sion/subversion-1.14.4.tar.gz.asc
https://www.apache.org/dist/subversion/subversion-1.14.4.zip.asc
For this release, the following people have provided PGP signatures:
Stefan Sperling [rsa2048/4F7DBAA99A59B973] with fingerprint:
8BC4 DAE0 C5A4 D65F 4044 0107 4F7D BAA9 9A59 B973
Natha
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:22:26AM +0530, Sachin wrote:
> Hello friends,
> I am trying to compile the subversion's trunk code.
> It needs *wc-queries.h* file to compile
> The \trunk\subversion\libsvn_wc\wc_db.c file tries to include the *
> wc-queries.h* file which I couldn't find in trunk reposito
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 02:24:00PM -0700, Robert Rohde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to identify a reasonable version control system for an
> unusual workflow. As SVN is a major player in this space, it is one
> of the systems that I want to consider but I've run into some
> problems. It is un
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 07:25:57AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> It's also possible to to "svn add
> svn://hostname/reponame/trunk/filename.txt", or whatever the URL would
> be on the Subversion server. In that case, it won't appear locally
> until you do an "svn update" in the local working re
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:29:50AM +0100, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am developing with Visual C++ Express 2008 on Windows. I needed to add some
> Japanese characters to a source file, whereupon the editor stored the file in
> UTF-16LE encoding. Subversion (1.6.12) now complains that the fi
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:42:36AM +0200, Paul Maier wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> file b should be read-write here; what do you think:
>
>
> Reproduction script:
>
> svn --version
> svnadmin create xx
> svn co "file:///C:/[...]/xx" yy
> cd yy
> echo a > a
> svn add a
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:56:35AM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > Second, many working environments in the UNIX world rely on NFS based
> > home directoies, to share working environments and configurations
> > across a variety of machine
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:55:08PM +0200, Olivier Sannier wrote:
> On 14/10/2010 21:45, Dan Nessett wrote:
> >On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:38:41 -0400, Bob Archer wrote:
> >>>Generally, (using subversion) we
> >>>check out a tagged version into a workspace, recursively delete the
> >>>.svn directories,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:58:19PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > As of 1.6, Subversion asks the user before saving passwords in
> > plaintext. 1.6 also added support for using GNOME Keyring and KDE Wallet
> &g
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:17:59PM +, Dan Nessett wrote:
> My question has to do with bypassing the fetch of the complete new MW
> version into our repository. (NB: MW revisions run about 150MB). Let me
> describe this in more detail.
>
> + When we wish to upgrade to a new MW revision, check
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:48:21PM +, Dan Nessett wrote:
> Bad etiquette to answer my own question, but I just reread the Externals
> Definition section of the book and found this:
>
> "An externals definition can point only to directories, not to files."
> So, what I have described won't wo
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:51:36AM +0100, emerson wrote:
> It was quite surprising today when we were having problems with the
> proxy, and then we noticed that TortoiseSVN would override command
> line svn. Is that suppose to happen?
> After unchecking the proxy configuration on tortoisesvn, the c
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:13:48PM +0200, Paul Maier wrote:
> Hi Stefan!
>
> Thank you for having responded.
>
> Of course, after the commit, the file is read-only.
>
> Sorry. I don't know how to implement this. But it pains me a lot.
You'd need to be able to read and write C code.
> So I need
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> > I'd love to see this deployed, and love to see the protocol updated
> > enough to block the use of the older, less secure clients. But 1.7 has
> > already blown well past its release date of "this summer. If it's not
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 05:24:49AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 05:09:37 +0200:
> > Index: subversion/libsvn_wc/copy.c
> > ===
> > --- subversion/libsvn_wc/copy.c (revision 1023400)
> >
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:14:12AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I share Nico's concerns, and when I did (successfully) try to get the
> > behaviour changed, the community was OK with adding a prompt, but not
&
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 03:14:09PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The gpg-agent password store will be optional and behave just like
> the gnome-keyring and kwallet stores.
Just FYI, the current implementation of this feature doesn't seem
to be usable: http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:30:41PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 14:43:57 +0200:
> > Your patch seems to handle copies only. What about locally added files?
>
> Does this part of the regression patch cover the scenario you have in mind
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:12:15PM +0200, Martin Nowack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to merge form a foreign repository path in a local repository path
> using current svn version 1.6.13 but it fails.
>
> Assuming you have a local empty svn directory:
> svn merge http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Paul Maier wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> > Could you please file an issue in our tracker, linking to this thread?
