It actually saved the content of the assets in a specified directory, so
they'd be served by Apache rather than tomcat
L.
Jesse Kuhnert a écrit :
I've never really used T3 (other than the progression of alpha/beta
builds
from T3->T4 when I first found it ) - what exactly did externalizing an
Hi
That's very nice that you've posted your web.xml here, it seems
somehow strange for me because I woudln't expect filter without any
servlets inside.
I've checked tapestry quickstart and it seems that the same configuration there.
I guess here is minor differences in the servlet container
imple
Sure, the old data persists until it is changed.
When you want a new user, you need to create it somewhere, eg:
>public void userNewAction(IRequestCycle cycle) {
>
> UserEdit nextPage = (UserEdit) cycle.getPage("UserEdit");
> nextPage.setUserId(0);
-->
'cause Howard told me not to use internal classes :) I simply extended the
Link interface myself. Pretty much like the ACEGI trick.
Bill
On 7/25/07, Daniel Jue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you share your implementation? Is there a reason you couldn't
return a link as used on the wiki's Ac
After making the EfiUser persist in the UserEdit.page the edit works fine
but after editing one user if I want to add a new user then the page get
populated the previous user. I’m setting user to the EditUser page only in
edit action. But in new action I’m not setting any user but still it is
get
Yea!
"..because they are evil bastards"
+1
On 7/26/07, Marcus Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- at least, that's a pretty decent reason, isn't it?
2007/7/26, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> IE won't let you do it. ..because they are evil bastards.
>
> On 7/25/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[
- at least, that's a pretty decent reason, isn't it?
2007/7/26, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
IE won't let you do it. ..because they are evil bastards.
On 7/25/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anybody know if there are some problems in updating a tbody element
> wh
Look at the "How client ids are generated" section here:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/ajax/basics.html
It's all covered in excruciating detail. The gist of it is that you do
this:
public void renderSomething(){
super.renderIdAttribute(writer, cycle);
}
and everything else gets ha
I think Andreas has some kind of multi-form-factory-generator-thinger but I
have no idea how it should be used. I still think it seems like a core bug
that should just be fixed and dealt with by default but I haven't looked at
it in a while.
maybe Andy has some thoughts?
Besides that, if you w
It hasn't.
On 7/25/07, Networm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to know in which version of Tapestry this bug has been fixed
.Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Upload-file-component%28async-problem%29-tf3361721.html#a11781685
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing
IE won't let you do it. ..because they are evil bastards.
On 7/25/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anybody know if there are some problems in updating a tbody element
when performing an ajax request?
Thx,
kiuma
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
Open
You can just call :
public void pageBeginRender(PageEvent event) {
event.getRequestCycle().isRewinding();
}
If you need to know if something "has rewound" after the fact I think the
only logical next question is "why" ? It indicates that you are probably
attacking whatever problem you are hand
Even with client side debugging turned on you don't see any problems? (ie
debugEnabled=true for Shell or equivalent)
If you are targeting elements="someId" I guess things could get a little
squirrelly as I don't personally do that very often.
There should be ~something~ that comes out of the cli
If you feel like living on the edge (not really, but it's a snapshot build)
- the InlineEditBox supports listener/parameter stuff and allows you to do
this sort of thing you are doing. (I think? )
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/components/dojo/inlineeditbox.html
On 7/23/07, Ying Lee <[EM
If you want to look at 4.1.2 source use the tag - if you want to look at
whatever the current development version is use trunk. (currently 4.1.3 but
that will probably change more frequently now)
On 7/22/07, #Cyrille37# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
If I want to have a look at T4.1.2 source
I've never really used T3 (other than the progression of alpha/beta builds
from T3->T4 when I first found it ) - what exactly did externalizing an
asset mean?
On 7/21/07, Lionel Touati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi List,
In Tapestry 3, there was the ability to externalize assets on the web
ser
This is exactly why the framework should provide something,
so I guess I'll add the JIRA issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1671
Any code additions would be helpful.
