Re: How to implement paginated search results

2009-07-18 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Em Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:23:52 -0300, Pete Poulos escreveu: Thanks for the reply Thiago, You're welcome! How would you set it up? If I have variable number of search criteria (the user can leave some criteria empty, also some searches I've seen let users add new criteria rows), wouldn't I

Re: How to implement paginated search results

2009-07-18 Thread Pete Poulos
Thanks for the reply Thiago, I have a question about this item: >> Page Context >> Store the search criteria in the page context (by encoding it into a >> string representation?). It seems like a large number of sites store >> their search criteria into the pages URL in one manner or another, >>

Re: How to implement paginated search results

2009-07-18 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Em Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:40:10 -0300, Pete Poulos escreveu: Hi, Hi! Session Store the search criteria in the users session. From what I can tell this won't work because when the user starts a new search in a new tab the new search criteria will replace the search criteria used by the tabs

Re: Is AjaxFormLoop example working for you?

2009-07-18 Thread Robert Zeigler
Managed to duplicate without screwing with cookies. Load the page. Wait for awhile (say, 5-10 minutes). Now click "add row". Which is already described here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-733 On Jul 18, 2009, at 7/188:52 AM , Robert Zeigler wrote: That's an interesting theory, but

How to implement paginated search results

2009-07-18 Thread Pete Poulos
Hi, I have a search page where users enter in a set of search criteria and are then redirected to a search results page. I don't want to display all of results in one page, so I am working on implementing a paginated navigation bar along the top of the page which looks something like the followin

Re: Is AjaxFormLoop example working for you?

2009-07-18 Thread Otho
oops forgot ff3.0 on latest ubuntu. 2009/7/18 Otho > Both work. When I turn cookies off with both open in tabs 1st fails > silently (does nothing) 2nd throws up an error. after reloading both pages > with cookies still off both work again. > >

Re: Is AjaxFormLoop example working for you?

2009-07-18 Thread Otho
Both work. When I turn cookies off with both open in tabs 1st fails silently (does nothing) 2nd throws up an error. after reloading both pages with cookies still off both work again.

Re: Is AjaxFormLoop example working for you?

2009-07-18 Thread Sven Homburg
Robert, i am sure enough for you too ;-) with regards Sven Homburg Founder of the Chenille Kit Project http://www.chenillekit.org 2009/7/18 Robert Zeigler : > That's an interesting theory, but I'm not convinced, personally. > I've explicitly set FF3.5 to block cookies from jumpstart and clea

Re: Is AjaxFormLoop example working for you?

2009-07-18 Thread Robert Zeigler
That's an interesting theory, but I'm not convinced, personally. I've explicitly set FF3.5 to block cookies from jumpstart and cleared my cookies from jumpstart. And it still works for me (OS: Leopard). So I'm not so sure it's a cookie issue. Robert On Jul 18, 2009, at 7/186:02 AM , Sergey

Re: Is AjaxFormLoop example working for you?

2009-07-18 Thread Sergey Didenko
It works in IE8, Firefox 3.5, Opera 9.64. Windows XP, no proxy, Ukraine If I open the page, then delete session cookies, "add row" fails. May be some firewalls, antiviruses just cut session id cookie and that is the reason. - To

Re: Is AjaxFormLoop example working for you?

2009-07-18 Thread Sven Homburg
I try it some more time! if i point my browser to your links, do some normal action, all is fine. BUT! if i delete all my session cookies and do the same actions again, i get an exception. i think, because i had the same problem whith some chnillekit components, that the JSESSION parameter is add

Re: Is AjaxFormLoop example working for you?

2009-07-18 Thread Geoff Callender
To everyone who hasn't tried the experiment yet, can you give it a try now? That would be fabulous. It takes one minute, and it's described in the e-mail below. To those have replied already, many thanks. Does anyone have a theory of the cause yet? I don't, because I still can't see a pa