>
> To be honest, I have no idea about the meaning of all the necessary
> parameters like priority and DEFECT or ENHANCEMENT and target mileston
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:18:10PM +1100, Ben K wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have two svn servers set up in a master-slave mirroring arrangement, using
> HTTPS/SVNDav as the transport mechanism. The underlying link is an IPSEC
> tunnel that links us in behind the firewall of the main part of the
> org
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:44:06AM -0700, lcwakeman wrote:
>
> I am getting the following error message when doing a verify using svnadmin.
> I get the same errors doing a SVN Update with TortoiseSVN.
>
> svnadmin: Corrupt node-revision 'c74-3.0.r3/1150218126'
> svnadmin: Malformed text represe
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:20:32PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 21:17:09 +0200:
> > Andy Levy wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 15:04:29 -0400:
> > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 14:54, Andersen, Krista
> > > wrote:
> > > > I tried posting a question to this use
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:49:03PM -, Hutchinson, Steve (UK) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently we are attempting to use svn externals to help build various
> projects from what I would call a few "reuse" repositories. We are
> attempting to be "structured" as to what level of design hierarchy we
> a
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:03:58AM -0400, Jack Repenning wrote:
> If you do switch to the approach Stefan suggests (and I agree, it's
> probably more satisfactory) you also might want to use "svn switch"
> instead of the svn:externals. You'll still have the auditable,
> versioned definition of your
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 11:52:18AM +0100, Paul Maier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> svn mv corrupts (locks) the WC, if the WC is in root of Windows drive.
Please see http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3346
Stefan
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:04:19PM +0100, Paul Maier wrote:
> C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Test2\Desktop\svn\1\yy>svn export "1 2" X
> svn: »1%202« ist nicht unter Versionskontrolle
Thanks, see http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3745
I have a fix and will commit it shortly.
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:24:03AM -, Hutchinson, Steve (UK) wrote:
> >Do it the other way: Store your component configuration in a versioned
> >file or even a database, and write a script to configure svn:externals
> >properties based on that data. Maybe even add an automated check into
> >the
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:14:24AM +, ullrich.j...@elektrobit.com wrote:
> TortoiseSVN works on both machines. (1.6.8, svn libs 1.6.11)
>
> Command line svn client creates the issue on machine B, not on machine A.
> Version of the command line client: 1.6.12, was also tested with 1.6.1
> The
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:37:02AM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010 schrieb Daniel Shahaf:
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3727
> >
> > Chris Seawood wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:04:17 -0700:
>
> Hi,
>
> our workflow currently does not
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:03:37PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
>
> > The bug has been fixed in trunk. The fix has not been nominated for
> > backport to 1.6.x yet but I will do so shortly.
> >
> > Until the fix appears in a new Subversion release, you can go back to
> > 1.6.12. Alternative
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:12:44AM -0500, Patricia A Moss wrote:
> I think this is the correct mailing list for this question.
>
> I am LDAP authenticating against 2 domain controllers; in 2 different
> locations.
> I thought that I was locking down each repository to allow only users,
> include
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:41:41PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Klaus Ganser wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 21:19:24 -0800:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a simple feature request for the svn update command, so I'd
> > like some feedback on the utility of this feature. In the past, I've
>
> Sounds us
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:48:01PM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> I do think it's a bug, but I was never able to find enough info to make it
> into a bug report. I kept all the good & bad versions of the repository...
> I ran the "svnadmin verify" all over the place (which is enormously tim
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:55:49PM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> >
> > > It's 100% consistent. I get the same checksum error, on the same file,
> > every time. I have a supposed "good" copy of the s
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 03:10:19PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:29:14 +0100:
> > I'm not sure what svnadmin verify is doing wrong in your case.
> > But I know that there are corruptions it doesn't detect, and we'r
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:43:35PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the advantage of using
>
> ^/trunk/project/subproj...@40 subproject
This new format does support relative URLs.
> compared to
>
> -r 40 ^/trunk/project/subproject subproject
This old format doesn'
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:55:17PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 16. November 2010 schrieb Stefan Sperling:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:43:35PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what is the advantage of using
> &
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:11:49PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The new format is as follows: '[-rN] u...@m] PATH'
> The old format was: 'PATH [-rN] URL'
>
> The real difference between the old and new formats is that the URL cannot
> have a peg revi
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:48:07AM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
> I converted CVSNT respositoy to SVN repository some days ago, and config
> mod_dav_svn in Apache http.conf.
>
>
> When I try 'svn log http://192.168.105.4:8000/svn/cmcc', it shown some logs
> but
> failed/terminated at some revisions
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:00:25PM +1100, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a question about completely overwriting a destination file with a
> merge.
