Re: ignore ancestry and record only

2012-10-02 Thread chroyer
> > It's unfortunate that you don't want to go into details here. Sorry, I did not want to muddy the water...but let me try. The items I am tracking originate from a different version control system in which we implemented an artificial way to branch (using batch files). That tree will be used

Re: ignore ancestry and record only

2012-10-02 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:35:19AM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > Am 01.10.2012 21:07, schrieb chroyer: > >I was wondering if the following scenario makes sense, or if this is > >asking for problems. > > > > * I am regularly merging differences between 2 trees (I won't go in > >too much details

Re: ignore ancestry and record only

2012-10-02 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 01.10.2012 21:07, schrieb chroyer: I was wondering if the following scenario makes sense, or if this is asking for problems. * I am regularly merging differences between 2 trees (I won't go in too much details here...those tree are not really under my control; I put those them in the tags

ignore ancestry and record only

2012-10-01 Thread chroyer
Hi all, I was wondering if the following scenario makes sense, or if this is asking for problems. * I am regularly merging differences between 2 trees (I won't go in too much details here...those tree are not really under my control; I put those them in the tags area, and I want to merge the