I read the doc for the 'For' element and I find it pretty clear what
volatile means. I was used to the T3 'Foreach' element which relied on
the rewind cycle to rebuild the list...
Thanks for all the help.
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Maybe this deserves its own quick specific section in the t4/t5 doc
Maybe this deserves its own quick specific section in the t4/t5 docs.
I seem to remember wondering "wtf does 'volatile' mean anyway?" a
couple times a long time ago. Maybe it'll help shed more light on the
importance of using efficient squeezers/key converters/etc...
On 2/25/07, Howard Lewis Ship
My current theory is that there's more than one bug here.
One was the ClassLoader threading issue which is still hard to track down.
There seems to be another issue inside tapestry-ioc related to
instantiating of service implementations. There's code that should be
impossible to trigger that's
That's what the Loop's volatile parameter is for, that is, for turning
off that "record state into the form" behavior.
On 2/24/07, Jean-Philippe Bouchard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Howard,
I don't need to squeeze it. I just happen to iterate a list ContextAsset
in a "For" component rendered
Documented here:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-core/guide/conf.html
On 2/13/07, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I couldn't find in the docs how Tapestry finds the module builder(s) for
the running application. I can see that for packaged modules it gets the
info from META-
Yep, I think there will be a t:content element soon, but not yet. And
remember the difference between well formed (tags balanced, attributes
quoted, etc.) and valid (conforms to a DTD or schema). Templates
needs to be well formed only, they are not validated.
On 2/24/07, Peter Beshai <[EMAIL PR
?? Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:00:44 +0800??Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??
??:
Thanks.
I was i bit confused about how you could load more than one module in
the application. I've just found the subModule concept and everything
makes sense now.
@Id("module_id")
Thanks again
Massimo Luse
Works! Thanks Jesse.
Ciao
JPB
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Try adding volatile="true" to your For .
On 2/24/07, Jean-Philippe Bouchard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The squeeze happens in
org.apache.tapestry.components.ForBean#getStringRepFromValue() which is
called from
org.apache.tapestry.components.F
It's still not working.
Tests run: 762, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] There are test failures.
[INFO]
Try adding volatile="true" to your For .
On 2/24/07, Jean-Philippe Bouchard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The squeeze happens in
org.apache.tapestry.components.ForBean#getStringRepFromValue() which is
called from
org.apache.tapestry.components.ForBean.StoreSourceDataIterator#next()
which is called
The squeeze happens in
org.apache.tapestry.components.ForBean#getStringRepFromValue() which is
called from
org.apache.tapestry.components.ForBean.StoreSourceDataIterator#next()
which is called from the ForBean renderComponent() method.
Ciao
JPB
Jean-Philippe Bouchard wrote:
Hi Howard,
I do
Hi Howard,
I don't need to squeeze it. I just happen to iterate a list ContextAsset
in a "For" component rendered in a form. Tapestry tries to squeeze it by
adding it to a form hidden component. When the component is not used in
a form, it works perfectly.
This is the HTML page for the compo
Err.. it seems to work fine if I remove the and tags. How
about that. :-)
On 2/24/07, Peter Beshai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have created a component and when I add it into a page, I want only a
specific part of the template to be added, not the whole thing (since it
must be a well-formed
I have created a component and when I add it into a page, I want only a
specific part of the template to be added, not the whole thing (since it
must be a well-formed document..it seems I have to include and
what not in the component class). Basically I am looking for the equivalent
behaviour of
That's right. I had read somewhere create was default but that's false. It's
mostly a Spring/Hibernate issue.. solved with some remarks, read more at
http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=35274.
Kalle
On 2/24/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just omit the setting. If h
This is not a bug per-se, it could be an enhancement. There's nothing
in the description of ContextAsset to indicate that it is supposed to
be serializable and, generally, only serializable objects can be
"squeezed" into a URL.
It's possible to extend the DataSqueezer, via HiveMind contributions
I think that's my fault. Should be resolved on the next deploy
(today), but the next deploy might break you in other ways as
well...(new ognl )
On 2/23/07, Josh Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello list,
A long shot...
I've run into an issue and I could use some help.
I have a hibernate/spri
Just omit the setting. If hibernate doesn't see
hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto, it does nothing.
On 2/24/07, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In practice, no. I would have to mark a whole bunch of beans as lazy inited,
give up on auto wiring etc. But it does help to post your thoughts. I was
In practice, no. I would have to mark a whole bunch of beans as lazy inited,
give up on auto wiring etc. But it does help to post your thoughts. I was
close before.. I don't see hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto=false documented anywhere
(I see one(!) dodgy google result for it), but that works, and then I c
Can you just mark your session factory bean as lazy init in your
spring application context file? Or, mark the whole xml file as lazy
by default?
On 2/24/07, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using Tapestry 4.0.2 and this is much more a hivemind question really, but I
wonder if anybody
20 matches
Mail list logo
