Re: trying to avoid code bloat

2013-05-19 Thread Joakim Olsson
Base-classes need to be located in a package called base on the same level as pages, components, mixins and services. /Joakim On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Ken in Nashua wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Can i construct an abstract page and inject a bunch of services and then > have derived instances

RE: Re : is openJDK compatible with Tapestry 5?

2013-05-19 Thread Ken in Nashua
Sorry Angela... for the dyslexic answer. i meant to say... yes your code should run as platform safe. Ken

trying to avoid code bloat

2013-05-19 Thread Ken in Nashua
Hi Folks, Can i construct an abstract page and inject a bunch of services and then have derived instances extend from that ? I tried it and seeing some weird class format errors. I did it with my model entities. trying to do it with pages and injectables. public abstract class AbstractPage im

Re : is openJDK compatible with Tapestry 5?

2013-05-19 Thread Ken in Nashua
Hi Angela, Off the top of my head form looking at your specs... I would guess to say based on my experience with java which dates back to 1998... no. 64bit should accommodate 32bit apps forward revs should accommodate previous revs. byte codes that is I say go for it Funny when I think ab

RE: best way to integrate a page or component to keep modular

2013-05-19 Thread Ken in Nashua
For instance... given this block of code.. add INFORMATION description here ROSTERS please select a team

best way to integrate a page or component to keep modular

2013-05-19 Thread Ken in Nashua
Hi Folks, I have seen some templates grow are large and cluttered. I am trying to avoid such growth. Can someone list the components at hand to use to prevent this or to be used to maintain maximum modularity? Is there a preferred tapestry component or best practice way to keep tml and java fi

RE: FormFragment checkbox not working

2013-05-19 Thread Nomen Nomanum
Try adding @Persist(PersistenceConstant.FLASH) to your renew and see how would it behave. From: getibi...@outlook.com To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE: FormFragment checkbox not working Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 20:53:42 +0100 Pozdrav Nikola! Could you be more specific about what troub

Re: FormFragment checkbox not working

2013-05-19 Thread Nikola Vulovic
formfragment is shown when checkox "renew" is not checked On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Nikola Vulovic wrote: > tml file >xmlns:t="http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_3.xsd"; > xmlns:p="tapestry:parameter"> > > > > > > > > >

RE: FormFragment checkbox not working

2013-05-19 Thread Nomen Nomanum
Pozdrav Nikola! Could you be more specific about what troubles you? From the code, it looks more-less just fine. What is it supposed to do? Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 17:28:02 +0200 Subject: Re: FormFragment checkbox not working From: nivuk...@gmail.com To: users@tapestry.apache.org tml file

Re: is openJDK compatible with Tapestry 5?

2013-05-19 Thread Dimitris Zenios
I never had problems running tapestry 5 and openjdk On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Angelo Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I got an app running well in : > ava version "1.6.0_21" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_21-b06) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.0-b16, mixed mode) > > no

is openJDK compatible with Tapestry 5?

2013-05-19 Thread Angelo Chen
Hi, I got an app running well in : ava version "1.6.0_21" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_21-b06) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.0-b16, mixed mode) now need to change to a new server, its default java is: java version "1.6.0_24" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11

Re: FormFragment checkbox not working

2013-05-19 Thread Nikola Vulovic
tml file http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_3.xsd"; xmlns:p="tapestry:parameter">

Re: Logging advice on non interface service

2013-05-19 Thread Lance Java
decorate != advise You'll need to read the docs here http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry-ioc-decorators.html On 18 May 2013 15:02, "Boris Horvat" wrote: > Hm...strange this method of mine is not invoked, any idea as to why? > > > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Boris Horvat >wrote: > > > I do