Hi
As this concept has been introduced in 5.2, i am currently looking at the
first purpose of it. Where have you implemented the security layer in the
Tapestry pipeline ?
Should you security request filter be inserted after the
InitializeActivePageName filter solve your problem ?
Actually, i am
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Christophe Cordenier
wrote:
> I am currently working on this JIRA, i have seen that the getActivatePage()
> is only called to pre allocate names in Form component so it should have. So
> i guess the page you are returning contains a Form.
Right and thanks so much
Hi,
Two T5 apps: main and sub, the sub has a few pages, and might run in
different machines, I'd like that the main app can bring up sub's different
pages, sort of embedding sub's page in the main app, any good approach to
this? Thanks.
Angelo
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble
Take a look at
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.2-dev/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/test/SeleniumLauncher.html
I've run into the same problem. It makes running your test cases from your IDE
very inconvenient.
You could create your own base class that calls the launcher methods without
havin
Hi Kalle,
I am currently working on this JIRA, i have seen that the getActivatePage()
is only called to pre allocate names in Form component so it should have. So
i guess the page you are returning contains a Form.
Despite it sound right that PageResponseRenderer should set the active page,
don't
On a sidenote, "Check out these lines in AppModule" should be: "Check out these
lines in TapestryModule".
As for the directory vs. file expectation, you're correct: note the definitions
in TapestryModule below: tapestry.blackbird.path is the path to the blackbird
install, and is a directory. t
