How many on the list would think that breaking with apache and trying a
radical change (be more like a company, like SpringSource) is something that
should be tried? After all being an Apache project does allow Donations or
Funding directly to a respective project? like Tapestry?
and i do believe t
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:10:30 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship
wrote:
Quality issues are hard to gauge.
I agree. I was thinking about the same quality measures used in Tapestry
itself: test coverage.
Also, there's something good about having a suite of libraries that
are released on the same sc
Hi,
I found this solution to the security elegant: simply putting a
@RequiresLogin in the page to be protected and let the
ComponentRequestFilter checks the annotation in the page. now if I need
something else, say @ReqiresOwner, say I'd allow the owner of inbox to go to
a Inbox page, I can pass
> > For a beginner like me, it would be really nice if Tapestry had some
> > lightweight annotations for authorization of pages, component visibility
> > and events against some lightweight maybe only role based authentication
> > service.
>
> Agreed. I may put something simple together for that
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Alexander Kiel wrote:
>> > Well, because I want to redirect from other places in code, not from
>> > onActivate() method.
>>
>> I think this is a good course. I think you'll find your pages more
>> maintainable when you have this kind of organization in place. If y
> > Well, because I want to redirect from other places in code, not from
> > onActivate() method.
>
> I think this is a good course. I think you'll find your pages more
> maintainable when you have this kind of organization in place. If you
> have to get mid-way through processing or rendering the
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:47:07 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship
> wrote:
>
>> One of the challenges of running Tapestry as an Apache project is
>> that, due to licensing concerns, a lot of the integrations are
>> non-starters.
>> I kee
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:47:07 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship
wrote:
One of the challenges of running Tapestry as an Apache project is
that, due to licensing concerns, a lot of the integrations are
non-starters.
I keep expecting someone to say "Hey, You can't integrate with
Hibernate! It's LGPL!".
One of the challenges of running Tapestry as an Apache project is
that, due to licensing concerns, a lot of the integrations are
non-starters.
I keep expecting someone to say "Hey, You can't integrate with
Hibernate! It's LGPL!".
Some days I fantasize about just moving the code base up to GitHub
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Algirdas wrote:
>
> Well, because I want to redirect from other places in code, not from
> onActivate() method.
I think this is a good course. I think you'll find your pages more
maintainable when you have this kind of organization in place. If you
have to get mid
Well, because I want to redirect from other places in code, not from
onActivate() method.
But I see now it should be possible to redesign a bit to achieve required
redirect from onActivate().
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Redirect-not-from-onActivate-tp4627871p4629010.h
To be clear, @IncludeStylesheet is just some meta-programming; it
ultimately goes through RenderSupport just like the hand-tooled code.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> How about something simpler, like
>
> @IncludeStylesheet("context:static/css/form.css")
> public clas
How about something simpler, like
@IncludeStylesheet("context:static/css/form.css")
public class MyComponent { ... }
Let Tapestry do the heavy lifting.
What you are providing there is an asset path. The "context:" part
indicates that the file in question is in the web application context
("clas
Hi Algirdas,
why do you want to use response.sendRedirect()? You can simply return a
page class name. Tapestry always redirects.
Regards
Alex
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 13:06 -0800, Algirdas wrote:
> Thank you all for suggestions.
>
>
> It appears that I have to redesign some of page activation rou
Thank you all for suggestions.
It appears that I have to redesign some of page activation routines.
As for RedirectException, I'm afraid it will crash with the same
NullPointerException, because it uses same response redirect as I use now:
response.sendRedirect(pageLink.toRedirectURI());
al
Hi,
I get the following error:
ERROR - RequestExceptionHandler- Processing of request failed with
uncaught exception: (class:
org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/base/AbstractLink, method:
testifyGetrenderSupport signature:
()Lorg/apache/tapestry5/RenderSupport;) Inconsistent args_size for
opc_invok
Hi,
I have seen a how-to on tapestry's wiki that describes how to implement a
RedirectException which, when thrown from any part of your code, will perform a
redirect (similar to the RedirectException that used to exist in Tapestry 4):
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5RedirectException
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:11:18 -0300, Algirdas wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
Is there any way to do a redirect from any method?
Not out-of-the-box.
For example I have EnsureUserLoggedIn() which should redirect to Login
page, but this is called not in onActivate() method.
onActivate() (or any metho
Hi Algirdas,
you can use the @OnEvent annotation with a value of "activate". For the
redirect, you should simply return the class of the page.
Regards
Alex
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:11 -0800, Algirdas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any way to do a redirect from any method?
>
> For example I have
Hello,
Is there any way to do a redirect from any method?
For example I have EnsureUserLoggedIn() which should redirect to Login page,
but this is called not in onActivate() method.
I used response.sendRedirect(link), but since upgrage to 5.1.0.5 it throws
NPE
org.apache.tapestry5.internal.s
My point of view:
- Donations or funding: why not? It is something that need a deeply
analysis? why not just do it and see what happens?