If you use anything with "internal" in the package name, expect
it to break one day. It's not part of Tapestry'
Alexa22 a écrit :
Hi,
I have a problem, I'm developing a Tapestry's aplication and I need to
active the security in there, but the page is autenticated by WAS (WebShere
Application Server) and LDAP, When the user is already authenticate,
Is Tapestry running on the WAS ?
If yes, have a look at
Hi,
I have a problem, I'm developing a Tapestry's aplication and I need to
active the security in there, but the page is autenticated by WAS (WebShere
Application Server) and LDAP, When the user is already authenticate, I
don't Know how to pass to the other page, My html is this:
Do you have a
No unordinary log messages (I switched on debug logging ... oo boy...
but nothing stood out) and no exceptions. I put ${filesystemroot} in
my template and it renders blank.
On 7/25/07, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Off the top of my head, that should work. What behavior are you
Off the top of my head, that should work. What behavior are you seeing? Any
log messages or exceptions?
On 7/25/07, Peter Beshai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my application, people can upload files. What is the best way to
configure the root of the location the files go to?
I thought I'd con
In my application, people can upload files. What is the best way to
configure the root of the location the files go to?
I thought I'd contribute to ApplicationDefaults like so:
public static void contributeApplicationDefaults(
MappedConfiguration configuration)
{
configurati
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 09:09 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1667
>
> And, yes, it's a bug. Expansions were treated as invariant when they are,
> in fact, variant.
Wow, very fast in fixing this!
Respect :)
cheers,
Martin
>
> On 7/25/07, Howard L
Hi Howard,
thanx a lot for this explanation, again I learned s.th. about T5 :)
Indeed, prop:currentPage works, unfortunately my eyes were blind
these days to tell me that there's the ${expansions} stuff - or my
brain didn't tell my eyes that this is s.th. special ;)
Thanx a lot,
cheers,
Martin
Hello,
This days I'm trying to find a way for managing validation between
severals checkbox.
The need is: there are several checkboxes in a form and each checkbox
needs to match rules which exprims dependencies between those checkboxes.
For example : you can check this one if you have checked t
this is easy, but when you have a dozen fields to set, this becomes a little
verbose...
isn't a way to set it via .properties file?
Em 25/07/07, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> Olá Marcelo,
>
>
> submitLabel="Gravar">
>
>
>
>
Olá Marcelo,
(Informe o nome)
Marcus
Hi all,
anyone knows how set the size of a text field in BeanEditForm,
preferentially using the .properties file?
--
Atenciosamente,
Marcelo Lotif
It's a very, very good idea!
On 7/25/07, Ognen Ivanovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I often look at:
...
and think if there could be a better (and yet generic) way to express
this.
The only thing that comes to my mind is to use another namespace
(with prefix p
I often look at:
...
and think if there could be a better (and yet generic) way to express
this.
The only thing that comes to my mind is to use another namespace
(with prefix p) and then do something like:
...
Of course this can easil
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1667
And, yes, it's a bug. Expansions were treated as invariant when they are,
in fact, variant.
On 7/25/07, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You've bound the parameter _currentPage to the value obtained from
${currentPage}.
Expansio
You've bound the parameter _currentPage to the value obtained from
${currentPage}.
Expansions are always read-only. prop:currentPage is read/write, but
${currentPage} is read-only.
The instance variable in the component is always reading or updating the
binding. So if you update _currentPage i
That seems to be exactly the issue. Thanks a lot!
On 7/25/07, Steven Coco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If filtering is enabled in Maven, then it will filter binary files too: and it
is the case with Maven that your images are nearly guaranteed to be
corrupted.
The ideal way to solve it is to sepa
If filtering is enabled in Maven, then it will filter binary files too: and it
is the case with Maven that your images are nearly guaranteed to be
corrupted.
The ideal way to solve it is to separate files that need filtering from those
that don't, by defining several resource directories:
http
Hi,
I have a problem, I'm developing a Tapestry's aplication and I need to
active the security in there, but the page is autenticated by WAS (WebShere
Application Server) and LDAP, My html is this: but I don't know later of
authenticated the user to take it to the main page!!..
