Hi,
I also want to keep the former behavior of URL encoding but have issues
with form submissions.
For keeping the former behavior I added a custom URLEncoder service
which does mostly what was before done in TapestryInternalUtils (see the
code at the end of the post).
However, when I do a form
the
> activation context. I think the rationale for the activation context is
> that it makes nicer looking URLs but that's not needed for Ajax calls.
> So you can either create your own specialized URL encoder in Javascript
> or you can change your Ajax calls to use the request
Hi,
with the fix of TAP5-302 (URL encoded strings that contain symbols such
as %2f (encoded "/") are decoded incorrectly in some environments) the
URI encoding/decoding changed.
AFAICS URIs containing anything else than a-z, A-Z, 0-9 or one of -_.:
are considered invalid.
Therefore, when I have
Hi,
can anybody help with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-135
(Grid.getSortContraints NPE when sortColumnId != null)?
Is there any workaround for this or any other solution?
1) We really want to upgrade T5 because of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2561
2) We really nee
ncluded in the next release.
> Nice night,
> Luca
>
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ge-context-and-404-response-to16649174.html#a16649174
>
> It works fine for 404, you might have to extend it to include the URL
> to the page you are redirecting to.
>
> Hth,
>
> Lutz
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Martin Grotzke
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
when I return a link in some method T5 send a 302. I want to send a 301
to the client. Is this possible with tapestry, without using the servlet
stuff?
Thanx && cheers,
Martn
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
sues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2507 - Palette
> component forces an unwanted form submit under FireFox 3
>
> Yunhua
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Martin Grotzke
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we experience exactly the same issue: w
Hi,
we experience exactly the same issue: with FF3 the palette submits the
form, with FF2 this is not the case. Max, when you submit the issue in
jira please send a ping here, so that I can vote :)
Cheers,
Martin
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 18:23 +0200, Maximilian Weißböck wrote:
> Palette Component
'm not
> sure how much changed between .10 and .11 API-wise. It already seems
> like ancient history to me :-)
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Martin Grotzke
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 17:43 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> >&g
s ;)
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
>
> -Filip
>
> On 2008-05-11 16:12, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 15:13 +0200, Filip S. Adamsen wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Tapestry is trying to inject services into your ASO's constru
pstate.html
>
> -Filip
>
> On 2008-05-11 14:54, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm just upgrading our app from 5.0.10-SNAPSHOT to 5.0.11 and get
> > exceptions for ASOs that have a non default constructor (additionally to
> > the d
Hi,
I'm just upgrading our app from 5.0.10-SNAPSHOT to 5.0.11 and get
exceptions for ASOs that have a non default constructor (additionally to
the default constructor):
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error invoking constructor
com.freiheit.shopping24.shop.search.model.AnalysedSearchParam
e/TAPESTRY-2198
>
> Cheers,
>
> Geoff
>
> On 11/05/2008, at 8:55 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm just upgrading our app to 5.0.11. I see that the dateField
> > component
> > changed (IIRC because of licensing issues). Is it correct
Hi,
I'm just upgrading our app to 5.0.11. I see that the dateField component
changed (IIRC because of licensing issues). Is it correct, that this
version of dateField does not allow setting the format/localization?
If so, is this also the case for 5.0.12-SNAPSHOT?
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
sign
Hi,
I'm just upgrading our T5 app from 5.0.10-SNAPSHOT to 5.0.11.
Before we specified the initial sort order with this:
_grid.setSortColumnId("month");
_grid.setSortAscending(false);
With 5.0.11 this is gone. Can anybody tell me how one can specify the
initial sort order (coumn and ascending
I'll have a look...
Cheers,
Martin
> It already seems
> like ancient history to me :-)
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Martin Grotzke
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 17:43 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> >> The problem wi
ce these problems.
Thanx for your help,
cheers,
Martin
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Martin Grotzke
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > yesterday we deployed our application upgraded from T5.0.5 to 5.0.10
> > (SNAPSHOT 2008-02-11) on the produc
er to track this
down, but it will take about 2 weeks until we could shift our
application with the latest T5 to production.
That's why I asked directly on this list...
