Re: Caching problem?

2016-06-29 Thread Nathan Quirynen
I have found that in one of the applications request filters following is added to every response: Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate Pragma: no-cache On 29/06/16 17:33, Nathan Quirynen wrote: Hi, I have a "weird" problem where this one image won't show up. Never had this p

Caching problem?

2016-06-29 Thread Nathan Quirynen
Hi, I have a "weird" problem where this one image won't show up. Never had this problem before the upgrade to 5.4 and since there have been changes with caching, I guess it has something to do with that. I don't know a lot about the caching Tapestry does (or in general), so I hope someone can

Re: FW: Null pointer on sort with 5.3.8 that didn't occur with 5.3.7

2016-06-29 Thread Dmitry Gusev
Just a correction, that t:add is not just unnecessary, but it will be ignored if you specify the beanModel explicitly: > A comma-seperated list of property names to be added to the > org.apache.tapestry5.beaneditor.BeanModel. Cells for added columns will be > blank unless a cell override is provi

Re: FW: Null pointer on sort with 5.3.8 that didn't occur with 5.3.7

2016-06-29 Thread Chris Poulsen
I'm guessing that something in the sorting part attempts to pull out the value from your passed data source (possibly coerced from a collection). The thing is that your data source does not contain the property (as it is synthetic) and you do not really pull the value from the data source ever, bu

Re: Tapestry 5.4.1 + Hibernate 5 exception

2016-06-29 Thread Pavel Chernyak
Greetings. I compiled tapestry-hibernate-core against hibernate 5.2 and since have 0 problems with hibernate. Maybe you should reconsider to do same thing? On 29 June 2016 at 12:41, M J wrote: > Hi! > > > It seems that Tapestry 5.4.1 is compatible with Hibernate 5.x ( > https://issues.apache.or

FW: Null pointer on sort with 5.3.8 that didn't occur with 5.3.7

2016-06-29 Thread Davide Vecchi
I changed my plan of finding out what causes this difference between 5.3.7 and 5.3.8. Instead I will go with some re-design, using some suggestions I got here. However I am still very interested in knowing whether my way of defining these t:add columns (pasted below) in general has something wro

Tapestry 5.4.1 + Hibernate 5 exception

2016-06-29 Thread M J
Hi! It seems that Tapestry 5.4.1 is compatible with Hibernate 5.x (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2525) and I've seen a few e-mails on this list that suggest people are successfully using 5.0 and 5.1 (http://apache-tapestry-mailing-list-archives.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Hibernate-5-1-

Re: Dynamic Security Role Value - Tynamo Security

2016-06-29 Thread Dmitry Gusev
Just specify the prop: binding prefix explicitly, i.e.: role="prop:dynamicRoles" This parameter just uses literal: binding prefix by default. Also make sure you read this: http://tapestry.apache.org/component-parameters.html#ComponentParameters-BindingExpressions On Wednesday, June 29, 2016, Ma