Re: SSL/TSL for the tapestry tynamo rest

2015-04-17 Thread Kalle Korhonen
I'm not sure what you mean by "mapping the web.xml to the rest pattern" but the easiest scenario is if you want to make your application only TLS accessible. If your TLS endpoint is application container (Tomcat, Jetty, etc..) then you just need edit the server configuration files and point it to y

SSL/TSL for the tapestry tynamo rest

2015-04-17 Thread Boris Horvat
Does anyone have any idea where to start with this? I have enabled the rest using tynamo resteasy so now I am wondering do I need to do anything special in the application to make it SSL/TSL protected? Is it as simple as enabling the SSL/TSL on the host and mapping the web.xml to the rest pattern

Re: AW: Tapestry 5.4 bytecode manipulation

2015-04-17 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:33:50 -0300, Poggenpohl, Daniel wrote: Hi, Hi! It was just an idea without knowing the inner workings or workflow of the bytecode manipulation. I just saw something which looked like the JavaScript problem on first glance without looking into the mechanics. On

Re: Tapestry 5.4 bytecode manipulation

2015-04-17 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 04:54:33 -0300, Lance Java wrote: In theory, that's possible. Tapestry doesn't reference ASM classes, it's only dependency is plastic. So in theory you could have a layer in plastic to choose ASM or javassist as the "provider" (or another byte code library). Yeah, I

AW: Tapestry 5.4 bytecode manipulation

2015-04-17 Thread Poggenpohl, Daniel
Hi, It was just an idea without knowing the inner workings or workflow of the bytecode manipulation. I just saw something which looked like the JavaScript problem on first glance without looking into the mechanics. Regards, Daniel -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Lance Java [mailto:lance

Re: Tapestry 5.4 bytecode manipulation

2015-04-17 Thread Lance Java
On second thought... Why would you want to swap out the the bytecode provider? With clientside javascript it makes sense to choose the provider since you will be directly using jquery or prototype in your own code. Having a single provider reduces the scripts downloaded by the client. But with pl

Re: Tapestry 5.4 bytecode manipulation

2015-04-17 Thread Lance Java
In theory, that's possible. Tapestry doesn't reference ASM classes, it's only dependency is plastic. So in theory you could have a layer in plastic to choose ASM or javassist as the "provider" (or another byte code library). I'd doubt that this is high priority for the tapestry team. I seem to rec

Tapestry 5.4 bytecode manipulation

2015-04-17 Thread Poggenpohl, Daniel
Hi, if I understand your plans regarding Tapestry 5.4 correctly, you uncoupled the JavaScript engine so that you can choose between e.g. Prototype or JQuery. Now, after asking some question on StackOverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29645744/how-do-i-deploy-my-eclipse-tapestry-web-app-