You can instantiate a page by hand, but this will undermine the caching
strategy of tapestry. My guess is, that you are better off rethinking
your method of resolution.
would you happen to know how i could achieve that?
my requirement might not necessarily undermine tapestry's caching
strategy
affected
hence we're looking for a way to create a new instance of the page
even though the cycle might already have instantiated the page once
before
Thanks, karthik
On 4/16/07, Christian Haselbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a
Hi,
While I am in a page "Page1" listener method and when I execute the
following code:
newPage = currentPage.getRequestCycle().getPage("Page1" );
I find that newPage and this page are both the same object
i.e. System.out.println( newPage == this ); evals to true
I have a req
yet another option on similar lines is to have display=none for a bunch of
fields that are actually there in your HTML form and rendered via tapestry,
but show up only when the user clicks on the button to add a row. ( of
course that would mean that you cannot support "infinite" adds! )
On 12/14/
also you can consider using Tacos if you're wed to tapestry 4.0.x
On 12/14/06, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tapestry traces the rendered components and uses this info on rewind -
its better not to temper with that.
If you need JS magic, try using T41 - using Ajax this should be
possi
have an enclosing
Form 1 here
Form 2 here
and updateComponents will update twoForms
On 12/13/06, karthik G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have one page in my application. I want to display a panel/form
(FORM-1) in the page that allows user to do ajax submit. Once t
len,
on your blog can you please post a screen shot of how the "Please wait"
component display looks?
Thanks
http://lombok.demon.co.uk/tapestry4Demo/TestFCKeditor2.html
http://lombok.demon.co.uk/tapestry4Demo/TestFCKeditor1.html
On 12/1/06, Peter Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2006/10/ezing-builder-wysiwyg-builder-for.html
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von
1. if you can modify your pojo have a boolean isChecked in it which you can
wire to the checkbox in your for loop
2. if not, wrap a DTO around your pojo which has this boolean
3. during the rewind cycle the checked boolean will be set
4. in your listener method you can iterate through the List tha
On 11/24/06, jiju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tacos & Ajax call seems a good solution,
but these hidden fields also needed to be updated using updateComponents ?
No need
and one more query, is HTTPRequest available in page class ?
get it through the cycle in the listener
tapestry is not aware of your new form fields. if you use firebug you'll
find that these fields don't figure in the "hidden" field that tapestry uses
to keep track of its meta-info used for render/rewind.
one way to solve this problem is to use Tacos and make an Ajax call.
another way is to loo
can you share the steps and snippets from the config and web.xml files and
other steps?
On 11/19/06, Nick Evgeniev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've solved the problem by switching to spring. It's too strange (after
experience with hivemindfilter+applicationservlet) but spring tapestry
inte
Look at the API docs
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/apidocs/index.html
AbstractPage has getNestedComponent
AbstractPage extends AbstractComponent that has getComponents()
HTH
On 11/17/06, Mike Oestereter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Say I've got the following on a template
we do a lot of this PropSel refreshes using Tacos and AjaxEventSubmit. HTH.
On 11/16/06, Erik Husby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:58 PM, Karthik N wrote:
> erik,
>
> from what i understand you have
>
> Custom Component -> contains Form -> c
erik,
from what i understand you have
Custom Component -> contains Form -> contains PropSel
- when the PropSel changes, then its enclosing Form causes the submit.
i have a suspicion this Form might be causing your Custom Component not to
rewind and hence probably the
Custom Component never
Jesse, you rock!
What I love about tapestry - 2 Books - TIA, EWDT4, and a small forum with
experts on it. Just the right recipe for a wonderful framework :-)
Thanks, Karthik
Hi Navin,
You are right. That is exactly my doubt/question. How do OGNL bindings
work for nested components inside a Block that is a part of a different page
and NOT the page that is currently being rendered.
Thanks, Karthik
On 11/9/06, B.S.Navin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Firas,
I thin
o this:
This is off the top of my head, so the syntax might not be exactly
correct,
but you get the general idea I hope. Hope that helps!
On 11/6/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> "RenderBlock does not mandate that the Block being rendered be
> cont
Hello,
"RenderBlock does not mandate that the Block being rendered be contained
within the page being rendered"
I have seen this statement at so many places - but I am looking for an
example/explanation of how to do it.
Any pointers?
Thanks, Karthik
yes i did use idPath for the hidden field.
but i'm using tapestry 4.0.2 - could that be the reason i'm seeing different
results than you are?
