Yup, figured it out already. Thanks Steve.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Disable-clientside-x-on-serverside-validation-tp5713893p5713937.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
That's not a server class, that's done in JavaScript. Look at the
createUI() function in Tapestry.ErrorPopup around line 1300 in
tapestry.js
You may have to monkey patch the JS with your own function(s) / class.
Steve.
--
Steve Eynon
---
"If at first you don't succeed,
Importantly, the critical thing done with an Element, rendering markup to a
character stream, walks the list and doesn't use this method.
Earlier versions of Tapestry uses an internal ArrayList for storing the
children; this was changed in 5.1 or 5.2 to help reduce the memory
footprint of pages.
I figured this out, just needed to override the js.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Disable-clientside-x-on-serverside-validation-tp5713893p5713933.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
I straightened out a number of startup deadlock issues for 5.2. They can
be very challenging to root out.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Jens Breitenstein TOC <
jens.breitenst...@t-o-c.biz> wrote:
> Hi Howard,
>
> In the past we had severe problems with T5 when a tomcat was started under
> hea
Hi Howard,
In the past we had severe problems with T5 when a tomcat was started under
heavy load. It deadlocked reproduceble in the classloader / bytecode
instrumentation area. Thus we workaround this issue but clicking the index page
manually ones before adding the tomcat to the loadbalancer (
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:35:07 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
Have you checked http://tapestryxpath.sourceforge.net
I'm aware of the library but I haven't used it. I can only assume that it
makes use of Element.getChildren() too (unless it accesses the private
"firstChild" and "nextSibling" fields w
> Have you checked http://tapestryxpath.sourceforge.net
I'm aware of the library but I haven't used it. I can only assume that it
makes use of Element.getChildren() too (unless it accesses the private
"firstChild" and "nextSibling" fields which I highly doubt).
> Have you done any benchmarks to kn
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 04:57:57 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
When manipulating the serverside DOM in a mixin etc, the only public API
for accessing a node's children is via Element.getChildren().
Have you checked http://tapestryxpath.sourceforge.net/? I haven't yet, but
I should. :)
The getCh
Steven, do you happen to know what class handles the tjq-error-popup div?
After looking at this closely, it might make better sense to create a new
Validation Decorator, I was using css to alter the x img to a V pointer from
the bubble to the field. Might be easier to just include that with the
tjq
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:34:11 -0300, Massimo Lusetti
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
The company I work for uses Apache Solr. I've talked to some friends
that
work at another company and they seem to be happy with it too, even
having a
backend
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> The company I work for uses Apache Solr. I've talked to some friends that
> work at another company and they seem to be happy with it too, even having a
> backend server written in C++. :P
The more I look the more I see a goo
Right, I should known that it will not lock when there are some readers.
Denis
Jun 14, 2012 v 7:28 PM, Howard Lewis Ship:
> I'm already somewhat unhappy at the complexity of the code; I'd prefer not
> to make it any more complicated. I think race conditions on the write lock
> are going to be p
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Geoff Callender
wrote:
> See if this helps: the Wizard Using Form Fragments example on:
>
> http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart
Yeah - don't know how I missed that before - that looks like the
perfect solution and is nearly exactly the app flow I
I'm pretty sure that hidden fields will not be validated by tapestry.
You can wrap non-hidden fields in a
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Adding-confirmation-step-to-form-tp5713910p5713922.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
When manipulating the serverside DOM in a mixin etc, the only public API for
accessing a node's children is via Element.getChildren().
The getChildren() method creates a new ArrayList, adds all the children and
returns it which I think is inneficcient. I would have expected
getChildren() to retur
See if this helps: the Wizard Using Form Fragments example on:
http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart
Cheers, Geoff
On Friday, 15 June 2012, Paul Stanton wrote:
> The simplest way would be to save your form data into a bean, and use the
> @Persist annotation on your bean so you c
You can always write a mixin to tweak the DOM generated by any component. You
could write a mixin to add disabled="true" to all the checkboxes and attach
it to the checklist.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Checklist-disabled-possible-bug-tp5713681p5713919.h
> I was testing it with 0.0.3-Snap
No, please try this code with the normal (non snapshot) zbreadcrumbs
dependency.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/BreadCrumbsModule-error-tp5713794p5713918.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
1.
only on the server
2.
i will check everything again, and if, upload / test again and give
feedback asap.
3.
i was testing it with 0.0.3-Snap
thx
2012/6/15 Lance Java [via Tapestry] <
ml-node+s1045711n5713916...@n5.nabble.com>
> For better or worse, this is a new exception.
> 1. Is this failur
20 matches
Mail list logo