- And like SpringSource i think that child projects like Testify,
Tapestry-Cayenne should be (if possible) on the Tapestry site and deeply
integrated with it (b
As far as I can see there is no simple solution using addRowLink. If you
have found a solution to this by now, I am interested in how you solved it.
If I can find a solution I will post it here.
Dariusz skrev:
Is it possible?
Maybe there is a workaround for this.
moonlee wrote:
I use Aj
We solve this a different way by just starting jetty with a main class.
See http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5RunViaMain for an example. This
has the advantage of working the same in any IDE.
Ben Gidley
www.gidley.co.uk
b...@gidley.co.uk
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Raul Raja Marti
My native language is spanish (Argentina), my second, english. So I can't
read Igor Drobiazko's book, but I'd love to. No chances on english version?
In that case, I could help for a spanish version. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe I can contribute s
Hello Thiago!
Your proposal was (again) the good solution, so thanks a lot :o)
Here follows the code :
@SetupRender
void setup(){
Asset asset = assetSource.getContextAsset("static/css/form.css",
null);
renderSupport.addStylesheetLink(asset,null);
...
}
Which
Hi,
maybe I can contribute something to this discussion, as I started using
Tapestry just one week ago.
As you said already, the documentation (aside from the one on
tapestry.apache.org itself) is somehow wildly scattered around. The wiki
is, like most wikis, not well structured. There is plenty
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:18:18 -0300, Thomas Cucchietti
wrote:
Alexander,
this was the first thing I tried to do :
@SetupRender
void setup(){
renderSupport.addStylesheetLink("context:static/css/form.css",
null);
}
@Inject AssertSource and use one of its methods
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:12:57 -0300, Piero Sartini
wrote:
Yep - now the question is how to nicely integrate them into
http://tapestry.apache.org
Agreed. :)
From a user's perspective, SSO would be great as well (wiki, forum,
comments)
Single Sign On? As far as I know, Apache's sites (bes
Alexander,
this was the first thing I tried to do :
@SetupRender
void setup(){
renderSupport.addStylesheetLink("context:static/css/form.css",
null);
}
But the HTML result is :
And my styles aren't used.
Thomas.
2010/2/24 Alexander Kiel
> Hi Thomas,
>
> please
> There is one in Nabble (new version at
> http://n2.nabble.com/Tapestry-Users-f832.html, old one at
> http://old.nabble.com/Tapestry-f302.html), OSDir, MarkMail, etc.
Yep - now the question is how to nicely integrate them into
http://tapestry.apache.org
>From a user's perspective, SSO would be gr
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:56:39 -0300, Piero Sartini
wrote:
You are propably right - but it does not 'feel' / look that healthy.
Maybe the problem again is visibility.
We have the mailing lists - point taken. But they are very well hidded
behind a subscription. What would be great is a nice look
About the Confluence part:
I'm playing with a Confluence wiki right now and I'm evaluating how to import existing content. Once
that's done we can have the website completely in Confluence and published from there. This will
require a new process though because right now the documentation is ti
> I think Tapestry has a very healthy community around it. I guess you're
> talking about the size of it. The mailing list has many messages per day,
> people contribute packages, etc.
You are propably right - but it does not 'feel' / look that healthy.
Maybe the problem again is visibility.
We ha
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:26:24 -0300, Piero Sartini
wrote:
We are getting there - with contributions from the community. But we
need to make them more visible and communicate that it is totally OK
to use them, even if it is not part of the tapestry core. Maybe we
even need to think about making
> I've just spent whole January, four hours a week, teaching Tapestry in a
> large company with lots of people working in large projects, including one
> that will be used nationwide in Brazil. The standard argument doesn't
> convince me: JSF is a mess and it is a standard. It suffers from the
> ev
Hi Thomas,
please try to use:
renderSupport.addStylesheetLink("context:static/css/common.css", null);
The "context:" prefix should point to your document root of your webapp.
Regards
Alex
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:52 +0100, Thomas Cucchietti wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> As it is linked to a p
Hello everybody,
As it is linked to a pretty recent behavior (since T 5.1 apparently), I've
not found information about the following problem :
The new locale management system (no more cookie, but locale added in the
root URL) has a side effect on my application.
I'm used to include my styleshe
Hi,
this definitely sounds something T5 should do as it is known to be developer
friendly and aid in debugging whenever possible.
It sounds good to enable this in non-production mode and disable in
production.
- Ville
Ben Dotte-2 wrote:
>
> I put up a post on pretty printing the JSON that
thanks! its online again!
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Tapesty-Testify-Tapestry360-missing-dependency-tp4613235p4624435.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubsc
Now the folder is online again!
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/T5-Missing-dependency-tapestry360-project-tp4604461p4624413.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubs
40 matches
Mail list logo
