Re: Spurious "server ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol" error

2023-04-19 Thread Pavel Lyalyakin via users
th doesn't exist. > > If the address actually resolves to something, it is impossible to say if > that result is wrong (compared to what you expect). Thus the error message > can only say "we found a server at the requested address but it doesn't > want to speak to us"

Re: Spurious "server ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol" error

2023-04-19 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den ons 19 apr. 2023 kl 16:47 skrev Ian Miller : > This is not a problem on the server. As I wrote in my original e-mail, > there is no network traffic at all between the client and server in the > failure case. > > I have confirmed this by reproducing the problem when the server has its > networ

Re: Spurious "server ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol" error

2023-04-19 Thread Ian Miller
O/S to Debian 11, and with it the subversion client to > version 1.14.1 (r1886195), I started getting > the following error whenever I tried to access the server: > > svn: E175003: The server at 'http://svn/singularis/trunk > <http://svn/singularis/trunk>' does not supp

Re: Spurious "server ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol" error

2023-04-17 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
> the following error whenever I tried to access the server: > > svn: E175003: The server at 'http://svn/singularis/trunk' does not > support the HTTP/DAV protocol > > I checked to see what the network traffic associated with this and found > that there was none. I get

Spurious "server ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol" error

2023-04-17 Thread Ian Miller
: The server at 'http://svn/singularis/trunk' does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol I checked to see what the network traffic associated with this and found that there was none. I get the same error attempting make a new checkout. However if I substitute the server’s IP address into

Re: Need Support for Error || serialized hash missing terminator

2023-03-17 Thread Bo Berglund
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:06:18 +, "Kumar, Pradeep (Baker Hughes Contractor) via users" wrote: >HI Support Team, > >Can someone please respond on this and help us on the below issue. > >Regards, >Pradeep Kumar. > You will not get any help until you post a

RE: Need Support for Error || serialized hash missing terminator

2023-03-17 Thread Kumar, Pradeep (Baker Hughes Contractor) via users
HI Support Team, Can someone please respond on this and help us on the below issue. Regards, Pradeep Kumar. From: Pallapati, Raja (Baker Hughes Contractor) Sent: 16 March 2023 17:26 To: users@subversion.apache.org Cc: Kumar, Pradeep (Baker Hughes Contractor) Subject: Need Support for Error

Re: Need Support for Error || serialized hash missing terminator

2023-03-16 Thread Bo Berglund
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:55:46 +, "Pallapati, Raja (Baker Hughes Contractor) via users" wrote: >Hi Team, This is not a support forum but a user peer-to-peer mail list! > >While doing a check-out in the SVN subversion working copy we are receiving >"serialized has

Need Support for Error || serialized hash missing terminator

2023-03-16 Thread Pallapati, Raja (Baker Hughes Contractor) via users
Hi Team, While doing a check-out in the SVN subversion working copy we are receiving "serialized hash missing terminator" error, and unable to update the content. This is delaying our work. Kindly support on this to resolve the issue as early as possible. [cid:image001.png@01D9582

Re: Transaction support for svnadmin dump command in Subversion / user as which to back an SVN repository

2022-04-01 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 3:08 AM Ashim Kapoor wrote: > > Dear Mark, > > Could you please answer my query about the isolation level for > transactions in Subversion? > Is it always the highest which does not allow for any transaction > anomalies ? Is there a switch which lowers the isolation level in

Re: Transaction support for svnadmin dump command in Subversion / user as which to back an SVN repository

2022-04-01 Thread Ashim Kapoor
Dear Mark, Could you please answer my query about the isolation level for transactions in Subversion? Is it always the highest which does not allow for any transaction anomalies ? Is there a switch which lowers the isolation level in Subversion transactions (at the risk of introducing transaction

Re: Transaction support for svnadmin dump command in Subversion / user as which to back an SVN repository

2022-03-31 Thread Ashim Kapoor
Dear Mark, Many thanks for the explanation. Best Regards, Ashim On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 4:45 PM Mark Phippard wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:47 AM Ashim Kapoor wrote: > > > My fs-type is fsfs. > > > > My svn version is 1.10.4 > > > > I am using a project management tool called Redmine wh

Re: Transaction support for svnadmin dump command in Subversion / user as which to back an SVN repository

2022-03-31 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:47 AM Ashim Kapoor wrote: > My fs-type is fsfs. > > My svn version is 1.10.4 > > I am using a project management tool called Redmine which is the front > end for SVN projects and which in turn is relying on Apache as a web > server. > > 1. I wish to use : > > svnadmin du

Transaction support for svnadmin dump command in Subversion / user as which to back an SVN repository

2022-03-31 Thread Ashim Kapoor
But does SVN support concurrency while using svnadmin dump? I do not mind losing out information on that ONE commit since the next day that ONE particular commit will get dumped into my-repository-backup.dump. Is there any disadvantage to doing an svndump on a LIVE system ? Will we experience transact