Cheers,
Martin
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Martin Grotzke
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
Hi,
yesterday we deployed our application upgraded from T5.0.5 to 5.0.10
(SNAPSHOT 2008-02-11) on the production system, now it hangs from time
to time with several thread blocked at
PerThreadServiceCreator.createObject.
We started with default settings for thetapestry.page-pool.hard-limit
and so
Hi,
we also have a production app running T5 http://www.smatch.com, very
stable, up and running.
Cheers,
Martin
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 21:14 +0100, Jan Vissers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an opportunity to use T5 (5.0.11) in an assignment. My question is;
> is it safe for me to do so? The applicati
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 19:42 +0100, Martin Kersten wrote:
> Hi Martin (G.),
>
>dude I wasn't aware of it either. Nice to know! Thanks!
Thanx to Filip :)
Cheers,
Martin
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin (Kersten)
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: M
; is totally fine and simply I was wrong when I
thought this would end up with & going into the request...
So nothing has to be done or changed or anything :)
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin (Kersten)
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von:
m on the server side? What you are
> describing is not what I would expect, if you are seeing this then there
> might be something else going on.
>
> Josh
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue
s mean that you are seeing a problem on the server side?
Nope, as I just wrote I simply asumed that - misleadingly ;)
Cheers,
Martin
> What
> you are describing is not what I would expect, if you are seeing this
> then there might be something else going on.
>
> Josh
>
>
e: "With HTML, the browser translates "&" to "&" so
> the Web server would only see "&" and not "&" in the query string of
> the request."
>
> http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
>
> It's not a
amp; in place of & are actually correct
> and should not cause problems (I personally have never seen these urls
> cause any).
I would say that a request parameter appended with ¶m=value
would be seen by the server as amp;param instead of just param.
Cheers,
Martin
>
>
ot;;
so the & is rendered as &
Cheers,
Martin
> That is actually the correct behavior and it shouldn't be causing a
> problem in your browser. Are you seeing a problem?
>
> http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
>
> Josh
>
>
> On Mo
Hi,
I have a an html element (iframe) that get's a property of my page class
(the current query string) appended to its src attribute.
The query string may contain the "&" char, which always gets expanded as
"&". Is there any possibility to prevent T5 from encoding this char?
Thanx && cheers,
Ma
If you're working on linux, there's the possibility to run IE:
http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/page/Main_Page
Cheers,
Martin
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 12:08 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've done some work on it in 5.0.11, and tested with Mac Firefox 2 and
> Windows IE 7. I don't have acce
Hi,
it should be possible to resolve templates as you want, see
http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-Personalizing-page-and-component-template-td14098291.html
for example.
Cheers,
Martin
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 09:23 -0600, Robert Zeigler wrote:
> Page templates can be placed in the context root (or appro
more elegant than this
> unfortunately - you can see the same thing in RoR (widgets, etc).
>
> Hope this helps - sorry I couldn't be more specific about the dynamic
> layout.
>
> chris
>
> Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > Yep, you're right. But there are
te:
> Hello Martin,
> What isn't clear, is what is the question? If it's how to implement it I
> guess the post you've already found describes it good enough.
>
> Renat
>
> On 06/02/2008, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
>
Hello,
I have a question concerning the relation between template and page
class, which admittedly has already been raised sometimes :)
Especially, the thread "T5: Personalizing page and component template"
(http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-Personalizing-page-and-component-template-td14098291.html)
se
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 21:38 +1100, Geoff Callender wrote:
> * Perhaps what we really need is @Persist("redirection")?!?!?!
+1, this would make things more easy!
Cheers,
Martin
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 21:38 +1100, Geoff Callender wrote:
> Good point, Davor. The way I've used flash persistence it c
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 18:54 +0100, Francois Armand wrote:
> I spoke to fast : it seems that in T5.0.9, even "slashes" are handled
> correctly with utf-8 filter activated.
This would be really great - then we should take the effort and upgrade...
Good luck to you,
cheers,
Martin
On Mon, 2008-01-
static String urlDecode(String input) {
// only decode slashes
String decoded = input.replace(SLASH_REPLACEMENT_CHAR, "/");
return decoded;
}
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 17:19 +0100, Francois Armand wrote:
> Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
gt; >>>
> >>> void cleanupRender() {
> >>> _form.clearErrors();
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> Some notes:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Detached object - Person is a detached entity. I am deliberately
> >>> avoiding refreshing it every time in setupRender() because a) it
> >>>
> > Michael
> >
> > ---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 12:22 +0200, Christian Koeberl wrote:
> > I have a form with a 'textfield' and a 'upload' field .
