Hi Everyone,
I'm just finishing my first tapestry (sub)project!! Woohoo! What a
learning experience.
I'd love to go back and pull apart the code, but this project isn't
mine to take home and pull apart, and I don't have time on-the-job to
do it because there's the next project already in t
You can implement onException() to catch exceptions thrown from page
event handlers (see
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.1/guide/event.html), or, though I
know you don't like this, for handling known exceptions in a more
generic manner you could use Tynamo's tapestry-exceptionpage module
(http
We have an ajax intensive project for which we need to better handle
problems such as session timeouts.
Most of our ajax event handlers will return a MultizoneUpdate, and
currently will run into a NullPointerException if the session has timed out.
Instead what I'd like these listeners to do i
That was simple and effective. Thanks!
Chuck
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:15:33 -0300, Chuck Kring
wrote:
Hi everybody,
Hi!
I don't want to handle this as an event on the watched page because
I'm not sure how Tapestry will handle the event if the server
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:15:33 -0300, Chuck Kring
wrote:
Hi everybody,
Hi!
I don't want to handle this as an event on the watched page because I'm
not sure how Tapestry will handle the event if the server has restarted.
It will, no doubt about that.
So, it is possible for a Tapestry pa
Hi everybody,
I need to create a watchdog on a page that reloads the entire page when
I detect the server has restarted.
So far, my approach is to retrieve and image from the Tapestry web app
by setting an image src field, then reloading or not based upon onload
vs.onerror event handlers.
Hi Rich,
Yep same guy, guilty as charged. This may not be the best solution, you may
get some better advice from some of the more experienced Tapestry people on
the forum, but it's the approach I used. The post I included earlier was
indeed about just ensuring a specific order was enforced in th
Ah, thanks that seems like a start, but I'm having some issues with it.
The call to the constructor in the decorator method throws a
NullPointerException, it seems because there is an issue with the
ClientInfrastructure passed into the decorator method. Also, the logic
in your example seems t
Issue created:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1212
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/Validation-in-component-using-onValidate-method-tp5315887p5317888.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
The only difference being that when refactoring the internals,
tapestry-hibernate will be refactored along with tapestry-core.
Because ChenilleKit is external, it may suffer when tapestry-core
internals are refactored. There's no easy solution for this, beyond a
dialog of what internal services nee
The fact that it is part of tapestry /does/ count and /does/ make a difference.
It means that we, the committers, have to fix it to work with any
non-backwards-compatible changes that are made to internal classes /before/ a
release can happen.
Since the use of internal services is hidden by the m
See this post for a possible workaround:
http://markmail.org/message/fsu22hjz4bxvpczb?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Etapestry%
2Eusers+MyClientInfrastructure
I don't know why this hasn't been raised more often as an issue with
blackbird and IE. I think blackbird has been removed from T5.2.0 in favour
of
On Jul 19, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:18:14 -0300, Pierce Wetter wrote:
>
>> On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Andreas Andreou wrote:
>>
>>> Pierce raises a valid point though - tapestry-hibernate ideally shouldn't
>>> need
>>> to depend on int
Hi,
I'm aware blackbird.js is not directly Tapestry code, but I'm looking
for advice on how to handle an issue with the blackbird.js file. I had
been having problems with getting the fixed background image in my
tapestry webapp to stay fixed in Internet Explorer. I'd given up
searching for a
Hello all,
i have a question about ajax form submission in T5. I was needed checkbox
implementation which 'onClick' submits entire form linked to zone (wrapped
inside zone).
I ended up with simple implementation, which i post at the end of message.
Everything is fine, except i found that before
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
>
>> But one suggestion. Maybe tapestry should log on warn level if someone
>> creates onValidate method with no parameters, else someone may be as
>> confused as I was. I don't see any purpose of onValidate without
>> parameters.
>
> That's a very good id
Thanks Geoff for the link, it's more or less what I wanted to do but I've
found a way to do what I want by manipulating DOM.
For information, in case it can help someone, here is the final HTML code I
wanted :
The field must be 16 digits long
Test :
I've created a custo
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:02:41 -0300, Michal Gruca
wrote:
I'm just blind or dumb. My code was almost same as example I provided,
with onValidate metod without any value. That's why I didn't saw any
value. That solves the problem, thanks.
This happens. :)
But one suggestion. Maybe tapestr
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
>
> Hi!
> This way, the developer can prevent the setter method of being invoked
> with an invalid value.
>
Ok, I get it now. First I wanted to ask how are You supposed to get that
value, but example I wanted to use (from bottom of this page
http://tapestr
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:23:26 -0300, Michal Gruca
wrote:
Hi all,
Hi!
I'm using tapestry for some time but for first time I cannot find correct
solution by myself. My problem is with validation in onValidate method. I
get that onValidate is called for every component inside form and
onValid
Hi all,
I'm using tapestry for some time but for first time I cannot find correct
solution by myself. My problem is with validation in onValidate method. I
get that onValidate is called for every component inside form and
onValidateForm is called after all other onValidates but I don't get why
fir
> Well that's definetely not a bug. Andreas talked right, he said
> "ideally", but tapestry-hibernate is a library around (very near) the
> core framework so if it choose to depend on an "internal"
> implementation it's a library's owner choice. What has not to be done
> is to public (in any way)
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Pierce Wetter wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Andreas Andreou wrote:
>
>> Pierce raises a valid point though - tapestry-hibernate ideally shouldn't
>> need
>> to depend on internal core / ioc classes
>
> Exactly! Is that a bug in tapestry or tapestry-h
23 matches
Mail list logo