> I have been doing;
> svn merge -r1:head trunk/somefile branches/somefeature/somefile
>
> As long as I continue to choose "Their
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:06:19PM +, LiuYan 刘研 wrote:
> My orginal idea is:
> If this "svn: REPORT of " error is returned by mod_dav_svn, can it act
> friendly
> as the same as svnserve ?
> I mean, if the revprops files are not in UTF-8 encoding, don't return REPORT
> Failed to client side,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:40:42PM +1000, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just found (another) issue with using URL-only renames. If one of the
> > parent directories has svn:mergeinfo recorded on it, then renaming a file
> > vi
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:38:57PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> I don't see why it matters that it's a "sub-branch". It's still a
> (grand-)child of mybranch, so can perfectly inherit that mergeinfo.
> AFAIU it only needs explicit mergeinfo if it starts to deviate from
> the mybranch root (e.g.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 02:55:30PM +0100, Ludwig, Michael wrote:
> Replying to myself now that I realize the issue:
>
> > From: Ludwig, Michael [mailto:michael.lud...@delphi-mb.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 3:21 PM
>
> > > > what is the advantage of using
> > > >
> > > > ^/trunk/proj
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:55:51PM +0200, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
> After merging changes from a branch different from the working one
> I could get files added on that other branch, and the svn stat
> would look like:
>
> M .
> A +a_new_file
>
> Issuing svn diff at this point does
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:39:00PM +0800, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using the latest (stable) version on both Linux and WinSlows.
>
> For one of my repositories, I created a daily tag of a diary.
>
> Example:
> /project/trunk/important_stuff
> /project/tags/2010-11-20/important_
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:36:01PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Hyrum Wright wrote:
> > I'm happy to announce Apache Subversion 1.6.15. This release contains
> > several bug fixes, including two which can cause client-initiated
> > crashes on the server. We
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:27:28PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> [ sorry if I'm repeating; haven't read the whole thread ]
>
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:05:15 +0100:
> > FWIW, you do have a point, Andrey (and others), that this is a valid
> > use case (finding the rev in whi
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:01:24PM +0100, Tina Vießmann wrote:
> see log file
>
> Version: 1.6.12 (SlikSvn/1.6.12) WIN32, compiled Jun 22 2010, 20:45:23
Have you tried upgrading to the latest version of sliksvn?
Your binaries are dated from June 2010.
There was a crash problem in the sliksvn bi
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:28:13AM -0800, George Workman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have confirmed that svnserve is up and running as a daemon. I'm able to
> use
> it locally (on the server itself) and I am also able to connect to the
> repository using Tortoise SVN from a Windows Vista machine by usi
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:20:54PM +0100, Victor Engmark wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Andy Levy wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 02:50, Victor Engmark
> > wrote:
> >> It would be very useful to be able to compile Subversion to use a
> >> different path than /etc/subversion/config for
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 01:50:09AM -0500, derek fong wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's my scenario, hope someone can help me out with it:
>
> I created a branch (b1) from trunk several months ago. Since then, my branch
> has undergone active development while the trunk has undergone a couple of
> rela
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:09:45PM +0100, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 20:27, Kris Deugau wrote:
> > Daniel Albuschat wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd like to create a branch from trunk and periodically merge trunk
> >> into my branch to stay up to date with what happens in trunk.
> >> A
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:35:59PM +0100, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Mauro Condarelli,
> am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2010 um 15:34 schrieben Sie:
>
> > I would rather not checkout a fresh copy, move all changes to it and
> > submit that, if possible, because it is too error-prone.
>
> Som
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:31:47PM -0500, Bob Archer wrote:
> > We are planning to upgarde Subversion from 1.4.2 to 1.4.9. But i
> > have a couple of questions regarding this.
> > 1)what are the changes in 1.4.9 from 1.4.2 in terms of release
> > notes?
>
> 1.4 is very out of date. That's probably
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:03:00PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I see here a strange behavior of subversion:
>
> I have a local modification:
>
>
> $ svn diff
> Index: README
> ===
> --- README (revision 929)
> +++
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:44:05AM -0600, Mark Meyer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I am currently using svn commit hooks in our environment to trap ALL
> commits. The commit hook sends an email to my address.
>
>
>
> A typical email generated by a commit looks like this:
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 09:34:05AM -0500, Nick wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At some point in the last year I stopped being able to access my SVN
> repository remotely via https using the SVN CLI and TortoiseSVN on
> Windows. Unfortunately since I hadn't used svn on my windows machine
> for a long time (m
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:02:57PM +0300, Jacob V. Dlougach wrote:
> Version: 1.6.12 (SlikSvn/1.6.12) X64, compiled Jun 22 2010, 21:00:06
This sliksvn version is known to be broken. Don't use it. Please upgrade.
