont k

problem with page service incoder

I add standart page service url encoder: so my url become beautiful: domain.com/Page.html but url for pages wich is content subfolders renders like that: domain.com/subfolder/Page.html and css file (assigned in the border element) couldn't be found.. and i see naked html.. how it ma