Re: [T5] Injecting page into nested layouts

You're right - casting componentResources#getPage works fine. > @InjectContainer does indeed inject the "parent" of the component. For > InnerLayout this is the page alright, but for Layout it's actually the > InnerLayout because Layout is contained in InnerLayout. Could you clarify the meanin

Re: [T5] Injecting page into nested layouts

Hi Filip That's a typo. The Layout class name should read 'Layout' and not 'InnerLayout' but the relevant code is the same. > A potential solution would be to use ComponentResources#getPage to get > your page in a getter and just use that in your layout. Unfortunately, that won't work. Compo

[T5] Injecting page into nested layouts

em to be a conflict). Should this work? Richard Hoberman Page template: - //page contents Inner layout template: -- //inner layout markup including Layout template: //layout markup including Inner La

[T5] Loops - implicit value?

rovides a loop field "_pageName", which is not marked as a property. Would this field need to be cleared via pageDetach to avoid state hanging around in the pool? Richard Hoberman -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-T5--Loops---implicit-value--tp19011764p19011764.html

[T5] Expansions - calling page methods via componentResources

property expression 'getTitle()'). Where the page class has a simple (non-property) method: public class MyPage { ... public String getTitle() { return "title"; } ... } It works fine from within the page and the expansion ${componentResources.page} shows t

Re: [T4.1.5] with Dojo 1.1.1 Using Beyond Dojo

o 1.1 are you looking for? I have to say that while > I've > been using 1.0 in some projects, 0.4.3 has generally worked for me > extremely > well. > > Kalle > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Richard Hoberman < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[T4.1.5] with Dojo 1.1.1 Using Beyond Dojo

, how much interest is there in co-operating on creating one? Thanks Richard Hoberman FYI, this was discussed at: [1] http://www.nabble.com/T4.1.3---Upgrade-Dojo-td13621341.html#a14341740 [2] http://www.nabble.com/-T4.1--Alternate-JS-library-and-tapestry.event.buildEventProperties-td15470996.html

Re: Autocompleter: value ignored when dismissing dropdown

to setup, but it has been much more > flexible and robust for our needs. > > HTH > > Ben > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Richard Hoberman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi All >> >> Under certain conditions, the autocompleter ig

Autocompleter: value ignored when dismissing dropdown

. I'm going to file a bug report, but I'd like to know whether anyone else has encountered this problem and whether there are any workarounds. Thanks Richard Hoberman -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Autocompleter%3A-value-ignored-when-dismissing-dropdown-tp1823215

Re: Calling javascript after asynchronous update

should work. A workaround is to have the script you want to execute already in the template and conditionally render it On Feb 5, 2008 1:20 PM, Richard Hoberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I'm using Tapestry 4.1.3. I'm trying unsuccessfully to invoke some javascript after

[T4] @For produces strange id values

Hi All I'm trying to use the "index" and "id" attributes of the "For" component to create predictable (parseable) ids. I'm getting the following sequence: item_0, item_0_0, item_1. I was expecting item_0, item_1, item_2, etc. Relevant code belo

Re: [T4] Bug? @For generates hidden controls with same name

ans array .. php recognizes this if input name edns with "[]" Davor Hrg On Feb 6, 2008 12:27 PM, Richard Hoberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks (again), Andreas. You are right and I have found a way that doesn't require using these pairs. I assumed that the POST protocol

Re: [T4] Bug? @For generates hidden controls with same name

I'd prefer not to tie the js so much to tapestry's internals... On Feb 6, 2008 12:22 PM, Richard Hoberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All Below is a form snippet followed by the html generated by Tapestry 4.1.5. The LI element ids are sensibly "For_0" through &quo

[T4] Bug? @For generates hidden controls with same name

as to correspond with the LI ids? Am I missing something? Richard Hoberman updateComponents="jwcidcityList"> value="ognl:ordering"/>

Re: Hidden input controls losing their position

h this by setting the custom id on the first child of the "li". Ultimately I think your first solution is better, because it doesn't rely on any properties of the model. It's up to the server-side code to decide how to implement the re-ordering. Best regards Rich

Hidden input controls losing their position

Tapestry moves these controls? As far as I can tell, it is perfectly legal to place an input control of type hidden within any inline or block content. Thanks Richard Hoberman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additi

Re: Calling javascript after asynchronous update

meone mentioned that something like this now should work. A workaround is to have the script you want to execute already in the template and conditionally render it On Feb 5, 2008 1:20 PM, Richard Hoberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I'm using Tapestry 4.1.3. I'm trying unsucces

Calling javascript after asynchronous update

eRenderSupportImpl (_prs). Am I approaching this the right way? Any pointers appreciated. Richard Hoberman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]