Do you have any i
Can you share your implementation? Is there a reason you couldn't
return a link as used on the wiki's Acegi tutorial?
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5LinkingToNonTapestryURIs
On 7/24/07, Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Got it going with my own implementation of Link.
bill
Well, I'm not sure that's warranted.
bill
On 7/24/07, Nick Westgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't forget to log a JIRA issue. ;-)
Cheers,
Nick.
Bill Holloway wrote:
> Got it going with my own implementation of Link.
>
> bill
>
> On 7/23/07, Nick Westgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
Igor Drobiazko a écrit :
Well, your component looks somehow strange to me. I don't see what it
should
do.
However id="checkbox" is written when your contained checkbox is
rendered.
That's expected behavior. Your own component does nothing except
registering
to the group. So why do you expect
hi,
i have 2 forms, both should be submitted via ajax.
1. one is in my home.html and should be submitted using a submit-component:
2. one is in a subcomponent and should also be submitted via submit-component:
this renders to two submits, both with id 'Submit':
...
Hi Naz,
Is it possible for you to put some tips to use tomcat with your
JumpStart?
Sorry but I don't have any plans for doing a Tomcat-only
implementation, so the short answer is "no". The reason is that
JumpStart uses EJB3 for the business layer. That pretty much means
an application
I want to know in which version of Tapestry this bug has been fixed .Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Upload-file-component%28async-problem%29-tf3361721.html#a11781685
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Well, your component looks somehow strange to me. I don't see what it should
do.
However id="checkbox" is written when your contained checkbox is rendered.
That's expected behavior. Your own component does nothing except registering
to the group. So why do you expect id="ckL1"?
On 7/25/07, #Cyril
Igor Drobiazko a écrit :
It is inpossible to help you without having a look into your
GroupableCheckbox.java and GroupableCheckbox.html
Please post it.
Ha! That's another story, a more complex problem ;-)
After relearned Ids concept, I can talk to you about the component
GroupableCheckbox which
It is inpossible to help you without having a look into your
GroupableCheckbox.java and GroupableCheckbox.html
Please post it.
On 7/25/07, #Cyrille37# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor Drobiazko a écrit :
> Cyrille,
>
> please provide your sources. Otherwise we have to use our glass sphere
:)
But
Igor Drobiazko a écrit :
Cyrille,
please provide your sources. Otherwise we have to use our glass sphere :)
But I do not need to debug my source, I just need more memory ;-) I do
not remember some tapestry syntax.
I think I'm handsaking component's ids in my brain.
Is that syntax definition r
Cyrille,
please provide your sources. Otherwise we have to use our glass sphere :)
On 7/25/07, #Cyrille37# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrea Chiumenti a écrit :
> ciao,
> the fact is that tapestry uses the form form['componentname'] , so
> for
> Tapestry name is sufficient to specify ur id
Well this question should be addressed to Jesse
On 7/25/07, #Cyrille37# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrea Chiumenti a écrit :
> ciao,
> the fact is that tapestry uses the form form['componentname'] , so
> for
> Tapestry name is sufficient to specify ur id u should use
> id="clientId:yourCom
Andrea Chiumenti a écrit :
ciao,
the fact is that tapestry uses the form form['componentname'] , so
for
Tapestry name is sufficient to specify ur id u should use
id="clientId:yourComponentId".
But why the shortest way jwcid="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" does not create
a html element with a id="myCo
ciao,
the fact is that tapestry uses the form form['componentname'] , so for
Tapestry name is sufficient to specify ur id u should use
id="clientId:yourComponentId".
Hope this helps.
kiuma
On 7/25/07, #Cyrille37# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
I'm writing my first "complex" component :
Hello
I'm writing my first "complex" component : GroupableCheckbox (not same
behaviors as CheckboxGroup).
The question is about the component id. To define the id of the
component I think to use the text before the @ in the jwcid but it does
work, I had to add an id attribute :
does not wri
50 matches
Mail list logo
