James,
The change resolved the problem that I was having.
Thanks,
Tat
James Carman wrote:
Oh, sorry. I committed a change to my tapernate-example application which
implements this change. For those of you who were encountering this
problem, can you download it and try out the changes? Thank
Tapernate relies on spring's ta-demarcation stuff to mark ta's for rollback.
So, if something happens above your dao-layer, spring can't know it.
I override DirectService to this end, see below. Something similar should
also work with
tapernate-style SessionFactory instead of "svc".
public class
LOL LOL LOL LOL!!
Regards
Varun Mehta
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
imagination is more important than knowledge - albert einstein
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Visit Varun at
* http://varun.cjb.net [HTML]
* ht
Nice idea. Bad execution.
+1 to giving it the boot.
Geoff
On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we
receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less
enthusiastic about its continued operat
Jesse Kuhnert gmail.com> writes:
> I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we
> receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less
> enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending
> emails to our users list goes)
+1
--
We sell e-mail lists and soft for email marketing!
1. 90 millions fresh e-mail (date - 1.05.06, delivery - 95%) - 2500$
2. 2 CD lists by country, servers, adult, casino, farma.
we have many list and bases, please write us [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m2f
Sent fro
Thanks all :-)
I'm indeed using Tomcat, I'll go with the tapestry solution instead. Thanks
regards,
On 5/10/06, Dennis Cieplik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> If anyone successfully tested Michael Henderson's DynamicBlock in Tap4?
> The
> error I had encountered was 'factory already defin
Rob Dennett wrote:
Since that is the case, how do you affect the services of a page?
For example, page 1 of my app is a login page. In order to get to
page 2, there needs to be a user in the database. I can fill in the
username and password fields on page 1 and click submit using
HtmlUnit, but
Oh, sorry. I committed a change to my tapernate-example application which
implements this change. For those of you who were encountering this
problem, can you download it and try out the changes? Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May
Can those of you verify that this fix works (if it actually does)? I can't
actually duplicate the behavior that you saw. But, I think this might be
either a HiveMind bug or we need to beef up the documentation a bit.
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Tapestry is helping me avoid a lot of pain
On 5/10/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:-D
No pain no gain!
On 5/10/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just wondering if I was going to have to write .page files for
every
> .html page that required validation.
> No
:-D
No pain no gain!
On 5/10/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just wondering if I was going to have to write .page files for every
.html page that required validation.
Now that my blindness has been healed, I am happily adding validators=""
to
all tags on all my .html pages :D
You might not believe me, but I only saw the "validators" attribute now. And
I've been looking at that page for the past 2 hours.
On 5/10/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/validation.html
On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just wondering if I was going to have to write .page files for every
.html page that required validation.
Now that my blindness has been healed, I am happily adding validators="" to
all tags on all my .html pages :D
On 5/10/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you do all the bin
If you do all the binding in the .html template, and the class to page
binding in the .application you don't need the .page in Tap4.
Be more specific if this was not the answer you were looking for.
Regards,
On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
In Tapestry 4 when doing val
There are a few validators that come with Tapestry:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/validation.html#validation.fields
You can also define your own via the configuration point
"tapestry.form.validator.Validators".
Martin
On Wed, 10 May 2006 02:22:07 +0300, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL
Hi Rui,
Yes it is possible to do it inline.
Something like:
You can see more examples in:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/tapestry/ComponentReference/ValidField.html
Although this link if for Tap3's ValidField, the validator and translator
attributes are available in TextField in Tap4.
Re
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/validation.html
On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone, someone... Could you provide me with an example of validation in
Tapestry 4? Is it possible to do it inline in the html, something like
?
I have been searching on the net, b
Anyone, someone... Could you provide me with an example of validation in
Tapestry 4? Is it possible to do it inline in the html, something like
?
I have been searching on the net, but the examples that I see are only for
Tapestry 3 and the ones for Tapestry 4 don't touch validation at all.
--
C
Hi all
In Tapestry 4 when doing validation, must I always place the binding tag on
the page specification or can I do it on the .application file?
I am asking because my application uses a fair amount of classes and I am
simply maping pages to classes through the .application file and I am
wonde
Been complaining about this myself, even replied in anger to one previously.
+1!
Whatever has to be done, Rui's idea may be of use. Let's all press this on.
On 5/9/06, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jesse, you said you're not looking for a consensus, but in case you
change your mind here it
Consider it a vote for better Tapestry documentation.