> > The Chinese words I input in textfield will be irrecognizable when I
> > submit the form .
>
> I wondered, why nobody found this bug before. Anyway, I filed the
> bug yeste
Hi,
you should set up your environment as it's described in the tutorial
(http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tutorial1/env.html).
AFAIK T5 class reloading does work with jetty 5 + jetty launcher only.
Cheers,
Martin
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 11:42 -0700, entelechon wrote:
> I am using Eclipse WT
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 17:37 -0300, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> And has anyone implemented a Select-like component for multiple option
> selection? It would be very nice to have both multiselect and palette, as
> T4 has.
Take a look at this thread, it's really easy to implement multise
).
> >
> > There may be a bug here, however. It looks like Tapestry may be overly
> > aggressive in terms of caching the value of ${currentPage}, as if it were a
> > literal value and not a dynamic expression. Again, prop:currentPage will do
> > the right thing.
&g
t looks like Tapestry may be overly
> aggressive in terms of caching the value of ${currentPage}, as if it were a
> literal value and not a dynamic expression. Again, prop:currentPage will do
> the right thing.
>
>
> On 7/20/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Anybody out there?
What should I check for analysing this issue?
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 18:17 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> I suppose that what I'm expecting is not the way it should work.
>
> Can I do anything to see what's the rea
I suppose that what I'm expecting is not the way it should work.
Can I do anything to see what's the reason for this?
Any help appreciated,
thx,
Martin
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 08:45 +0200, Kristian Marinkovic wrote:
>
onent Search:pager: Binding
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is read-only.
Is there another way of resetting a parameter binding?
How is it intended to work, when is a cached parameter reset?
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
>
>
> @Parameter(cache=false,...)
>
> g,
> kris
>
>
>
Hi,
I wrote a simple pager component but one parameter (currentPage)
is not updated in a second request.
In the template I have the following:
In the page class this currentPage accessor:
public int getCurrentPage() {
return _currentPage;
}
which is an int and has the cor
an find out more about this...
> this is really important for my organization.
>
> thanks in advance!
> Peter
>
> Thanks in advance
> peter
>
> Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't remember if it was this error that we also encountered
uot;Create new address" page link. Does anyone know what went wrong?
>
> Thanks
> John
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
't had a chance to test it yet.
>
> cheers
> Ben
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Grotzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 9:06 AM
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: Re: T5: NPE in Base64InputStream and
> > l
f request
processing threads did not increase.
So there seems to be no (direct) interrelationship between the NPE
and the locked threads.
Cheers,
Martin
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 23:43 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we had an issue with our deployed application that did not respond
&g
Hi,
we had an issue with our deployed application that did not respond
anymore. This happened two or three times in the last 4 days, but
I was not able to reproduce it until now.
The analysis of the logs showed, that there was a NPE in
Base64InputStream, and afterwards the application did not res
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 08:27 +0200, Kristian Marinkovic wrote:
>
> just remove the InjectService annotation from your service
> method and try it again :)
Cool, really easy :)
Thanx a lot,
cheers,
Martin
>
>
>
> Martin Grotzke
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
&g
ld provide our custom MarkupWriterFactory?
This is not the fact - with @InjectService("MarkupWriterFactory")
T5 provides its MarkupWriterFactoryImpl and not our custom
MarkupWriterFactory.
Did I understand you wrong, or is this a "bug" in T5?
Cheers,
Martin
>
> g,
&g
final Object delegate )
which we have to change to @InjectService("myMarkupWriterFactory") then.
Is this the intended way? Is it guaranteed, that T5 does not reference
the MarkupWriterFactory implementation by the id "MarkupWriterFactory"?
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
>
couldn't find an appropriate issue, so I created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1621
Cheers,
Martin
>
> On 6/19/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 20:21 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > > O
cept up and running if at all possible.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Thanks again.
>
> David Kendall
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 20:04 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 11:57 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> This issue is very crucial for us, so until this feature is implemented
> we need to implement some workaround or quick fix that creates valid
> xhtml output.