On 11/5/06, Patrick Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
did you assign the hidden field's id using idPath?
Also I am using the 4.1.1 SVN build.
I am havi
Sam is right.
is correct
We have used this before and it works well.
On 11/3/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've never actually done this, but I imagine that the following
statement in the your .page file would pass an IActionListener to your
components
That might be "listen
Hi,
I would like to do some initialization in a custom component that I'm
writing up.
I observe that I can do it in two ways:
1. Implement the PageBeginRenderListener and use pageBeginRender
2. Override prepareForRender
My question is: Which one should I use?
Thanks, Karthik
glad it worked.
i think one of the powers of tapestry is the ability to be able to tap into
lifecycle methods, as also register listeners (like pageBeginRender)
i don't have exact answers to your question "but is this optimal?" - it
depends on what you want to do. if you want your component to
you are setting the searchText on the Result page and not on the
SearchComponent in the result page.
since you have the searchText on the Result page you need to now "transfer"
it to the SearchComponent in the result page.
you can consider setting the searchText of the SearchComponent in the
pag
please try click() instead of onclick()
On 10/26/06, Peter Beshai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there an easy way of calling a listener after the page appears
(rendered)
on screen? I couldn't think of one, and so I tried having adding an event
to
the onload of the page:
dojo.event.connect(win
use a hidden field to set the output of your javascript function. this
hidden field is bound to a tapestry property. that way it will get set in
the rewind cycle.
in order to cause a submit you can have a hidden AjaxSubmit button that you
can cause a click() on after you've set the hidden prope
any user/password that can be used for voting?
On 10/25/06, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please vote for this issue... it might get resolved faster :)
Karthik N wrote:
> carlos, any solutions you found?
>
> Thanks, Karthik
>
--
Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL
carlos, any solutions you found?
Thanks, Karthik
out of sheer curiosity. when you programmatically create the direct link,
how will you also create the associated HTML for the anchor tag, and bind
that HTML to the DirectLink created?
Can you post your code snippet once done, please?
hi peter, we use both jwcid and id. so far it's been good for us.
Thanks, Karthik
see if you find anything useful here
http://howardlewisship.com/downloads/
( ... and let me know!)
peter - the first step would be to isolate the issue
are you able to make this widget work without tapestry and with just plain
vanilla HTML and dojo?
if not, then that would be an excellent starting point.
On 10/17/06, Peter Beshai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am interested in using the dojo
Thanks for any tips...
First Tip:
Kindly don't change the subject of your message - email clients like Gmail
don't show them in the same thread and it becomes really hard to follow.
it's more of an HTML thing than Tapestry - if a field is marked disabled -
then it doesn't figure in the HTTP request that the Browser sends to the
server.
and hence tapestry in turn will not assign these values, as they're not part
of the HTTPRequest at all.
On 10/15/06, Jabbar <[EMAIL PROTECT
First things first: have a lot of System.out.printlns or log statements to
see what's going on.
Anyway, I observe that you have a dependency on this code to return a List
succsessfully
setChannelSetup(getCello6DAO().getChannelSetup(getCelloSerialNumber()));
Have you verified that the DAO indee
you're not the only one - it takes time to get a hang of PropSelModel - but
once the functionality of PropSel is clear, it's a breeze.
by the way - HL Ship's tapestry in action has a really nice explanation of
PropSel - worth a read.
all the best.
On 10/14/06, Jabbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jabbar,
without looking too deep into your code, the reason why the 1st value is
getting selected is because you've not got any value in the PropSelection
that equals loggingRate.
i'd suggest two things
1. put some SOPs in your property selection model methods - especially
translateValue to pri
Kind of answering my own question:
log4j.logger.tapestry.enhance=DEBUG
does the trick. I can see the enhanced source code being printed.
The unanswered part for me, but more for academic interest is:
How the log4j configuration translates to hivemind knowing to create a new
Log object for the C
Hi,
In my tapestry app I'm trying to figure how to log the code of the Enhanced
class. I dug through the sources and found that in the
EnhancementOperationImpl there is this statement:
if (_log != null)
_log.debug("Creating class:\n\n" + _classFab);
EnhancementOperationImpl
if you're on 4.1 do as jesse suggests.
if you're on 4.0 then:
1. make sure your ajaxeventsubmit is declared BEFORE the combo boxes
2. make sure you got your event name right - this can be tried out by having
a simple alert('hello world') to make sure the right even is in fact getting
generated.
in tacos have a look at ajaxevensubmit and hook it to the onchange of your
combo boxes.