Paul Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/09/2006 01:47 PM
Please respond to
"Tapestry users"
To
"Tapestry users"
cc
Subject
Re: publicnudity
On May 9, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Martin Strand wrote:
>> One of the only websites on the interne
On May 9, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Martin Strand wrote:
One of the only websites on the internet with real public sex,
Hooray, is it Tapestry based?
The the website, or the public sex?
If the latter, this is a side of Tapestry I never knew about.
P
___
Heh.. The tapestryforums.com owner said he thought it had been disabled
already but promised he'd look at it again when he gets back from vacation.
I forwarded the message below to him.
On 5/9/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the only websites on the internet with real publ
One of the only websites on the internet with real public sex,
Hooray, is it Tapestry based?
On Tue, 09 May 2006 23:02:06 +0300, Apache
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Welcome to Public Invasion. One of the only websites on the internet
with real public sex,
this is not staged. The girls are
Just for the record: I solved it. It appears that the ValidationDelegate
is *not* looking up messages in the resource bundle, but that my own
code did just that, a bit further down the line. So my own code tried to
look up a message that was allready the result of a resource bundle
lookup, and
If you set focus=false, you can at least roll a little of your own
javascript to do the trick. It doesn't take much.
On May 9, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Stephane Decleire wrote:
It seems that it doesn't let the developper much possibilities ...
Isn't there any possibilities to choose at the renderin
First off, we're using Tapestry 3.0.3.
We have a page that conditionally decides which component to render,
choosing from about 10 or different types. Each of these components
have multiple (avg of about 5) components inside. Now, when this page
loads, it loads all 10 components, and all the co
Wow!
looks great!
On 5/9/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess your mouse hoovered over grayed javadoc or
source icons on the way to the popup, that closes the currently open tip and
displays the new one. This is the way overlib works.
I guess that
It seems that it doesn't let the developper much possibilities ...
Isn't there any possibilities to choose at the rendering a specific
field to put the focus on ? :-(
Andreas Bulling wrote:
On 09. Mai 2006 - 18:51:21, Stephane Decleire wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I need to set the focus on a differ
Hi,
> If anyone successfully tested Michael Henderson's DynamicBlock in Tap4?
> The
> error I had encountered was 'factory already defined' java.lang.error. The
> example that downloaded from Michael Henderson's website has the same
> error.
The example works in jetty and breaks in tomcat. I tr
On 09. Mai 2006 - 18:51:21, Stephane Decleire wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I need to set the focus on a different element of a form than the
| default one.
| I've tried to find this functionnality in the validationdelegate wihout
| success.
-> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/tapestry/ComponentRefere
I do use Creator when I want to test listener methods, but I also want to use
HtmlUnit to check the rendered output. I don't know how to give my page the
input it needs to render that output. The pages in question derive the input
from an injected service which draws the info from the database
Hi all,
I need to set the focus on a different element of a form than the
default one.
I've tried to find this functionnality in the validationdelegate wihout
success.
Any idea is welcome.
--
Stéphane Decleire
05 56 57 99 20
06 63 78 69 06
Jesse, you said you're not looking for a consensus, but in case you
change your mind here it goes:+1
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Ok it looks like there's a general consensus.
Any word from tapestryforums ? (I found the cc'ed email addy on the site)
On 5/9/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
> On 5/9/06, linuja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Henri. The code in the wiki(
>> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/PopupLinkSubmit) is not full,
>> can
>> you show the *PopupLinkSubmit.script*, *PopupLinkSubmit.jwc* and the
>> PopupDirectLink.java?
>
>
> Sorry, I forgot them. I have P
On 5/9/06, linuja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Henri. The code in the wiki(
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/PopupLinkSubmit) is not full, can
you show the *PopupLinkSubmit.script*, *PopupLinkSubmit.jwc* and the
PopupDirectLink.java?
Sorry, I forgot them. I have PopupDirectLink too b
Just update JL and grab version 1.4.1 and you are good to go with E3.2
(and thank Brian - he built it!)
Geoff
On 5/9/06, Gentry, Michael (Contractor) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geoff:
Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I
tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back
I guess your mouse hoovered over grayed javadoc or source
icons on the way to the popup, that closes the currently open tip and displays
the new one. This is the way overlib works.
I guess that easy fix would be to display popups only by onmouseclick hook
rather tha
Hmm, maybe I should grab the latest 3.2 build and try it again. It was
about 1 month ago when I last tried it. Maybe I can convince my
co-worker to give it a shot, too.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
-Original Message-
From: Brian K. Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And if I'm going to reply like that, I should stress what should be
stressed: 1.4.1 works ONLY for Eclipse 3.2 - not previous versions.
1.3.0 is still the latest for Eclipse 3.1.
