Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> Ahhh I see now.
>
> I think we'll have to come up with a different attribute name for that
> case.
> Probably something like the familiar : syntax?
Yea, that was what i had in mind when i suggested
I feel inherit-specification=true/false is not needed at all
>
> Either way
Ahhh I see now.
I think we'll have to come up with a different attribute name for that case.
Probably something like the familiar : syntax?
Either way it will work the same way, but thank you for bringing it up so I
don't code myself into a corner for this. (other than whatever other corners
I m
Hate to slow you down Jesse, that's what I (also) fear i'm doing here ...
My question is: how will the author of @UserTable extend @CoolerTable ?
CoolerTable's class is org.apache.tapestry.contrib.table.components.Table
( CoolerTable only has template enhancments) so, if he writes
class UserTabl
You didn't say what @CoolerTable has to do with @UserTable.
If @UserTable extends @CoolerTable and @CoolerTable hasn't set
inherit-specification to no AND @UserTable also hasn't set this to no then
@UserTable would:
-) Get all properties/assets/etc inherited from @CoolerTable and Table,
except f
What I fear of is this:
we already have
@Table uses class org.apache.tapestry.contrib.table.components.Table
Now, assume a library offers
@CoolerTable also uses class
org.apache.tapestry.contrib.table.components.Table
which has better html, perhaps additional assets, e.t.c.
What would now hap
But java only supports single inheritance.
On 8/27/06, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm...
I may be totally wrong, I just have the feeling that having something like
I've already created it, it's called "inherit-specification"...
>
> Description:
>
> If yes (the default), all elements
Hmmm...
I may be totally wrong, I just have the feeling that having something like
I've already created it, it's called "inherit-specification"...
>
> Description:
>
> If yes (the default), all elements contained in any superclass components
> will be
> directly inherited in this specificati
I've already created it, it's called "inherit-specification"...
Description:
If yes (the default), all elements contained in any superclass components
will be
directly inherited in this specification.(this includes
parameters/properties/assets/etc..)
No one should get their hopes up too mu
Are you thinking about a new 'inherits' or 'extends' attribute in the
element ?
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> Ok...I'm giving the whole "inheritance" thing a go..We'll see how that
> works
> out ;)
>
> On 8/27/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Humm, so the inheritance is actually easyer
Ok...I'm giving the whole "inheritance" thing a go..We'll see how that works
out ;)
On 8/27/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Humm, so the inheritance is actually easyer that the inclusion of an
external .xml... ok, the inheritance is the best solution by far so good
news!
Has for the
Humm, so the inheritance is actually easyer that the inclusion of an
external .xml... ok, the inheritance is the best solution by far so good
news!
Has for the .xml and so on... thanks for the tip. :-D
On 8/28/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think it needs to be as complica
I agree. Geoff great work mate. Thumbs up to you.
I use spindle all the time. I am still using tap3 and this gives me
one more reason to not upgrade. Life without spindle would be very
difficult using eclipse. I wish Geoff all the best for his future and
I hope that his work is picked up by someo
I don't think it needs to be as complicated as you think.
There is a whole set of classes people don't normally see that encapsulate
all of the information parsed from templates. It wouldn't be very hard to
walk up the class heirarchy and create a "union" view of a template.
As for filename exte
By the way... since we're diging into this...
Again from the wiki...
*"Rename the template page from *.page to *.xml or *.page.xml* This feature
would allow the IDE to provide some completion and validate the template"
If we didn't break compatibility with the use of the previous excception
simp
Don't you sleep Jesse? :-D
Another lightning fast response, thanks!
Gathering the bullet item from the wiki...
*
*
*"Default Page/JWC Files and/or Page/JWC Inheritance* Often there is a need
to use the exact same services/beans/etc one multiple pages. The current
solution is to add them to all t
JWC inheritance would be very cool. I know this is one wall I've run up
against in the past.
On 8/28/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think inherited jwc configurations are part of the 4.1 wishlist.
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry41WishList
Besides that, annotations are
Not very good news to the Tapestry project this one!
Here and there the IDE and Tools support for tapestry issue arise and all
kinds of opinions are issued.
A fact is that every platform needs to have IDE support in order for a very
good chunk of the programmer community to accept a framework. Is
Just thought I'd let people know that these components support the familiar
async/json/updateComponents parameters now as well. (though I think I still
need to add in an optional validateForm parameter on them to fend of likely
future requests for it)
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of
I think inherited jwc configurations are part of the 4.1 wishlist.
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry41WishList
Besides that, annotations are definitely the way to go to get inheritance
today. I would love nothing more than to be able to use them exclusively -
but I don't think I'd be able
Hi all,
Been creating a component lybrary that is composed of several tapestry
components with some add-ons or default customizations and a bunch of new
ones.
Been having a very repeating anoyance in doing this and would like to get
opinions on how to do this the best way, or if this is really so
I found this problem on tacos-beta2 and it is still present in tacos4.
Since upgrading to tacos4 I experience a problem which I beloive is
related to this problem:
I have a list of recuring component groups each containing several
input components. For each of these recuring component groups ther
Hi
I find that if I click on an AjaxLinkSubmit link twice - the second
time before the 1st click's result could be rendered - the browser
gets directed to the webserver root.
In other words if I am on http://localhost:8080/myapp/balhabla and I
click twice I get directed to http://localhost:8080/
Forgive me, this is my first few hours with ajax/tacos...
I have a application that uses FOP to generate PDF reports.
I am implementing the ajax/tacos ProgressBar example into my app. I have
everything figured out except for when the ProgressWorkerThread has
completed it's job, I need to call a
Try setting focus="ognl:false" on the containing @Form element. If
the issue is the tapestry javascript for focus, than that'll remove
it.
Best of luck,
Josh
On 8/23/06, Xiaoshu Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I have a pecular problem with using Dojo's Editor in IE.
I can take a textarea
Thnx very much Shing
dwi ardi irawan
http://dwiardiirawan.blogs.or.id
Shing Hing Man wrote:
In order to have a particular element selected when
the page is rendered,
you need to set the value parameter of your
PropertySelection model to
the desired value.
You can try the following.
In the Pa
In order to have a particular element selected when
the page is rendered,
you need to set the value parameter of your
PropertySelection model to
the desired value.
You can try the following.
In the PageBeginRenderListener method :
if (not rewinding){
// In render mode
desiredElement = get i
i got a form that contain PropertySelection
i want when i change to edit Mode (DirectLink with parameter)
the PropertySelection automatically to be set based on the parameter
that i give in HTML
Grid(send the parameter) -> From (Edit Mode set the selected of
propertySelction)
example
para
Oooh so it IS possible! I almost felt silly asking but I couldn't
figure out what, for the life of me, was causing such behavior. Right
now, its happening with direct links that take an int as a parameter.
The links seem to work on page 1. click the ajax directlink and page 2
doesnt work and force
Well, I for one am sorry to see any ready and willing go, no matter
what the circumstances... but I hope things get to where they need to
be for you. :-) FWIW, I never used the Spindle plugin but have seen a
few colleagues adopt tapestry at my behest because there was (even
relatively immature, a
29 matches
Mail list logo