On 9/23/06, Mark Helmstetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any examples of how to implement an Ajax enabled double combo
box? Is there a component that supports this?
I was hoping for something simp
is that we have some logic in the page validate which
relies on stuff in the HTTP session, and i want to catch the expiration
before the page validate gets called
any pointers?
On 9/23/06, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Karthik N wrote:
> follow the thread: Expired Session Message
i've been reading up on this
http://www.nabble.com/Asynchronous-form-submission-tf2253801.html#a6270976
follow the thread: Expired Session Message - nabble seems to have mixed 2 or
3 threads in 1.
the gist, as i've gathered so far - you can create and register your own
StaleSession page
good l
it appears your hibernate session is not getting flushed properly. are you
using transaction boundaries?
somehow even though your objects are getting dirtied the first time around,
it is the second time dirty of the form field that's causing the hibernate
session to flush/commit to the DB.
On
Sometimes visual scanning of the Email subject seems to help me a lot.
But maybe it's just me ...
On 9/21/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can't you categorize based on the recipient? Gmail offers that as an
option
when filtering.
-Original Message-----
Is there any way to set up the mails that go out prefixed with
[Tapestry-Users] or something such? Just helps categorization of mails an
easier tasks, visually.
Thanks, Karthik
you should look at the excellent Tacos framework to help you on this. It
makes Ajax with Tapestry a breeze, thanks to some great work done.
http://tacos.sourceforge.net/
in addition, if need be, you can look at Dojo and DWR to help you with Ajax.
On 9/21/06, Daniel Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I personally pass the objects as parameters.
One thing we find is that we "set out" planning to use a Custom component
for one page alone, but very soon there are so many uses and variants, that
it's always preferable for the component to be loosely coupled with the
service layer.
Which in other
I have the same issues with tapernate SVN.
It's been more than a month but no luck!! :-(
On 9/20/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Couldn't find a specific list for tapestry-acegi so I post this here.
I can't seem to access the anonymous svn repository. All I can find is
tha
sure, why not.
look at chap 4 for ewdt4 section "Distinguishing which button was clicked" -
there are several techniques
On 9/13/06, Peter Dawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
guys,
i am using tap3 and am trying to implement a form. however the user
has the option to click on two buttons, dependin
nent.
Could someone please validate.
On 9/11/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am using 4.0.2
It shows the id of the caller component for . So id is always got from the enclosing component even
though name isn't.
TextField.jwc has
which means that the id param
..
What's the output when CustomComponent.html is
Karthik N wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a scenario in which a custom component "wraps" a TextField
> component.
>
> CustomComponent.html
>
>
>
> CustomCo
Hi,
I have a scenario in which a custom component "wraps" a TextField
component.
CustomComponent.html
CustomComponent.jwc textfield snippet:
Page configuration of CustomComponent:
i find that the underlying TextField id hon
look at the popuplinkrenderer component.
On 9/6/06, Nilesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
I need to add dynamic link to Tapestry Page, which should open in a pop-up
window. can any one please let me know how can i do this?
Thanks A lot
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/D
look at your web server/app server documentation for http sessions and how
they time out.
On 9/5/06, Peter Dawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok. how can i implement a session time-out.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why don't you consider using @PropertySelection and implement the
IPropertySelectionModel which will wire up to your table columns.
On 8/31/06, Peter Dawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
guys,
i am running into this problem within my web app. please help me. i am
using tap3.
now i am retrieving co
Hello All,
We're really eager to adopt Tapernate for our Tap + Spring + Hibernate
application. I have a few questions, that would help me understand
Tapernate better:
1) any idea when the session-per-conversation support may be wired in? I
remember seeing a thread where James had mentioned tha
look at the @Border component
On 8/26/06, Josh Joy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
Newbie question...I would like to maintain the same
header and footer
for each page (basically simulate an include)...what
is the recommended
approach to doing this? Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Josh
ation of the annotation at runtime is to
walk up the class hierarchy and ask each superclass for the declared
methods that correspond the abstract method and get its annotations. As
far as I've found out, that works.
Kind regards,
Robert
Karthik N schrieb:
Hi,
I'm trying t
Hi,
I'm trying to use custom annotations on tapestry abstract methods of a page
class
After tapestry creates the enhanced class for these abstract methods, the
annotations are lost.
The annotations are however honored on methods with an implementation.
