On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:30:39 -0300, Boris Horvat
> wrote:
>
> Sorry Thaigo, but I am not sure what you had in mind.
>> If you think about
>> That's something to avoid as much as possible.
>>
>
> I wasn't
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:09:53 -0300, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
Beaneditor doesn't handle nested entities. Beaneditor (or the underlying
BeanEditForm) renders an html form and nested forms are not allowed.
BeanEditor does *not* render a element, so you can nest a
BeanEditor inside another or i
Beaneditor doesn't handle nested entities. Beaneditor (or the underlying
BeanEditForm) renders an html form and nested forms are not allowed. One of
the simplest things you could do is to render just those field you actually
need to edit from the child object. Or, if you want a complete solution,
t
Some serverside actions (eg autocomplete) expect a well formed request
which may require some request parameters to be present. As you can
imagine, a bot can run regular expressions and hit anything the looks like
a URL. I think it's fine to ignore crawlers from error logging. It's
difficult to do
Thanks for the reply lance.
What does the actual exception mean? Does is it mean a request is being set
with a missing parameter to the autocomplete component? I vaguely remember
seeing this a long time ago while writing a custom autocomplete component.
As far as the logs, I'm hosting the app on
Sounds like a webcrawler / bot to me. Do you have the apache logs? You
could check the user agent header.
As a fix, Google for the list of known bots and their user agent headers
and customised tapestry's exception reporting so that exceptions are not
logged for crawler user agents.
Hi guys, I'm using tapestry 5.4-beta 3 and I have a keyword search on my
website using the auto complete mixin. I'm seeing the following exception
appear in my logs 100's of times. I have been unable to reproduce it, so im
assuming it is happening as a result of bot activity, but I can not
confirm
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:46:17 -0300, java qns wrote:
Hi
Hi!
I am a beginner with tapestry and have a question about messages.
Is it possible to read messages from a different locate other than the
default locale that is set in tapestry web application.
You need to set the Tapestry locale
You should either explicitly persist the inner object itself or add a
cascading option to the relationship mapping. This isn't related to
Tapestry at all, just to the way you're using Hibernate.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:59:37 -0300, nn kk wrote:
Hi I'm trying to create edit form for my hibe
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:57:27 -0300, garz wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
i was just curious about why Tapestry is using a Filter instead of a
Servlet. Does anyone know?
As Lance said, a servlet is and endpoint and it must send a response to a
request. This causes servlets to be useless when you're tryi
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:30:39 -0300, Boris Horvat
wrote:
Sorry Thaigo, but I am not sure what you had in mind.
If you think about
That's something to avoid as much as possible.
I wasn't clear. I meant to say you should avoid passing a whole function
definition. Just passing a function valu
https://github.com/got5/tapestry5-jquery/issues/244#issuecomment-36102130
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:30:39 -0300, Boris Horvat
> wrote:
>
> Sorry Thaigo, but I am not sure what you had in mind.
>>
>> If yo
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:30:39 -0300, Boris Horvat
wrote:
Sorry Thaigo, but I am not sure what you had in mind.
If you think about
That's something to avoid as much as possible.
What are you talking about?
Well first I am not sure why is this the case. If tapestry supports
passing configu
Hi I'm trying to create edit form for my hibernate entities.
For example:
@Entity
@Table(name = "SOME_OBJECT")
public class SomeObject implements Serializable {
...
@ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
@JoinColumn(name = "SUB_OBJECT_ID", nullable = false)
private SubObject su
thank you, thats it :)
On 26.02.2014, at 11:22, Lance Java wrote:
> Well... You can have the Tapestry filter mapped to /* and it can play
> nicely with other servlets.
>
> http://tapestry.apache.org/configuration#Configuration-ConfiguringIgnoredPaths
---
Well... You can have the Tapestry filter mapped to /* and it can play
nicely with other servlets.
http://tapestry.apache.org/configuration#Configuration-ConfiguringIgnoredPaths
yes i know that, but it does not answer my question. :)
On 26.02.2014, at 11:09, Lance Java wrote:
> A filter is passed a reference to the FilterChain which can ultimately pass
> through to the servlet container's own url resolution (ie a resource in the
> war).
>
> A servlet is an endpoint and
A filter is passed a reference to the FilterChain which can ultimately pass
through to the servlet container's own url resolution (ie a resource in the
war).
A servlet is an endpoint and must resolve the URL itself.
Hi,
i was just curious about why Tapestry is using a Filter instead of a Servlet.
Does anyone know?
Regards
garz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestr
19 matches
Mail list logo
