Oops! Of course December 7th, not November.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Christian Riedel
wrote:
> don't miss your own talk, igor. it's december 7th ;)
>
> http://87.230.78.21:8080/display/jugc/2009.12.07+XMLVM%2C+Tapestry
>
>
> Igor Drobiazko schrieb:
>
> Hello Tapestry folks around Cologne
don't miss your own talk, igor. it's december 7th ;)
http://87.230.78.21:8080/display/jugc/2009.12.07+XMLVM%2C+Tapestry
Igor Drobiazko schrieb:
Hello Tapestry folks around Cologne, Germany. November 7th I'll give a
Tapestry talk at Java User Group Cologne [1].
It would be nice to meet some fol
Thanks you for the response Sir Howard
Currently the other way to do it is to use Request Parameters.
But i dont like the refresh thing maybe for now this will do the trick
then in the future i will reveal the mystery of Block with javascript.
Thanks a lot, i will visit the link you gave...
Hi thiago, yes that would be a lot easier, thanks.
I think i can serialize the array to JSON and deserialized it on the
onSuccess method
Thanks
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> I guess the easier way would be a hidden TextField that will receive the
> valu
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Jim O'Callaghan wrote:
> That worked thanks Howard. I had previously unsuccessfully tried moving the
> implementation classes out of the base package, but hadn't moved the
> interfaces.
>
> P.S. I'm starting a medium size application from scratch using Tapestry 5
Hello Tapestry folks around Cologne, Germany. November 7th I'll give a
Tapestry talk at Java User Group Cologne [1].
It would be nice to meet some folks from this mailing list.The talk is in
German.
[1] http://jugcologne.org/
--
Best regards,
Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de/blog
That worked thanks Howard. I had previously unsuccessfully tried moving the
implementation classes out of the base package, but hadn't moved the
interfaces.
P.S. I'm starting a medium size application from scratch using Tapestry 5,
having evaluated quite a few other frameworks and must say I am v
base is a special package, it should only contain base classes for
Tapestry components, pages and mixins. Move IPersistentObjectRef to
some other package.
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.1/guide/component-classes.html
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Jim O'Callaghan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm
Hello,
I'm having a linkage issue that is proving time consuming to track down and
am hoping some of the bright sparks here may be able to give me some
pointers - this may turn out to be something blindingly obvious, or to be
not relevant to Tapestry but some java issue I haven't spotted - I would
These are kind of static assets. They rarely change...
and how do you get the context name ?
Le 30/11/2009 12:55, Ulrich Stärk a écrit :
Don't use assets in this case. Assets are for static content that
rarely changes. Hence the version number and far future expire headers.
Uli
Am 30.11.200
Don't use assets in this case. Assets are for static content that rarely changes. Hence the version
number and far future expire headers.
Uli
Am 30.11.2009 11:57 schrieb TNO:
Hi,
I migrate from T5.0.18 to T5.0.1.5 a couple of days ago. Ok works fine !
But I work on an application which users
Hi Pierre,
Basically you need to use: org.apache.tapestry5.services.Response; which
shadows the methods of HttpServletResponse.
response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_FORBIDDEN,
"You do not have permission to access this resource");
return true; // this is also important
Hi,
I migrate from T5.0.18 to T5.0.1.5 a couple of days ago. Ok works fine !
But I work on an application which users can upload document and image.
So my link to these assets must not contains the application version in
their path. They can be dependant of my application version which change
Before I forget, thanks a lot for your help on this issue! It caused me
to dive into the Tapestry source a bit deeper and makes me appreciate
the framework even more!
A few more weeks and I will bring a new Tapestry application to the
world ;-)
Ulrich Stärk wrote:
That explains why I wasn't
That explains why I wasn't able to reproduce it. Great investigative work :)
Uli
Am 30.11.2009 08:55 schrieb Joost Schouten (ml):
Eureka! ;-) I figured it out (I think). The problem only exists when
using any UrlRewriteRule, activation context and additional parameters.
The t:ac seems to be ad
15 matches
Mail list logo
