"Hartleroad, James [IT]" writes:
> Just trying to get a better understanding on why svnlook shows the
> files when reviewing one commit and not the other, when both commits
> "changed" what was in the repository, at least to the point that the
> files are copied to the new location.
You might wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Hartleroad, James [IT] [mailto:james.hartler...@sprint.com]
> Sent: maandag 23 november 2015 17:24
> To: Ivan Zhakov
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: svnlook changed doesn't include all of the files that are part of
&g
to the new
location.
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 8:51 AM
To: Hartleroad, James [IT]
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svnlook changed doesn't include all of the files that are part of
the commit
On 23 Nove
James [IT] [mailto:james.hartler...@sprint.com]
Sent: maandag 23 november 2015 15:30
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svnlook changed doesn't include all of the files that are part of
the commit
Why doesn't svnlook changed show all of the files that are part of the
commit?
A dev
On 23 November 2015 at 17:29, Hartleroad, James [IT]
wrote:
> Why doesn’t svnlook changed show all of the files that are part of the
> commit?
>
> A developer created a new directory with two files in a branch and the
> branch was merged into another branch. When running svnlook it shows the
> di
Why doesn't svnlook changed show all of the files that are part of the commit?
A developer created a new directory with two files in a branch and the branch
was merged into another branch. When running svnlook it shows the directory
was added, but not the included files. If I run a svn diff wi