See http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2010-09/0065.shtml
Stefan
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:40:25AM +0100, ge0mr ge0tl wrote:
> I thank in advance who will spend time to answer
>
> Snapshot:
>
> Machine A: Debian installation on amd64 dual-core and eclipse-helios-64 with
> svn perspective and Subversive SVN Team Provider Connector. NO JavaHL
> Connector (it ha
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:47:40AM +, stuart wrote:
> >svn ci -m "svn lock trouble" .
> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: Can't get exclusive lock on file
> '/media/stuart/svn/ca/db/txn-current-lock': No locks available
>
> I had done a svn mkdir and svn moved a bunch of files to it
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:00:29PM +, HM 2K wrote:
> I'm having some trouble accessing the svn via Apache, with the following
> error:
>
> "Could not open the requested SVN filesystem"
>
> I've recently upgraded CentOS from 4 to 5 and upgraded SVN along with it.
>
> I have verified and recov
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:50:27PM -0600, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> I have observed some regressions with
>
> log -v -g --xml http://server/repo/path
>
> output in 1.6.15 that were not present in 1.6.13. I see a lot of -g
> changes
> in this new version.
Hi Kevin,
There are three
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 04:42:16PM -0500, r...@elilabs.com wrote:
> Any idea why TSVN 1.6.12 Build 20536 2010/11/24 claims to be using SVN
> 1.6.15 before it was released?
TortoiseSVN doesn't follow skips in version numbers that occasionally
happen between Subversion releases.
E.g. the entry for
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 05:07:44PM -0500, r...@elilabs.com wrote:
> I am not subscribed to the dev or announce lists, and the header says this
> is the users list, and my installed TSVN's "about" shows 11/24. I cannot
> imagine how this would have ended up on dev or announce. :-\
Ah, I misunders
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 09:39:55AM -0800, sajan wrote:
> hi
> is there any way I can avoid adding particular folders/files when I
> add my code to subversion.In git you can do that using .gitignore
> file.
>
> suppose I have this directory structure
>
> mycode
> |tobeignored1
> |tobei
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:03:16PM -0800, David wrote:
> ./svnadmin create --pre-1.5-compatible /local/svnroot/repository/one
> #start the ./subversion/bin/svnserve
How did you really invoke svnserve? Did you pass any options?
You need to tell svnserve where to find repositories.
This is done wit
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:23:33PM -0800, sajan wrote:
> hi,
>
> I was using subversion on windows.I set SVN_EDITOR env variable to
> notepad.exe.Then I created a repository using svnadmin and tried to
> import a project to it.
> Suppose my original codebase is at C:\code\myproject,I want to creat
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:25:55PM +0800, 谢带达 wrote:
> Thank you Stefan.
>
> I start svnserve this way:
>
> /local/svnroot/repository/one/conf/svnserve.conf
> [general]
> anon-access =
> auth-access = write
> password-db = passwd
> authz-db = authz
> /local/svnroot/repository/one/conf/authz
> [/]
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:28:29PM -0500, David Weintraub wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM, David Aldrich
> wrote:
> > Thanks for your help. Yes, the branches, tags, and trunk directories are at
> > the root. In your suggestion, I am worried that a developer might create a
> > branch co
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 09:12:13AM +0800, David Xie wrote:
> Thanks Stefan.
>
> Wow, it really works when disable authz. This means I could access to svn://
> 172.18.127.148/test (read and write) and successfully to view log
> history. Hard to believe!
> #authz-db = authz
>
> And the logs are sho
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:09:24PM -, Echlin, Jamie wrote:
> Afternoon,
>
> For some client-side Tortoise hooks (which are for the purpose of
> preventing people shoot themselves in the head in all the myriad ways
> Subversion allows), I need to get the ancestor-branch, ie where the
> current
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 04:54:27PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> Is there a way to prevent svn from creating a $HOME/.subversion
> directory? I know how to make it put the directory in a different
> location using --config-dir=/wherever, but I want to avoid creating
> it entirely. I can't find an
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:34:09PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I don't think there is an official way to prevent the config dir from
> > being created. I'd be interested to know why you need this. What is
> > your use
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:09:23AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 9:56 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> >
> >Yes, every svn subcommand creates it, and it has been pointed out before
> >that this might not be necessary.
> >However, I'm wondering i
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:56:17AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 10:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> >>If you don't need to write/modify something there, why should it be
> >>created if it doesn't already exist? Can't you defer the dec
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 05:26:08PM +0200, Jaan Vajakas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using SVN version 1.6.15 on openSUSE 11.3 (x86).and have the
> following issue.
