Re: best book for T5

2009-06-14 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Well, this community can help to make the publisher's decision easier. If somebody of you is interested in a book translation, just comment here. I will forward this thread to the publisher. The more interests available the more likely they will do it. So give the publisher the impression how big i

Re: Switch from Prototype to jQuery?

2009-06-14 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Em Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:57:03 -0300, Onno Scheffers escreveu: Are you saying that the component libraries themselves should be able to switch between the supported JavaScript frameworks as well?If that's the case, there is quite a bit of wrapping-code Tapestry needs to introduce/support.

Re: Switch from Prototype to jQuery?

2009-06-14 Thread Onno Scheffers
> > At the very least then we need a way to describe the "stack" used by a > component and guard against incompatibilities, i.e. Protoype needed by > component A and jquery by component B resulting in a conflict on the $() > function. For jQuery it shouldn't really be a problem. The $()-function

Re: Difference between prop: and ${...} in PageLink

2009-06-14 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Onno Scheffers wrote: > ${} is a shortcut to make it very easy to insert some property-value into > your template without having to use a component for it. There are typically > 3 ways to insert some content into your page: > > 1. The way you're using components,

Re: Hooks for code on every page request

2009-06-14 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Em Sun, 14 Jun 2009 02:12:34 -0300, Angelo Chen escreveu: maybe dispatcher? you can find a related articles in the wiki page for t5. Or a request filter. A dispatcher is more suited for logic that needs page redirection. For example, I implemented an access logging package implemented

Re: Switch from Prototype to jQuery?

2009-06-14 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
At the very least then we need a way to describe the "stack" used by a component and guard against incompatibilities, i.e. Protoype needed by component A and jquery by component B resulting in a conflict on the $() function. On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Markus Joschko wrote: > I agree with On

Re: Switch from Prototype to jQuery?

2009-06-14 Thread Markus Joschko
I agree with Onno. There is a difference between component libraries and the framework itself. I want to use the framework without being forced to include some specific javascript library. That includes basic components like form fields etc. I wouldn't mind if more complex components still dictate

Re: Switch from Prototype to jQuery?

2009-06-14 Thread Onno Scheffers
> > In release X (say 5.2) we introduce a more complete Tapestry isolation > layer > and recode Tapestry's internal logic and components to use it. The > isolation layer maps to Prototype and includes parallels to the common > constructs of Prototype used by Tapestry (i.e., $(), observe(), and som