Well, ok, i expressed myself rather poorly.
I did not mean that it is not possible to do cross-field validation with
validators, but rather that it is not the more "traditional" approach.
I do not like it very much, because it blurs the separation (and
location) of the two kinds of validation ru
fdegrassi wrote:
> AFAIK, validators do just that, validate the syntax of values
> submitted. (field level validation)
> Validation logic that involves multiple fields (form level validation)
> should go into the form/submit listener.
Not quite true...
Take a look at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/
AFAIK, validators do just that, validate the syntax of values submitted.
(field level validation)
Validation logic that involves multiple fields (form level validation)
should go into the form/submit listener.
Regards
Francesco Degrassi
Malin Ljungh wrote:
Good evening!
I have written my o
I agree with Sam's points. The new default messages will be more
confusing to end users and should be reverted, for all of the reasons
Sam mentions.
-Ryan
On Dec 1, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Sam Gendler wrote:
+1 for new extended default messages! It is worth wading through a
sea of
PMs to save d
Good evening!
I have written my own validator which works excellent - as long as a value
is submitted in the field to be validated. Have I missed something here?
What should I do?
To add a required validator may seem to be the obvious solution but the
thing is that the field is not always requir
I've got this working for pages and components, but it's probably a bit
different than what you want. I have a template table in my database
and I'm looking up content by a numeric PK rather than a name because I
have a requirement to let users version some templates. I'm also
leaving out my
I've used JavaMail (http://java.sun.com/products/javamail)
successfully in a few projects. One thought is to inject the
javax.mail.Session object into an application state object for easier
access via Tapestry.
Cheers,
Bill
On 11/26/06, Cyrille37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
I still
hi
My english is not well,so i write simplely,hope you can understand.
I edit the TimeTracker example.
I change the updateComponent content (For example set descriptionField),but
not have effect.
If I not change ,it work good.
Can you tell me ,what's the proplem? Thanks.
Error Info:
DEBUG: 18:31
The question is wrong.
The problem is solved.
I found this: http://lombok.demon.co.uk/tapestry4Demo/TestPopupSource.html
Stef
> Hello!
>
> I have a page, with a javascript:
> function openPopup(startValue){
> var win2=window.open("./app/ListValues&startValue="+startValue,"Listed
> Values","width
Hello!
I have a page, with a javascript:
function openPopup(startValue){
var win2=window.open("./app/ListValues&startValue="+startValue,"Listed
Values","width=600px, height=600px, resizable=yes, center=yes, menubar=no,
scrollbars=yes, status=yes, minimize=no, maximize=no, help=no")
win2.creator=
After searching a while ... using a mass of "searchWords" I found this.
http://www.nabble.com/Validatable-fields%3A-should-bound-property-be-updated-if-in-error--tf247395.html#a691248
This describes what I want... but not how I activate or if it´s still
builded in!?!!
Skorpien126 wrote:
>
>
Hello,
It's me again ...
I'm searching how to replace an @InjectPage annotation by a page
specification like
The java code is :
@InjectPage("Login")
public abstract Login getLoginPage();
And I would like to remove the annotation and replace it by a page
specification like :
But i
12 matches
Mail list logo