I'm wondering is this annotations not car
Neither do Masks work on FF 1.5.0.6
Also, Tabs with no contents worked on my colleague's machine. On mine, the
text flashes and then disappears, and I see no Tabs too.
I am on FF 1.5.0.6 Mac OS X 10.4.6
On 8/25/06, Mael Caldas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Masks, from Core Components doesn't
Hi,
We have a custom set of HiveMind initializers that we're using with Tapestry
4.0.2.
OgnlFixesInitializer belongs to a different module than
DomainPackagesInitializer.
It should be fired BEFORE DomainPackagesInitializer and hence we have the
dependency configured.
While deploying this on To
instead of hardcoding the value as
:orderId, ?
filename, ?
size, ?
!delete: :delete, ?
!moveUp: :moveUp, ?
!moveDown: :mov
yes, i would be very interested in the source code.
On 8/22/06, Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've been having many strange errors message in our logs and several
synchronization errors on session objects (especially visit).
Also users kept getting error pages when they were clicking
i don't have an exact explanation till i view your source code.
i'm glad it works, so maybe you can do some more research to see why the
volatile makes the difference for the ticked/unticked issue of yours.
your understanding of volatile is incorrect.
in fact, with volatile="false" the For comp
Hmm. rather bizzare. Can you try setting volatile="true" on the For
component and see how it goes?
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/For.html
On 8/20/06, zqzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, thanks for your hints, and its working, generally, but i m stuck with
you would need to post the source of your IBasicTableModel for any further
specific help.
considering you're new to tapestry, i'd suggest a hardcoded implementaiton
of IBasicTableModel first and then get spring/hibernate into the picture.
On 8/18/06, anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I'm f
Will if your Page1 was like:
Yes, I've used this before and it works very well. Unfortunately I need to
render an entire existing page as-is, and I can't have a multi-window
app!(customer requirement) :-(
Hello,
First-off apologies for the cross-post, but I figured I might get answers
from either of the forums.
I'm using Tap 4.0 and Tacos4 beta2.
I already have a "FindPage" developed.
I have this requirement where I have a Page 1. Inside Page 1, I have a
Find button. On click of the Find but
based on
when you submit, then the value from the check box will be automatically
inserted into currentAttendance.attended - you don't need to do anything.
if you don't want to change the datatype of the Attendance domain objects,
then you can just have the following methods on your attend
you should ensure that the Attendance list provided to the For loop is
exactly the same both during render and rewind.
then, irrespective of the number of rows the render/rewind sequence will be
exactly the same.
so the checkbox on render will correspond to the same Attendance object
when the r
you could also try using the disable informal parameter for some HTML input
elements.
something like this in the .html
and this in the .page
the isViewPage evaluates to true or false and makes the input element
disabled.
of course this makes for a server roundtrip.
's book and I love it. But, I
did
have to pay for it. It would be nice if there were free resources out
there
that folks could use to get started (and get hooked) using Tapestry.
-Original Message-
From: Karthik N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:06 PM
To:
get yourself a copy of Enjoying Web Development with Tapestry by Kent
Tong. It's got the tutorial approach to tapestry.
On 8/15/06, Gurps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We need an equivalent set of tutorials very simiar to the asp.net
quicjkstarts tutorial, but with tapestry. Step by step, build
can you try prefixing your block with
i think that should do the trick
On 8/14/06, Rahat Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear All,
I am using Tapestry4 for my project. My problem is after adding JWCID
in the HTML mocks,The
view of some of the mocks have been changed.That means the Static
any reason why you'd not like to use javascript?
On 8/11/06, Simon Raveh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to tie a submit button to the refresh/cancel listener
without using javascript using tapestry 4.0
Simon
Karthik N wrote:
> your search should be bound to th
your search should be bound to the form refresh listener - that way
validations won't fire.
On 8/11/06, Theo vN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I use the same Form to either create (create button) a record or to
search (search button) for records.
I want to do input validation (only server-side
e when it doesn't need them.
That way you can still use them in your own javascript.
Cheers,
Nick.
Karthik N wrote:
> every element that does not have the jwcid attribute is treated as
"normal"
> html - tapestry does not care too much about it.
