Re: [ANN] Tapestry5-jQuery 2.6.0

But I guess some work has to be done to fit the new tapestry 5.3 javascript spirit. 2011/8/25 Clément Uster > > Thanks, > There is a specific branch on github for tapestry 5.3 ;) > https://github.com/got5/tapestry5-jquery/tree/Tapestry-jquery_T53 > > > On 25 August 2011

Re: [ANN] Tapestry5-jQuery 2.6.0

gt; > > http://nexus.devlab722.net/nexus/content/repositories/snapshots > > > > > > > > > > > > false > > >

Re: Tapestry5 jQuery integration and tap 5.3

Hey Zubair, I've done it on a particular branch on github -> Tapestry-jquery_T53 This is version 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT. Everything seems ok, but please let me know if something is wrong with it. If you have more specific questions regarding this project, I suggest you to send them to the dedicated mailin

Re: Client id of a zone inside another zone

ps the javascript id for the zone constant across zone updates > > regards > Taha > > 2011/7/1 Clément Uster > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm encountering a problem with zones, I have a specific case where a > zone > > is embedded in another zone. > > I ha

Client id of a zone inside another zone

Hi all, I'm encountering a problem with zones, I have a specific case where a zone is embedded in another zone. I have two actionlinks, the first updates the first zone and the second one updates the second zone. I think the best is to read the code :) tml link1 link2 ${count} jav

Re: Tapestry5-JQuery Integration and tapestry-beanvalidator

My bad... I think it should be ok now. On 22 June 2011 18:38, Matias Blasi wrote: > Hi Clément, > > I updated tapestry-jquery and I got the following new error: > > missing ; before statement > tapestry-beanvalidator.js()tapestry-beanvalidator.js (line 15) > var Tapestry.Validator={}; > > Regar

Re: Tapestry5-JQuery Integration and tapestry-beanvalidator

You're welcome. I've just pushed some code on github for bean validator support. Feel free to test it, don't forget to update dependencies (the new jar is ready). :) Regards, Clément On 22 June 2011 18:17, Matias Blasi wrote: > Thank you very much again Clément! > > I'm going to start migrati

Re: Tapestry5-JQuery Integration and tapestry-beanvalidator

The Class you use is Prototype specific. As long as tapestry5-jquery removes Prototype, you can't use it anymore. jQuery prefers to use plugins -> http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Authoring or widgets (which is a pattern used by jquery ui, also included in tapestry5-jquery) -> http://jqueryui.com/doc

Re: Tapestry5-JQuery Integration and tapestry-beanvalidator

(configuration.add(SymbolConstants.FORM_CLIENT_LOGIC_ENABLED, "false"); within the contributeApplicationDefaults method) 2011/6/22 Clément Uster > You can try to set the symbol SymbolConstants.FORM_CLIENT_LOGIC_ENABLED to > false in your AppModule. > I don't know ho

Re: Tapestry5-JQuery Integration and tapestry-beanvalidator

You can try to set the symbol SymbolConstants.FORM_CLIENT_LOGIC_ENABLED to false in your AppModule. I don't know how tapestry-beanvalidator works but it shouldn't send this file to the client if client validation is disabled... On 22 June 2011 17:54, Matias Blasi wrote: > It is not resolved by

Re: Tapestry5-JQuery Integration and tapestry-beanvalidator

The form component has a clientValidation parameter. On 22 June 2011 17:18, Matias Blasi wrote: > Thank Clément, > > > I will be waiting for this improvement anxiously! > > > Just a question: Is there a quick way for disabling the client-side > validation on tapestry framework? > > > Regards, >

Re: Tapestry5-JQuery Integration and tapestry-beanvalidator

Hi Matias, Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately bean validation doesn't work for the moment with got5 tapestry5-jquery. I've just opened an issue. https://github.com/got5/tapestry5-jquery/issues/42 Maybe you should try to disable client validation for the moment, until I (or someone) solve i

Re: Problem deploying tapestry webapp

When your tomcat is shared with several contexts. You may not want to change the SAXParser for all of the web apps. So, adding the following dependency to your project also works : xerces xerces 2.4.0 On 24 February 2011 19:34, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I wonder h

Re: Render a specific component in an AJAX request

e the generated markup into a JSON object (by advising the PageRenderResponse service), and send that object as a response to the browser. Clément 2011/6/3 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:33:19 -0300, Clément Uster > wrote: > > Hi all, >> > > Hi! > &g

Render a specific component in an AJAX request

Hi all, Let's say my page has an AJAX actionlink. This link has a context that specifies the component name to render in a zone. The @OnEvent method called in my page should return to the browser the body of the component (which name has been specified as a context parameter). It looks like this

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

> > > > This may cause a lot of pain ! >> > > I'm not following you . . . > > I just meant this won't be easy to manipulate generated DOM with java, but if it's the only way, I can deal with that. > > So, can I conclude that the use of @Property wouldn't be recommended >> within components ? Be

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

> > > This is an old "corporate" lib, that isn't supposed to evolve anymore. >> > > This scenario isn't very good . . . Indeed... The component was frozen with tapestry 5.1.0.5 and the need was too urgent to wait for a release. But, ok ! No worries. :) > > It has a simple loop, and I want to

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

de Paula Figueiredo > On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:37:18 -0300, Clément Uster > wrote: > > Thanks for your very quick answer. :) >> > > :) > > What do you suggest if extending component isn't recommended ? >> Rewritting it ? >> > > In many scenar

Re: @Property limitations with java extensions

13 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:11:19 -0300, Clément Uster > wrote: > > Hi everyone, >> > > Hi! > > > Let's imagine I have a component (coming from a component library) that >> has an "index" property. So index

@Property limitations with java extensions

Hi everyone, I have a tricky question for you. :) Let's imagine I have a component (coming from a component library) that has an "index" property. So index has the @Property annotation. I want to create a component that extends the previous component. And I want to test "index"'s value to chang

Re: automatically add a js library to every page in the app

I guess you can override the js stack core from your AppModule. public static void contributeJavaScriptStackSource(MappedConfiguration configuration) { configuration.overrideInstance(InternalConstants.CORE_STACK_NAME, YourJavaScriptStack.class); } and imple