I agree and I favor Josh's suggestion. I don't agree with Howard that it's making things more
complicated. Just in code but that's none of the users' business. We could just have this fallback
but only document the new behaviour.
Uli
On 11.03.2010 08:17, Igor Drobiazko wrote:
A fixed name lik
Agree with Igor. Ok, so it might trip up a few new users, but at least
it fails fast and the reason is very understandable. Why remove
additional flexibility that is already there. The simplest solution is
to emphasize this in the documentation with bold letters and be done
with it.
Kalle
On Wed
A fixed name like "AppModule" would have been a much better decision but it
is just too late. We should *never* deprecate or remove any of the naming
conventions. There are a lot of online articles and few books on T5
describing the convention. Just imagine a frustration of someone who just
read an
I have a page that uses ChenilleKit to pop up a window that contains a
component. That component contains a form enclosed in a zone. The form get
submitted under a variety of circumstances primarily for the purpose of
storing the state and redrawing the form based on some option the user just
sel
Hi,
Could you just add a record to the List before it goes onto rendering? Are
there hooks for that?
- I'm only new to tapestry, just throwing an idea out there.
Cheers
Chris
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Jagadesh Paladugula <
jagadeshpaladug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Christophe Cordenie
Hi Christophe Cordenier,
If I use empty parameter, the default grid implementation renders the empty
block(which does'nt have grid look and feel).
But my use case is some thing like, generate the grid structure with a row
which says "no data present".
Please find the attachement for more clarity
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Josh Canfield wrote:
> I've always just used AppModule...
>
> How about:
> look for Module
> look for AppModule
> Throw exception "can't find Module or AppModule"
>
That's making it more complicated, not less.
> Josh
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Howard L
> Should the Hidden component preserve the id? In my TML I have:
Probably, but it doesn't. You can look at the source for Hidden and
it's a very simple component. It doesn't output the id.
You can try this:
var form = $('contact');
var input = form['jumpToPage'];
from http://www.prototypejs.or
I've always just used AppModule...
How about:
look for Module
look for AppModule
Throw exception "can't find Module or AppModule"
Josh
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Seems like we keep hitting the error where people change web.xml,
> rename their filter, and are con
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:05:22 -0300, Robert Hailey
wrote:
On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
I think the way that T5 locates the module class from the filter name
is over-engineered.
I think it should just be fixed as "AppModule", in the services
package, end of story.
Th
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Robert Hailey wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
>> Seems like we keep hitting the error where people change web.xml,
>> rename their filter, and are confused that their AppModule is no
>> longer loaded.
>
> That is precisely my issu
On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Seems like we keep hitting the error where people change web.xml,
rename their filter, and are confused that their AppModule is no
longer loaded.
That is precisely my issue! IT WORKS! Thanks.
I think the way that T5 locates the module cl
Seems like we keep hitting the error where people change web.xml,
rename their filter, and are confused that their AppModule is no
longer loaded.
I think the way that T5 locates the module class from the filter name
is over-engineered.
I think it should just be fixed as "AppModule", in the servic
Did you modify web.xml?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Robert Hailey wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> I'm just now trying my hand at Tapestry, but have managed to mess something
> up and get really confused...
>
> I started with the tutorial code, added a few pages, added hibernate
> configuratio
Greetings all,
I'm just now trying my hand at Tapestry, but have managed to mess
something up and get really confused...
I started with the tutorial code, added a few pages, added hibernate
configuration, and started trying to make an login/authentication
filter.
I thought everything w
Hi everyone,
Should the Hidden component preserve the id? In my TML I have:
However, the generated HTML looks like:
Makes it hard to use $('jumpToPage') in my JavaScript to set the value. :-)
If I switch to:
It works, but of course, that just feels wrong. Thoughts?
Thanks in advance
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
The limit hasn't change, and is enforced by Javassist and/or the JVM.
However, 5.2 may be adding more constructor arguments than 5.1 to
accomplish the same thing. I may need to think about restructuring
this a bit (i.e., if most of what I pass in to the constructor are n
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:25:31 -0300, Joachim Van der Auwera
wrote:
I am assuming this is related to the page having a lot of persistent
fields (over 100).
100 persistent fields? Are you sure this is a good idea?
I am sure that it is not a good idea. This
The limit hasn't change, and is enforced by Javassist and/or the JVM.
However, 5.2 may be adding more constructor arguments than 5.1 to
accomplish the same thing. I may need to think about restructuring
this a bit (i.e., if most of what I pass in to the constructor are now
pretty uniform) ... for
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:25:31 -0300, Joachim Van der Auwera
wrote:
I am assuming this is related to the page having a lot of persistent
fields (over 100).
100 persistent fields? Are you sure this is a good idea?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hiber
On a specific page (which has generated content), I get a "Too many
arguments in method signature in class" exception when loading the page.
I am assuming this is related to the page having a lot of persistent
fields (over 100).
Is there a limit on the number of allowed persistent fields in a
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote:
>
>> t:contnt is what you want. It's not a component, it is it's own xml tag. So,
>> either:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> stuff you want in here
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Or:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Do you have multiple versions of javassist on your classpath? Take a
look at this thread:
http://old.nabble.com/-t5--upgrade-to-java-6-and-javassist-td25295834.html
If you're trying to run on Google App Engine, take a look here:
http://dmitrygusev.blogspot.com/2009/10/develope-java-applications-
It might be because you have 1.6 as your java compile target. We use target
1.5, we get similar errors as you list here when using 1.6.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:30 AM, N T R PHANI KUMAR wrote:
> I am facing *Invalid length ... in LocalVariableTable* error for some of
> the tapestry page java fil
Hi
Use empty parameter to customize the display when the list is empty
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.1/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/Grid.html
Regards,
Christophe Cordenier.
2010/3/10 Jagadesh Paladugula
> Hi Everyone,
>
> In Tapestry, Grid gets generated wh
Hi Everyone,
In Tapestry, Grid gets generated when the "source" attribute of the grid
returns a collection with length>0. When the length of the collection is 0,
by default it generates some text content saying "*There is no data to
display*".
I want to change the above functionality in such a wa
26 matches
Mail list logo
