T5: tapestry-spring-security still processes form submissions after logout

2008-09-10 Thread buckofive
Hi all, I am using tapestry-spring-security version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT (awesome plugin btw) and everything seems to work perfectly except when the combined steps are executed below: - go to a secured page with a form on it. i.e. @Secured("ROLE_ADMIN") public class ... - logout using the LogoutServic

Re: T5: tapestry-ioc scope problem in a standalone program

2008-09-10 Thread hua.jiang
kristian.marinkovic wrote: > > add following instruction after you have started the thread: > Thread.currentThread().join() > > changes are good that you main program (process) is terminated > before the thread is started. > > g, > kris > Thank you for your reply. But it seems not a corre

Re: A glimpse of Wicket 1.4 and Tapestry 5

2008-09-10 Thread Alex Kotchnev
It's a good comparison. I'll probe at the job to see if I can publish some of the internal analysis that led to the selection of Wicket over Seam & Tapestry as the web framework for future development (initially internally, later external). Some of the conclusions there were quite practical, and c

A glimpse of Wicket 1.4 and Tapestry 5

2008-09-10 Thread Mohammad Shamsi
Hi, take a look at this article if you interested. http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/a-glimpse-of-wicket-14-and-tapestry-5/ -- sincerely yours M. H. Shamsi

Re: Tapestry5.0.7 versus 5.0.14

2008-09-10 Thread Sven Homburg
there is an updated (mavenized) package for using with tapestry5.0.15-SNAPSHOT at http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Training 2008/9/10 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I really can't believe that the code has changed so much that the tutorial > on: > > http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Trainin

Re: Tapestry5.0.7 versus 5.0.14

2008-09-10 Thread Ulrich Stärk
Well, those wiki articles are only accurate as long as someone keeps them up to date with all the framework changes. In this case this wiki article was written against 5.0.7 and there have been lots of changes since then which is normal for a framework still in development. I warmly recommend y

Re: T-4.1.6-SNAPSHOT broken? commons-pool

2008-09-10 Thread Martin Strand
I'm not sure why Maven would favor 1.3 over 1.4... You could either explicitly add commons-pool 1.4 to your pom, or exclude 1.3 from your commons-dbcp dependency so that it will be ignored. Off the top of my head, something like this: ... commons-dbcp ... ...

RE: T-4.1.6-SNAPSHOT broken? commons-pool

2008-09-10 Thread Ken in nashua
Well Still no solution except for brute force specifying commons-pool-1.4 in my webapp pom. commons-dbcp-1.2.2 has nothing to do with it but shows up as a parent in the tree for it. Still do not know whats pulling commons-pool-1.3 in. Here is the tree... C:\Prototype\Mavenized\Product\tr

Tapestry5.0.7 versus 5.0.14

2008-09-10 Thread superoverdrive
I really can't believe that the code has changed so much that the tutorial on: http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Training does not work with the latest Tapestry5. Why were the package names changes to tapestry5 ? Has anyone a working version of this tutorial? Original-Nachricht

RE: Updating maven from within eclipse

2008-09-10 Thread Jonathan Barker
Following up on my previous post, there was a thread back around 5/21 where HLS gave the following tip for updating the package names: > find . -name \*.java -o -name \*.xml -o -name \*.properties | > xargs sed -i s/org\\.apache\\.tapestry\\./org.apache.tapestry5./g > -Original Me

RE: Updating maven from within eclipse

2008-09-10 Thread Jonathan Barker
Wow. Lots of changes since 5.0.6. For starters, at 5.0.12, the root package for Tapestry code changed to org.apache.tapestry5. Take a look at: http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/upgrade.html I mix m2eclipse and command-line maven. I find m2eclipse handy for on-the-fly additions, but I fall

Re: @onevent anotation

2008-09-10 Thread Kristian Marinkovic
any event that the referenced component can fire :) ActionLink -> onEvent(value="action",component="actionlink") Form -> onEvent(value="prepare",component="form") ... the possible events should be documented by the component reference (see ActionLink or Form component reference for example) g,

@onevent anotation

2008-09-10 Thread Natia Gdzelishvili
Hello, I want to know what values can be assigned to @OnEvent(value=???, component="somecomponent") i kwon only "selected" and "submit"

T5: OnActivate is called on Acegi @Secured page

2008-09-10 Thread Konstantin
I have a page with: @Secured(User.ROLE_USER) public class Page1 extends MyAbstractPage { void onActivate(long someId) { Some initialization takes place here. No check against user role, cause we believe we're secured! } } If I call this without context like this: http://localhost:8080/my