See
http://apache-tapestry-mailing-list-archives.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Safari-for-example-browser-history-and-form-exception-td4942074.html
.
Geoff
On 23/03/2013, at 5:15 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:59:15 -0300, Ken in Nashua wrote:
>
>> Forms require tha
If you'd like to see component writing made simpler, then please vote here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1618
It proposes replacing all that plumbing (store ComponentAction, storeAndExecute
ComponentAction) with event handlers (eg. onPrepare, onValidate, onSuccess,
etc).
This may help:
http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart/examples/component/subformasafield1
On 23/03/2013, at 1:53 AM, Barry Books wrote:
> That's what I tried first and I did not like the path I was headed
> down. Perhaps I'm spoiled by how easy it is to create a component
> th
Hi Folks,
Well I am about to embark on going public with a hockey league web site and I
wanted to reformat these intimidating (well not for developers) for
end-users... stack traces when an exception occurs. And its nice to be able to
use tapestry in such a fashionable way now and the supported
Sorry, wasn't aware of the extra work it was creating. I'm happy for a
solution that keeps you guys focused.
Thanks for your continued tapestry support.
Cheers,
Lance
My impression was Thread Local gives you an instance of an Object for
each thread. If you run Tomcat with 100 thread pool you will have at
most 100 different objects no matter how many connections you have and
since a new connection is handled by an existing thread it will pick
up the values from t
Hi Barry, I'm not sure you understand a Thread Local, it's guaranteed to be
thread safe since it's local to a thread
I would appreciate it if a tapestry committer could chime in with their
thoughts.
Thanks,
Lance
On 22 Mar 2013 20:52, "Barry Books" wrote:
> The method is isInvariant so returni
The method is isInvariant so returning false means the value can
change. This is confusing and it seems like a double negative to me.
public boolean isInvariant() {
return false;
}
The set method is commented out because setting the value would affect
other instances of the component. After th
There are a couple of things wrong with your solution
1. You've implemented a variant binding (isVariant = false) but you have a
no-op implemetation of set(Object value)
This means that the value is 10 in your mixin, but the the value in the
underlying grid component is still 25 (no change)
2. Yo
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:59:15 -0300, Ken in Nashua
wrote:
Forms require that the request method be POST and that the t:formdata
query parameter have values.
Here is, from the error message, the description of what is happening. If
this is a public-facing site, your probably have someone c
I overrode the SymbolBindingFactory with the attached
MySymbolBindingFactory and it appears to work, but I'd like a second
opinion. As I understand it Bindings are cached so my question is will
making the set method a no op instead of an error cause any problems?
I created this mixin to test it.
p
The CDI has support for events in an elegant way:
http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/tutorial/doc/gkhic.html
FlowLogix library supports CDI as well
On Mar 22, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> ive tought this woud be a cool feature, but it does not exist yet.
>
> On Thursday, March 2
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:42:14 -0300, Barry Books wrote:
I had not looked at that way but I think you are correct. You tried to
solve an Apache Foundation mailing list deficiency with Nabble but
Nabble has it's own set of problems.
Actually, we never tried anything with Nabble: it just started
ive tought this woud be a cool feature, but it does not exist yet.
On Thursday, March 21, 2013, Paul Stanton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to trigger an event in a container (Page) which notifies
> embedded components?
>
> I'm hoping to do something like this (pseudo code) :
>
> Page
> {
>
I had not looked at that way but I think you are correct. You tried to
solve an Apache Foundation mailing list deficiency with Nabble but
Nabble has it's own set of problems.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:46:42 -0300, Barry Books w
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:46:42 -0300, Barry Books wrote:
I understand that which is why I said the Apache policy (not the
Tapestry policy) is outdated. If the Apache Foundation had a gateway
anyone could post thru then perhaps most of the issues would be
resolved.
Again this is not a complaint b
That's what I tried first and I did not like the path I was headed
down. Perhaps I'm spoiled by how easy it is to create a component
that's not used as a form element. I was really just curious if I was
missing something obvious.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> On 22.03.2013 13:43, Barry Books wrote:
>> Not a complaint about the Tapestry list (or PMC members) but I though
>> I voice my opinion about the policy to see if there are others like
>> me. I think I understand the reasoning behind the Apache
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:56:25 -0300, Barry Books wrote:
I did and I'm using store() to make it work, it just seems messy when
all I really want is something like this
Have you tried subclassing AbstractField?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
--
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:47:03 -0300, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
2. There is no real built in archive system which makes web searches a
problem. Nabble is considered a hosting site and hosting sites are
blocked by my work firewall.
tapestry.markmail.org - excellent searching and filtering capabilities
I did and I'm using store() to make it work, it just seems messy when
all I really want is something like this
DateRange implements Label {
@Parameter
private String label;
@Parameter
@Property
private Range range;
onPrepareFromSubmit() {
if ( range == null ) {
range = new Range();
On 22.03.2013 13:43, Barry Books wrote:
> Not a complaint about the Tapestry list (or PMC members) but I though
> I voice my opinion about the policy to see if there are others like
> me. I think I understand the reasoning behind the Apache mailing list
> policy but I think it's outdated. To me it
Hi Barry
Have you looked at FormSupport particularly store() and storeAndExecute()
http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/FormSupport.html#storeAndExecute(T,
org.apache.tapestry5.ComponentAction)
You can register ComponentActions there.
regards
Taha
On Mar 22
Usually creating Tapestry components is easy but I've run in a
problem. I've kinda solved it but I'm wondering if I'm missing
something.
I'd like to create a component called DateRange which contains two
DateFields and takes a parameter of type Range which contains a
startDate and endDate. The sol
I use a collection of maps all the time for both form input and grid
output. I have a report system that stores sql in the database and
uses a beaneditform for query parameters and a grid to display the
result set. It's turned out to be extremely useful. I use a
PropertyConduit just like you sugges
This has been a source of problems for me also. I'll mess with it
today and report back. I think it should be possible to create a new
binding then change the default from
symbol:SomeSymbol
to
default:symbol:SomeSymbol
would that work for you?
--
Not a complaint about the Tapestry list (or PMC members) but I though
I voice my opinion about the policy to see if there are others like
me. I think I understand the reasoning behind the Apache mailing list
policy but I think it's outdated. To me it has two problems.
1. I cannot participate in th
Uli, this is the first time I've heard that you had to moderate Nabble
posts. Sorry to hear that. I withdraw my objection.
On Mar 22, 2013 5:27 AM, "Ulrich Stärk" wrote:
> First, Nabble users don't subscribe, meaning I have to moderate Nabble
> mails on a daily basis.
> Nabble won't or can't forc
First, Nabble users don't subscribe, meaning I have to moderate Nabble mails on
a daily basis.
Nabble won't or can't force users to subscribe users prior to posting.
Second, Nabble eats code listings etc. leaving users to wonder why their emails
aren't displayed
properly to "normal" users, possi
29 matches
Mail list logo