>
;s
somehow possible.
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
>
> On 6/19/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 20:21 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > > Our template uses the following DOCTYPE definition:
> > >
> > > > >
To pick up this topic again...
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 08:19 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 20:21 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > Our template uses the following DOCTYPE definition:
> >
> > > PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN&qu
jquery + T5 would be really great (we're also going to use this
combination)
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 16:43 -0400, Evan Rawson - Work wrote:
> i dont know how many you know about jquery, i recently discovered it today,
> and from the demo's and plugins i found from it it look very superior verses
---
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
&g
Hi,
I just want to pickup this topic in a new thread, to make sure
it's noticed - thx to Uli's suggestion in the previous thread :)
At first a short summary again:
- T5 (the PageRenderDispatcher) tries to decode activation context
arguments (in convertActivationContext).
- The activation contex
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 22:02 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is an urgent and important issue for us. Can anybody help
> with this? Howard?
>
> As I wrote below: request.getServletPath() (or request.getPath())
> already provides the decoded path.
> a) Should r
PageRenderDispatcher.convertActivationContext) be skipped?
Is anything else the problem? E.g. might the problem be caused
by commons URLCodec?
Thanx in advance,
cheers,
Martin
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 12:20 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 23:24 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> &g
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 10:45 +0200, Martin Dietze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using a Grid component for displaying a larger set of
> data. On my page I have form which I use to allow the user to
> set the perferred page size. When the user selects a new
> setting the form submits and changes the page c
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 20:21 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> Our template uses the following DOCTYPE definition:
>
> PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
>
> What's wrong with
there's a field
> violating the validation rules.
>
> Ariel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grotzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 9:28 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: T5 validation error images displayed
> withform.clientVali
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1588,
a patch will follow soon hopefully :)
Cheers,
Martin
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 10:26 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> An issue or a patch will be fine.
>
> On 6/18/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
l-formed XML.
>
> On 6/18/07, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/18/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > T5 currently renders markup that is not XHTML compliant.
> >
> > Yes and no.
> >
>
Hi,
even if you set clientValidation="false" on a form, T5 renders the
validation error image for all input components (for validation
errors that might occur):
AFAICS with clientValidation="false" this should not be needed and
markup could be improved + page load time reduced.
Shall we submit
Hi,
T5 currently renders markup that is not XHTML compliant.
E.g. the element '' is rendered as '' - the tag is not closed
properly.
Is there any way to force T5 to generate XHTML compliant markup?
Thx && cheers,
Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 23:24 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> I just stepped through the sources to see where the URI get's
> decoded to the activation context arguments, and found that the
> o.a.t.internal.services.PageRenderDispatcher.dispatch invokes
> convertActivationContext w
heers,
Martin
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 23:01 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 10:38 +0200, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> > In case you are using Tomcat try adding URIEncoding="UTF-8" to your
> > connector definition in server.xml.
> I just tried that, but it d
ct
decoding of the request parameters / uri?
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
>
> Uli
>
> On Mo, 11.06.2007, 23:13, Martin Grotzke sagte:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have currently an encoding issue, but am not really sure what's
> > the reason for this.
> >
>
the
> name ...
Ok, solution for this case ;)
Cheers,
Martin
>
> Jirka
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
app. Apart from this one issue T5 is really wonderful!
Cheers,
Martin
>
> Jirka
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ory or anything, so
> > that you have to pull other resources like DAOs or services
> > from the spring bean factory if you need them
> >
> > Apart from that it feels really good.
>
> Thanks for your opinion ...
>
> Jirka
>
>
> ---
ere's no validatorfactory or anything, so
that you have to pull other resources like DAOs or services
from the spring bean factory if you need them
Apart from that it feels really good.
Cheers,
Martin
>
> jirka
>
> Martin Grotzke napsal(a):
> > Yes, we already did this,
heers,
Martin
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 09:26 +0200, Jiri Mares wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> why not to implement your own Field and fill it with the name and pass it
> into recordError?
>
> Jirka
>
> Martin Grotzke napsal(a):
> > Yes, I totally understand and it's of c
> There's a long history in Tapestry of any time there's a hint of extra
> API, people find a way to abuse it. So I'm being very, very
> conservative!
