Ok,
the live 5.1 docs still point to the nightly docs @ formos, which is out of
date, which I used when I upgraded. That clarifies some findings nicely.
Is it ok to use @Retain with
@Retain
private BeanModel _model;
{
_model = _beanModelSource.createDisplayModel(User.class,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:22 PM, 9902468 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> First of all our software seems, if possible, even more snappier when run
> with 5.2, so thank you everyone how have contributed.
>
> Now let's get to issues I encountered:
>
> 1. Asset protection: The documentation is not yet there, as i
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:22 PM, 9902468 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> First of all our software seems, if possible, even more snappier when run
> with 5.2, so thank you everyone how have contributed.
>
> Now let's get to issues I encountered:
>
> 1. Asset protection: The documentation is not yet there, as i
Thanks for the info.
I'd like to hear what we should do in the long run whit @Retain? Is it
recommended to initialize everything again and again and never use @Retain
anymore? When the page pool is dropped is the @Retain dropped also?
- Ville
Robert Zeigler wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2010, at
On Aug 17, 2010, at 8/1711:22 PM , 9902468 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> First of all our software seems, if possible, even more snappier when run
> with 5.2, so thank you everyone how have contributed.
>
> Now let's get to issues I encountered:
>
> 1. Asset protection: The documentation is not yet ther
Hi,
First of all our software seems, if possible, even more snappier when run
with 5.2, so thank you everyone how have contributed.
Now let's get to issues I encountered:
1. Asset protection: The documentation is not yet there, as it still speaks
about AssetPathAuthorizer. How should I fix the
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:08:27 -0300, Pierce Wetter
wrote:
Er, yeah, but my point was that the first zone doesn't get a random
suffix, its only the nested zone that does.
Yep, I wasn't clear in first place: I should have said that zones (and
other ClientElement objects) get a random suf
On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:33:09 -0300, Pierce Wetter wrote:
>
>>> To avoid creating elements with repeated ids, when you don't provide one
>>> explicitly, the components generate an id with a random suffix.
>> Well, that's not
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:33:09 -0300, Pierce Wetter
wrote:
To avoid creating elements with repeated ids, when you don't provide
one explicitly, the components generate an id with a random suffix.
Well, that's not quite true. That's why it seems like a bug to me.
Will get generated a
On Aug 17, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:40:36 -0300, Pierce Wetter wrote:
>
>> Yes, but id kind-of-sort-of gets set by t:id already if its not set.
>> Setting the client id as a workaround to force the id seems bassackwards to
>> me. I'm won
There is typo in what i wrote, should be
public void contributeValidationMessagesSource(OrderedConfiguration
configuration) {
configuration.override("Default","/org/example/myapp/validators/myValidationMessages");
}
instead of that what is, but i made it writing here, not while te
congraz Pablo!
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Pablo dos Reis wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My GSOC 2010 project is finishing
> Then I uploaded the code example in my tapestry wiki page [0]
> There are a link called "App Example"[1] to code
>
> In this project I created
>
> - Drag and Drop
It is a politically correct attempt at saying "ass backwards" ... :-)
mrg
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> I'm not an English native speaker, so what's 'bassackwards'? :)
-
To unsubscrib
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:40:36 -0300, Pierce Wetter
wrote:
Yes, but id kind-of-sort-of gets set by t:id already if its not set.
Setting the client id as a workaround to force the id seems bassackwards
to me. I'm wondering if this is related to 1096.
To avoid creating elements with repeat
On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:51:00 -0300, Pierce Wetter wrote:
>
>> Ah, just found that in Jira.
>> So shouldn't setting t:id set the id as well?
>
> They're different ids: t:id is server-side, id is client-side, so I really
> don'
i haven't noticed any problems with helios and m2eclipse (i use 0.10.2)
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 13:13, wrote:
> There are known bugs in recent versions of the m2eclipse plugin (0.9.9x so
> far as I recall)... but apparently they are fixed in the latest version
> (0.10), but I haven't tried thi
I have tried repeatedly decorating and advising ClassNameLocator, it doesn't
work, my methods are never hit. To be sure, I tried to replace the service
name with another known service (ClientInfrastructure), which worked. Does
anyone see someting wrong with the method below? Or is it not possible t
Hi, and welcome everyone.
I'm pretty new to tapestry, so still learning a lot about it, thus there is
large probability my question is a basic one.
I've encountered a problem with overriding default application wide
validation messages.
My application package is org.example.myapp, and i've p
There are known bugs in recent versions of the m2eclipse plugin (0.9.9x so far
as I recall)... but apparently they are fixed in the latest version (0.10), but
I haven't tried this version so I can't confirm. I have reverted to a
historical version instead (0.9.8x or earlier) found here:
http:/
Hi,
can't give you an exact advice about that Tomcat thing but maybe using Jetty is
an alternative for you?
I always use Jetty (mvn clean jetty:run, using the run configuration of
eclipse) for development. Live-Class-Reloading is working better with it and...
well it's nice to have only eclips
Nice :) Thank you Pablo
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Pablo dos Reis wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My GSOC 2010 project is finishing
> Then I uploaded the code example in my tapestry wiki page [0]
> There are a link called "App Example"[1] to code
>
> In this project I created
>
> - Drag and Dr
21 matches
Mail list logo