Brian K. Wallace wrote:
> I'm not Geoff... but JettyLauncher 1.4.1 is ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not Geoff... but JettyLauncher 1.4.1 is out which supports Eclipse
3.2. If there are any issues with it working, let me know.
Brian
Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote:
> Geoff:
>
> Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometim
i'm using it as we speak in 3.2 Linux. No problems at all here...
Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote:
Geoff:
Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I
tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back and JettyLauncher had issues
(couldn't display the panels correctly and couldn
On 09. Mai 2006 - 10:21:45, Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
| Ok it looks like there's a general consensus.
|
| Any word from tapestryforums ? (I found the cc'ed email addy on the site)
I would say: Just do it!
I've never seen something similar on any other list I was subscribed to.
If the people using the
Geoff:
Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I
tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back and JettyLauncher had issues
(couldn't display the panels correctly and couldn't launch Jetty). This
isn't a big deal for me (yet) as I use a PowerPC-based Mac and I just
went back t
Thanks for the explanation.
What about if each one of us sends him an email asking to fix it? He'll get
an idea of what we're going through.
On 5/9/06, Wayland Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The forum administrator has installed forwarding software that will send
an
email to our list for each
Ok it looks like there's a general consensus.
Any word from tapestryforums ? (I found the cc'ed email addy on the site)
On 5/9/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are people really taking the time to manually post spam to the forum, or
have they circumvented the "captcha" feature of ta
Are people really taking the time to manually post spam to the forum, or
have they circumvented the "captcha" feature of tapestryforums.com?
-Original Message-
From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:12 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: tapestryforums.
The forum administrator has installed forwarding software that will send an
email to our list for each post that gets posted to his forum. Problem is he
has little spam protection, so people spamming his forums get their posts
automatically forwarded to us lucky folk on this list.
On 5/9/06, Rui
+2 ;-)
On 09. Mai 2006 - 09:26:36, Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
| I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we
| receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less
| enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending
| emails to our use
I don't think people should have to add filters to their mail client for
things like this. It's the ~only~ list I'm subscribed to that gets spam and
I find it highly annoying/embarrassing as it's a project I'm part of.
I'm not looking for consensus so much as a response from the
tapestryforums.co
I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm missing
something on the chain of events.
Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many people
answering questions there.
On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROT
+1!
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 9:27 AM
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Subject: tapestryforums.com
I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we
receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every da
We went through this exact same thread like 2months ago but nothing came out
of it so I created a filter to delete all incoming mail from the forums.
It's been working great, totally forgot about it until you guys brought it
up here.
I suggest you do the same until consensus is gained to kick the
+1
Stop sending mails from the forum to the list. This is really annoying.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 15:27
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Subject: tapestryforums.com
I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapest
Whenever I need to do that I simply use an ognl call in the columns
binding to retrieve the list of columns that should be shown.
Just as you would need a getSource method for this in the container,
so do you need a getColumns method that returns a string. The string
follows the same form
On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or
discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter
but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the
proper entities at th
I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we
receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less
enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending
emails to our users list goes)
Please find a way to fix your user registration t
Hehe, never mind; just saw you had a response -- still battling my junk
e-mail filters with the new list-address.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:16 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Concatenating strings in OGNL
Hi,
how can I con
Hi Mark,
What you have should be working fine -- are you getting an error? Go
ahead and try it if you haven't already.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:16 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Concatenating strings in OGNL
Hi,
how can
How can you add or remove a column at runtime with the tableView component?
-jm
This is don't working here..
This is my page
literal:nome:
family.page.list.table.name:nome
but tapestry print family.page.list.table.name not Name ... The others
messages it print
On 5/8/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just omit the "message:" part, like this
Hi, Henri. The code in the wiki(
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/PopupLinkSubmit) is not full, can
you show the *PopupLinkSubmit.script*, *PopupLinkSubmit.jwc* and the
PopupDirectLink.java?
Thanks,
linuja
2006/5/5, Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 5/3/06, Wes Bramhall <[EMAIL PROTE
Yea, really nice service.
But those tooltips get on my nerves... they close before i hover into
them...
grr
Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On 5/8/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me invite you to try and use the public
Tapestry based application I ha
On 5/8/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me invite you to try and use the public Tapestry
based application I have been developing for a while and my company SourceLabs
supports and hosts
Wow!
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
BTW, there's a little known feature of tacos, the template binding.
With it, you can do:
title="template:${appTitle} - ${sectionTitle}"
Mark wrote:
Weird, now it works.
I got some crazy error which I can not remember any more just now. I
had already taken it out and just tried this one:
stylesh
66 matches
Mail list logo