>
> On 6/12/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And what are your concerns with an additi
And what are your concerns with an additional method
recordError(String,String) on the ValidationTracker (and Form)?
Cheers,
Martin
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 09:19 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I'm not familiar enough with Hibernate Validator to say.
>
> On 6/11/07, Martin G
Hi,
I have currently an encoding issue, but am not really sure what's
the reason for this.
I have an url that contains a url encoded german umlaut (ü) in UTF-8
and looks like the following:
http://localhost:8080/app/search/%C3%BCbel (the %C3%BC represents the ü
in UTF-8, this url is created by
c
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 11:25 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> Thanx for this explanation, Adam!
>
> I just set clientValidation to false for my form, however, the js files
> are added to body. Is it somehow possible to tell T5 not to add
> these libraries (or scriptaculous.js) to t
Hi Howard,
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 22:44 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> Does this enable us to use hibernate validator in our business layer
> that is completely independent from tapestry?
> Hibernate validator is right now our favorite option for validation,
> but it might be that we
Currently using one of these solutions that combines prototype and
> scriptaculous is not possible with the Form component since it wants to
> add a separate file for both prototype and scriptaculous. However
> adding compressed versions for each works.
>
> Adam
>
>
> -
hat would allow you to replace p&s with some other
> similar library, such as Dojo.
>
> On 6/10/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > T5 adds several js libraries to the body, e.g. prototype.js,
> > scriptaculous.js and others.
>
Hi,
T5 adds several js libraries to the body, e.g. prototype.js,
scriptaculous.js and others.
Are they all required, or is there a possibility to affect
which libs are added to the body?
Thx && cheers,
Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
nt-
> and server-side validation for them.
>
> On 6/9/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We want to do validation in the business layer (with hibernate
> > validator) and get back an exception with a list of invalid values,
> > where each invalid value prov
sult;
> > }
> >
> > so an additional method seems to be not a big issue.
> >
> > Would this be possible to add to T5? Shall we submit a patch for this
> > here in the list or enter an issue?
> >
> > Thanx && cheers,
> > Martin
> >
> &g
}
so an additional method seems to be not a big issue.
Would this be possible to add to T5? Shall we submit a patch for this
here in the list or enter an issue?
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Grotzke
Dipl.-Inf.
freiheit.com technologies gmbh
Straßenbahnring 22 / 20251 Hamburg
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 21:28 +0200, Martin Dietze wrote:
> On Thu, June 07, 2007, Davor Hrg wrote:
>
> > It's a guess, but I think that you just need to persist the property.
> > @Persist("flash")
>
> That's what I thought, but it does not work. It seems to have
> to do with the way T5 initializes
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:39 +0200, Michael Maier wrote:
> Am 06.06.2007 um 23:00 schrieb Martin Grotzke:
> > I didn't change the type of _value to be able to use the component
> > with or without multiple="true", but perhaps it's better to have a
> > dedic
that s.th. isn't right...
However, it's very nice, but I think for now I stick to the
simple MultiSelect version...
Cheers,
Martin
>
> On 6/6/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > AFAICS doesn't the select component support the att
, ex.getMessage());
> return;
> }
> } // if
> }
>
> method. Now I have a "multiple-select" component which takes a value
> parameter as a set...and it works fine...
>
> cheers
>
> Michael
>
> Am 06.06.
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 21:51 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAICS doesn't the select component support the attribute
> "multiple", only the first selected option is set on the
> value.
>
> Is there some way to get this to work with support for &quo
Hi,
AFAICS doesn't the select component support the attribute
"multiple", only the first selected option is set on the
value.
Is there some way to get this to work with support for "multiple"?
Thx && cheers,
Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 17:21 +0700, Ivan Dubrov wrote:
> Nick Westgate wrote:
> > Hi Martin.
> >
> > A typical way to do this in previous Tapestry versions is to have
> > some simple logic functions in your component class to provide a
> > boolean result ("this link is to the current page") which is
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 09:00 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:54 +0200, Francois Armand wrote:
> > Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 07:28 +0000, Martin Grotzke a écrit :
> > > For me changed classes are not picked up automatically, when running
> > > mvn
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
