Re: chenillekit

2011-05-18 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Gradle! On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Chris Collins wrote: > >> Would you mind sharing the reasoning behind switching from Maven?  I am late >> to the party and only just switched to maven :-} > > Nothing special... I got all my build

Re: how to make tapestry ignore processing some paths

2011-05-18 Thread hese
ok it is "reportingservice/.*". got it. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/how-to-make-tapestry-ignore-processing-some-paths-tp4407839p4407934.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: how to make tapestry ignore processing some paths

2011-05-18 Thread hese
Strange, I added this - public static void contributeIgnoredPathsFilter(Configuration configuration) { configuration.add("/reportingservice/*"); } expecting all paths starting with /reportingservice wont be handled by tapestry. But what happens is only if the path is ht

Re: how to make tapestry ignore processing some paths

2011-05-18 Thread hese
Thanks Rich, I added it to AppModule. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/how-to-make-tapestry-ignore-processing-some-paths-tp4407839p4407889.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: how to make tapestry ignore processing some paths

2011-05-18 Thread Rich M
Contributions and such should be in the Module class, typically AppModule. I believe that was omitted from that code excerpt because the rest of the page was in the context of the Module class. On 05/18/2011 05:02 PM, hese wrote: Hi, I dont want tapestry to process some urls, and want it to b

Re: how to make tapestry ignore processing some paths

2011-05-18 Thread hese
Ok, I got the answer in another site http://tapestry.apache.org/configuration.html Thanks -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/how-to-make-tapestry-ignore-processing-some-paths-tp4407839p4407851.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble

how to make tapestry ignore processing some paths

2011-05-18 Thread hese
Hi, I dont want tapestry to process some urls, and want it to be handled by another servlet. Here - http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/guide/conf.html, it is mentioned to do it in a method like this... public static void contributeIgnoredPathsFilter(Configuration configuration) {

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread 9902468
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > > Nice! Please update the JIRA issues to include this information. > I updated http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1366 and also added link to this discussion (to Nabble.) - Ville -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nab

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Wed, 18 May 2011 16:41:46 -0300, 9902468 wrote: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: Wouldn't Tapestry reordering elements come in the , , everything else order be sufficient? I do think adding a Tapestry element just for that solving this issue is overkill. Yep, I think that

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread Josh Canfield
Hey Thiago. > public void afteRender(MarkupWriter writer) { >        Element ie9 = writer.getDocument().getElementById("ie9metatag"); >        ie9.getParent().moveToTop(ie9); > } > I'm pretty sure that this won't work because at the point this code runs none of Tapestry elements have been injecte

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread 9902468
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > > > Wouldn't Tapestry reordering elements come in the , , > everything else order be sufficient? I do think adding a Tapestry element > just for that solving this issue is overkill. > > Yep, I think that would do it. Of topic: Could it be that IE m

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Wed, 18 May 2011 16:05:58 -0300, 9902468 wrote: Exactly :) As I pointed out none of us can change this unfortunate reality (If you can, I have seriously under estimated your influence capabilities :)) - If I could change Microsoft the world would be a better place to live . . . :P

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread 9902468
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > > On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:12:15 -0300, 9902468 > > Microsoft is to blame for having a backward compatibility problem at > first and then a fix depending on a meta tag that should be the first > thing inside . This was quite a bad decision from them. > >

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:12:15 -0300, 9902468 wrote: I've battled this one previously, but there never was any real resolution if I remember correctly. I'd try this * Give an id to the meta tag. * Add this to my layout component or in a mixin (not tested): public void afteRender(MarkupWrit

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread Josh Canfield
I don't know of something exists, but here is a reasonably simple solution: Create a "meta" component that that collects the values and injects them at the top of the head element at the end of the rendering process. The following code was compiled and briefly tested in 5.2.5. It collects the val

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread 9902468
Ah, now I found the original IE9 thread: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-with-Prototype-1-7-td3288189.html - Ville -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/X-UA-Compatible-IE-9-tp4406801p4407107.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archi

Re: X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread 9902468
I've battled this one previously, but there never was any real resolution if I remember correctly. I think T5 should honor the order of added metatags with perhaps some additional tags like . (And same for the added js + stylesheet + what not declarations.) Likewise IE9 support wasn't top notch, s

X-UA-Compatible & IE 9

2011-05-18 Thread Rich M
Hi, has anyone else had trouble with getting the X-UA-Compatible meta tag working in IE9 with Tapestry? I have verified that my rendered HTML page has the tag in the element, but going into Developer Tools it says the Document Mode for the page is not the one I set it to. The reason I men

Re: chenillekit

2011-05-18 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Chris Collins wrote: > Would you mind sharing the reasoning behind switching from Maven?  I am late > to the party and only just switched to maven :-} Nothing special... I got all my builds running smoothly 80% of the times or running at 80% of features, none is

Re: chenillekit

2011-05-18 Thread Chris Collins
Yeh I could get to the website, noticed the last published date and when I went wondering the maven repo that was mentioned on the site I only saw 1.1.0. That version exploded with T5.2.5. I did a search and found someones comment that there was a 1.3.2. which seems to work. This project is c

Re: chenillekit

2011-05-18 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Michael Dukaczewski wrote: > Yes, the site is reachable, but ... > "Last Published: 2009-09-18" > ... so it is almost dead. Sure the site is dead and I'll not fix till I'll switch to something other then maven but the maven repo is updated -- Massimo http://mer

Re: chenillekit

2011-05-18 Thread Michael Dukaczewski
Yes, the site is reachable, but ... "Last Published: 2009-09-18" ... so it is almost dead. Am 18.05.2011 11:55, schrieb Massimo Lusetti: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Chris Collins > wrote: > >> Does anyone know if chenillekit is dead? A quick play trying to use it with >> t5.2.5 failed

Re: BeanEditForm: What's happening to my object parameter?

2011-05-18 Thread Geoff Callender
Added to JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1527 On 10/05/2011, at 9:39 PM, Geoff Callender wrote: > Nope, it's like Rich said: onPrepare() is being called twice during the > render phase, and then the object disappears! > > Yet, when you replace BeanEditForm with a Form around a

Re: which is better for AJAX Implementation in Tapestry 4.0

2011-05-18 Thread LLTYK
This is in my pom: org.apache.tapestry tapestry-framework 4.1.6 org.apache.tapestry tapestry-core

Re: chenillekit

2011-05-18 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Chris Collins wrote: > Does anyone know if chenillekit is dead?  A quick play trying to use it with > t5.2.5 failed and seems the mailing lists on google don't exist anymore? It stands still at http://chenillekit.codehaus.org -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot

chenillekit

2011-05-18 Thread Chris Collins
Does anyone know if chenillekit is dead? A quick play trying to use it with t5.2.5 failed and seems the mailing lists on google don't exist anymore? C - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additiona