Thanks for the inputs Peter.
I had done some research on the ill effects of reverse AJAX but the advantages
of having the feature outweighed its disadvantage. My idea of Jetty was that
of a light weight embeddable HTTP server which can be used for unit testing or
in situations where high load
yes, you are right thread.sleep does not look like the right approach, it does
not scale either. thanks
- Original Message
From: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Tue, 25 May, 2010 6:41:08 AM
Subject: Re: comet implementation issue
On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:45:16 -
On May 28, 2010, at 9:15 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2010 19:41:45 -0300, Norman Franke
wrote:
Since I re-populate the list in the onPrepare() call, I'm not sure
why it's doing this. The volatile option is not use anywhere, and
if I tried, I get a NPE anyway.
On Fri, 28 May 2010 19:41:45 -0300, Norman Franke wrote:
Since I re-populate the list in the onPrepare() call, I'm not sure why
it's doing this. The volatile option is not use anywhere, and if I
tried, I get a NPE anyway.
Loop's volatile parameter is deprecated. Use formState="none" instea
On a query page in my T5.1.0.5 app, I have a loop that is embedded in
a form. The loop displays the query results in a table with a checkbox
to allow the user to select a subset of the items. On one page, I keep
getting database errors as Tapestry tries to
restoreStateFromStoredClientValue
On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:52:24 -0300, Josh Canfield
wrote:
I'm not in front of a computer right now so I can't verify this, but I
don't think this affects the id's of other elements in the zone, does
it? I believe we are looking for the form element in the zone, which as
far as I can tell,
ah... thanks thiago. That would work.
Cheers,
Abangkis
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:24:45 -0300, abangkis wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>
> Hi!
>
>> is there any property to set a field in beaneditform to read only ?
>
> Not without over
You can try using a different method for finding the form. If you
know it's the only form in the zone you can use
Or give the zone a fixed client id (id parameter) instead of letting
Tapestry do that.
I'm not in front of a computer right now so I can't verify this, but I
don't think this
On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:24:45 -0300, abangkis wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
is there any property to set a field in beaneditform to read only ?
Not without overriding the block that renders the field i.e. using
o .
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate
Hello,
is there any property to set a field in beaneditform to read only ?
I'm creating a page that edit my object, but i didn't want some field
to be changed by the user. For now i'm creating a bean display and
bean edit form in the same page. then excluding the read only field
from the beanedit
Just checked in a fix. Man, it is so much easier to work on tapx than
Tapestry; pure Git, no hassels. Your just lucky I'm working for the
right client today, i.e., that fix is a priority for my client as well
as for you.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Yep. Looks lik
Yep. Looks like yahoo-dom-event.js is always minimized. I'll check in a fix.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Joost Schouten (ml)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started using the RichTextEditor in the tapx-yui package (nice work btw!)
> which works fine when running under production-mode=false, but when in
Hi,
I started using the RichTextEditor in the tapx-yui package (nice work
btw!) which works fine when running under production-mode=false, but
when in production-mode, I get the exception at [1]. I am not quite sure
but it looks like there is a minified asset missing. Am I correct?
cheers,
J
On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:22:10 -0300, Josh Canfield
wrote:
When elements are loaded into a zone their id's get modified to ensure
they are still unique in the page.
You can try using a different method for finding the form. If you know
it's the only form in the zone you can use
Or give t
When elements are loaded into a zone their id's get modified to ensure
they are still unique in the page.
You can try using a different method for finding the form. If you know
it's the only form in the zone you can use
$('testzone').select('form')[0]
Or you can put a class on it:
$('testz
, sorry wrong list.
-Original Message-
From: Jim O'Callaghan [mailto:jc1000...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 28 May 2010 13:37
To: 'Tapestry users'
Subject: T5_EASY_FCKEDITOR and T 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Is there was any plan to release a version of t5easyfckeditor that works
with the T5.2.0-SNAPSHOT? At
OK - I'm halfway through now (I think so, at least) :-)
I believe that I need to "hook" into the Tapestry.ZONE_UPDATED_EVENT event
when my t:zone is updated with the t:block containing the form - this is
what I do:
Event.observe('zoneTest', Tapestry.ZONE_UPDATED_EVENT, function()
{
ale
Thanks Robin for the reply.
You were right about the problem. I didn't use $ in my call for box to open,
but I wasn't aware that fancy box jquery itself script used $ everywhere.
After I replaced it with "jQuery" string it worked like a charm.
Thanks!
Regards,
Nikola
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10
very strange. well i never used LinkSubmit. but as i said, the code works as
expected (at least from my point of view :) ) only if you change the if
statement. "as is" the form never gets submitted. i know almost nothing
about js, and very little about t5. perhaps my code won't work in some
comple
Is there was any plan to release a version of t5easyfckeditor that works
with the T5.2.0-SNAPSHOT? At the moment I'm getting the following stack
trace at startup:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Error invoking constructor
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.ClasspathAssetAliasManagerImpl(AssetP
Don't know, I only copied the code from LinkSubmit and did some very minor
changes, not including the stuff you're listing here :)
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:09 PM, paha wrote:
>
> Hi Inge,
>
> tried you code today. doesn't seem to work. maybe i'm using it incorrectly.
> i have following template
Hi Inge,
tried you code today. doesn't seem to work. maybe i'm using it incorrectly.
i have following template
>
>t:mixins="anySubmit" t:event="selected"
> t:clientEvent="change"/>
>
>
>
this part in if
if (onsubmit == undefined || onsubmit.call
I tried this example (and some non-ajax permutations) and i indeed see
different behavior with cookies enabled vs. disabled.
If that's not expected, then a new issue should be raised in jira.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:51, Paul Stanton wrote:
> well, its worth discussing - the question being sho
Hi! Just saw your email.
Dialog component is still under development and will be released with
1.1.0.
Anyway, there is a test application bundled with this project. Each
component is tested in a custom page which could also be used a sample.
You may be interested by:
http://github.com/got5/tapestr
Nice, it seems awesome! I'm looking forward to try it!
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Peter Niederwieser wrote:
> Dear Tapestry community,
>
> the Spock team is very happy to announce the release of Spock 0.4, the
> Enterprise-ready testing framework for Java and Groovy apps (official
> releas
Dear Tapestry community,
the Spock team is very happy to announce the release of Spock 0.4, the
Enterprise-ready testing framework for Java and Groovy apps (official release
notes). As you may know, Spock also provides an extension for testing Tapestry
5 apps. The main functions of this extensi
26 matches
Mail list logo