>
> every element that has
this is how tapestry works. field-level validations of one field are not
known to other fields.
we have a similar situation where we wanted to avoid DTOs and use Domain
Objects (the exposed domain pattern). we find that the underlying objects
can get dirtied in a number of ways. validation is j
every element that does not have the jwcid attribute is treated as "normal"
html - tapestry does not care too much about it.
every element that has jwcid is an indicator to tapestry that we're creating
a tapestry component - so such html takes a very different lease of life as
a tapestry componen
}
}
TabGroup.html:
TabGroup.java:
@Parameter(name="parameters", required=false)
public abstract Object getParameters();
@Parameter(name="listener", required=false)
public abstract IActionListener getListener();
Not sure if this is the preferred way, but it works
any luck with this issue?
After some discussions and experimentation with a colleague of mine, it
appears that there is only one component. that's the nature of the For
loop. We did this in the listener on the page:
Map comps = this.getComponents();
Set keyMap = comps.keySet();
my understaing is that page property initial values are driven more off the
initial-value attribute, rather than @Persist.
On 8/6/06, hv @ Fashion Content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you annotate a page property @Persist'd, will it be null until you
assign
it a value?
el variable
won't
be known inside of it.
On 8/4/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> each value is stored in a model object in the page. this is because of
> ognl:model
>
> imagine this being like a for loop
>
> for(i=0; i < 10; i++) {
>
>
is iterating through
On 8/4/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do you pass the Model object to your getAnswer function?
And while writing the line on the page, how is he going to know which
model
is that line referring to?
On 8/4/06, Karthik N < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
iable is
inside an object through which I am iterating in a @For loop.
The problem with trial and error is that I don't know where to begin.
On 8/4/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> please try this:
>
> href=ognl:answer
>
> and in
>
> publi
trial and error you'll get it right in 5
attempts!! :-)
On 8/4/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I changed my code to this:
But now I get an alert saying "ognl:model.answer".
On 8/4/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
n TRUE/FALSE for rendering. They aren't
typically (hidden input fields) meant to be human friendly so I appreciate
the length of statements. (Esp as there are sometimes a great number of
them)
On 8/4/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes I meant changing the values of the hi
I am assuming that to the @DirectLink you are passing the appropriate
parameter(s) that makes it render a unique URL for each iteration? Any
code snippets would help.
On 8/4/06, Reto Hotz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Karthik,
On 8/4/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, also don't forget the power of "this" and how it changes
> depending
> > on
> > > context. I'd have to see your code but it's quite possible that you
> can
> > > navigate from "this&quo
code but it's quite possible that you can
> navigate from "this" to any dom node in your browser if "this" points to
a
> dom node.
>
> On 8/4/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > i guess i'm not too clear what you want to
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Javascript runs on the client browser, the @If is evaluated on the
> server
>
> What are you trying to accomplish ?!?!?!?!?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Karthik N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Freitag, 4. August 2006 14:45
>
i would suggest you use javascript to be able to do this on the client side
only. iterate through the dom and set the disabled property for your form
controls based on the button click
On 8/4/06, zqzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mmm i meant to disable the component not to use the disabled com
Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we could be more helpful if you told us what the general purpose
of
your logic is? (ie does it have to do with validation?)
On 8/4/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a rather bizzare requirement (I think)
>
&
I think you will have to look at the parameters that are passed to your
TabGroup component. ensure you have cache="false" on all of them in the
.jwc file of TabGroup
On 8/4/06, Reto Hotz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
In T4, I have a custom component (TabGroup) in a @For loop. The
componen
we were able to get most of our code outside of the initialize method. one
important learning, in trying to port the initialize() to pageBeginRender
- pageBeginRender never gets called for a DirectLink, but only for Form
Submits
On 8/4/06, Nick Westgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Chris.
I
I'm not sure about the form itself, but you can disable Form controls using
the disabled HTML attribute.
On 8/4/06, zqzuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, just wonder is there any way to disable a form component in code?
i searched tapestry api, but seems theres only a method isDisabled() which
I have a rather bizzare requirement (I think)
My Form has 3 or 4 @If components. At any point only one of the @If is
True, all others are false.
But, for a particular Submit button I want all the @If to force-evaluate to
True on the Rewind.
One ugly way is to actually change the HTML using ja
i guess i'm not too clear what you want to achieve:
i suppose you can have an informal parameter onclick=ognl:clickAction and
then create the javascript in the getClickAction which forms the string
based on the current ID
On 8/4/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
I need to pass
pestry considers the parameter
cached and doesn't re-evaluate it. And I don't know of a way to tell
tapestry not to cache it because obviously I can't change the @Block
component specification. Any ideas?
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 19:17 +0530, Karthik N wrote:
> i've faced a si
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