>
> I have an NTFS partition mounted with the following line in /etc/fstab:
> /dev/disk/by-id/ata-SAMSUNG_HM250HI_S1RUJ9FZ801112-part1 /wind
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 01:28:34PM -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On 12/27/10 11:34 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >On Dec 24, 2010, at 23:34, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> >
> >>Unfortunately, the documentation and utilities in a few places are less
> >>clear than they could be when discussing repos
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 08:58:43AM -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On 12/28/10 3:44 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >The important bit about security is that admins understand how to configure
> >the application they're setting up. They can then configure it securely.
&g
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:11:47PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> As Stefan pointes out elsewhere, svnserve will run without an
> svnserve.conf. Perhaps it *shouldn't*, and the default svnserve.conf
> should be published as svnserve.conf.tmpl? That would force manual
> enabling of a service that
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:43:13AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:11:47PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >> As Stefan pointes out elsewhere, svnserve will run without an
> >>
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:03:16AM -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On 12/29/10 8:34 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >>The initial concern raised in this thread was that there might exist
> >>a hypothetical e
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> create-svn-repos.sh:
> #!/bin/sh
> svnadmin create $1
> rm -f $1/conf/svnserve.conf
Of course, you would also need to delete svnserve from the system
and somehow make sure that no local user can compile their
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:32:01PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > create-svn-repos.sh:
> > #!/bin/sh
> > svnadmin create $1
> > rm -f $1/conf/svnserve.conf
>
> Of course, you would also
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 05:02:55PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:48:16 +0100:
> > It would be nice if the outcome of this thread was a document detailing
> > requirements and solutions for a secure, apache-only subversion setup
>
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:29:22PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> You've just made my point that it should be automated upstream.
Instead of riding on the obvious shortcomings of a two-line shell
script I was using to badly illustrate an idea, why don't you spend
time writing up a "Setting up S
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 11:58:09PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On 12/30/10 7:29 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >You may conveniently argue that you don't care about this problem
> >because it doesn't concern you. But Subversion developers cannot just
> >add op
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:30:23AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is going to be a long post and actually a repost of what I asked
> in Debian forum few days ago.
> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=58799 but got no answer.
>
> This is from svn version 1.6.12 .
>
>
> H
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 12:51:41PM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Due to some recent press releases and blog posts by WANdisco, Inc, the
> Apache Software Foundation has felt it necessary to post a response:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apache_subversion_to_wandisco_1
>
> It basica
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:19:20PM -0500, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 15:56, Nick wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 11:49 -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
> >> > Apologies in advance if this is covered somewhere, but can someone
> >> > explain (or point me to some references on) why using
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:35:08PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 11:58:09PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> > I don't care how you do that. As long as it's easily
> > understandable, preferably to both existing users and new ones.
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:47:52PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 22:22:18 +0200:
> > It's hacky, but:
> >
> > svn commit --changelist :glob:'*.foo'
> >
> > where the "changelist" is then interpreted as a glob pattern
> > (let's say apr_fnmatch()).
> >
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:56:48AM +1000, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > = Impact on the repository format =
> >
> > A format bump (in REPOS/format, not REPOS/db/format) is required.
> > The new feature shall only be
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:26:30AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> (btw, do we have a way to say "except files in $this changelist"?)
I don't think we do.
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:20:52PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:35 PM, NN Ott wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a source library that I need to periodically import (and then patch)
> > for use by my code base.
> >
> > The SVN Book seems to reccomend a "vendor branch" s
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:25:11PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> This is a very large and longstanding issue for me and others, and has
> led to clients of mine rejecting Subversion outright. And it looks
> like a legacy of Subversion's re-implementation of CVS, described as
> "CVS done right".
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:43:31AM -0500, NN Ott wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > I have a source library that I need to periodically import (and then
> > patch)
> > > > for use by my code base.
> > > >
> > > > The SVN Book seems to reccomend a "vendor branch" scheme where you keep
> > a
> > > > patched
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:17:33PM -0500, NN Ott wrote:
> That's exactly right.
>
> Should I post this to the dev list?
No. Your question is clearly a usage question so it is not appropriate
for the dev list.
Have a look at piston: http://piston.rubyforge.org/
Maybe that comes somewhat close to
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:36:58PM -0500, NN Ott wrote:
> >
> >
> > >> To recap, as Les put it:
> > >>
> > >> I think the idea is that he'd like to see the development history of
> > both the vendor and local changes as a continuous set of changes as you
> > would if they were in the same repositor
1 - 100 of 1648 matches
Mail list logo