Re: Support for ssh agent for storing password encrypted

2019-12-17 Thread Honza Maly
Hello, thanks for answers. On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Honza Maly wrote on Tue, 17 Dec 2019 20:04 +00:00: I don't see it in issue tracker: do you have any plans on adding support for ssh agent as way to store password encrypted, possibly based on what Jack Whitham pre

Re: Support for ssh agent for storing password encrypted

2019-12-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Honza Maly wrote on Tue, 17 Dec 2019 20:04 +00:00: > I don't see it in issue tracker: do you have any plans on adding support > for ssh agent as way to store password encrypted, possibly based on what > Jack Whitham prepared? > > https://www.jwhitham.org/2017/03/svn-pass

Support for ssh agent for storing password encrypted

2019-12-17 Thread Honza Maly
Hello, I don't see it in issue tracker: do you have any plans on adding support for ssh agent as way to store password encrypted, possibly based on what Jack Whitham prepared? https://www.jwhitham.org/2017/03/svn-password-store-using-ssh-agent.html https://github.com/jwhitham/safeu I

Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series

2019-12-16 Thread Paul Hammant
Subversion's missing piece is the patch-review system, agreed. Rietveld was 11.5 years ago (and Mondrian was 2 years before that - Perforce admittedly), so we have plenty of things to be inspired by. In the last year a "shelve" facility has been perfected for Subversion - https://cwiki.apache.org/

Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series

2019-12-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
wuzhouhui wrote on Tue, 17 Dec 2019 04:38 +00:00: > From: "Daniel Shahaf" > > To do this, I guess you'll want to write a script that automatically > > commits a patch series along with log messages (from `quilt header -e`)? > > If you do, please consider publishing it; it's not the first time this

Re: Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series

2019-12-16 Thread wuzhouhui
> -Original Messages- > From: "Daniel Shahaf" > Sent Time: 2019-12-17 09:29:22 (Tuesday) > To: wuzhouhui > Cc: subversion > Subject: Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series > > wuzhouhui wrote on Mon, 16 Dec 2019 06:57 +00:00: > > I do

Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series

2019-12-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
wuzhouhui wrote on Mon, 16 Dec 2019 06:57 +00:00: > I don't want to commit changes until I think the changes are good enough. > After > all, commit to a branch is also a commit. There is no technical requirement that commits to branches be as stable as commits to trunk; that's purely a social con

Re: Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series

2019-12-15 Thread wuzhouhui
> -Original Messages- > From: "Daniel Shahaf" > Sent Time: 2019-12-16 12:37:07 (Monday) > To: wuzhouhui > Cc: Subversion > Subject: Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series > > Nathan Hartman wrote on Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 22:06:03 -0500: &

Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series

2019-12-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 22:06:03 -0500: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 5:03 AM wuzhouhui > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Can Subversion support patch series, like quilt. So I can split a > > big change to small pieces before submit all of them, and po

Re: quilt-like feature, to support patch series

2019-12-15 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 5:03 AM wuzhouhui wrote: > Hi, > > Can Subversion support patch series, like quilt. So I can split a > big change to small pieces before submit all of them, and post-commit > review will be more easy. Not yet. (At least not that I know of.) Can you u

quilt-like feature, to support patch series

2019-12-15 Thread wuzhouhui
Hi, Can Subversion support patch series, like quilt. So I can split a big change to small pieces before submit all of them, and post-commit review will be more easy. Thanks.

Re: SVN version - confused about support

2019-12-08 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 7:03 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > The 1.9.x CHANGES file details what bug fixes (and other improvements) > there are in 1.9.9, 1.9.10, and 1.9.12. (1.9.8 and 1.9.11 were not > released.) Only you can make the judgment call if you prefer to stick > with 1.9.7 or want to use

Re: SVN version - confused about support

2019-12-08 Thread Nathan Hartman
upported" means that the branch continues to receive bug fixes, with these being delivered in a point release. "Unsupported" doesn't mean you can't use it anymore. It just means that there won't be new point releases in that line. There are two kinds of releases: Long Te

RE: SVN version - confused about support

2019-12-08 Thread Bo Berglund
> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:p...@hammant.org] > Sent: den 8 december 2019 11:26 > To: Bo Berglund > Subject: Re: SVN version - confused about support > > > First of all, get good at backups, and **practice** restores to another > machine. > That is another reall

RE: SVN version - confused about support

2019-12-08 Thread Bo Berglund
> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:p...@hammant.org] > Sent: den 8 december 2019 10:10 > To: Bo Berglund > Subject: Re: SVN version - confused about support > > > What is stopping you from getting fully up to date with Svn - client and > server? > Well, *how* can I

SVN version - confused about support

2019-12-08 Thread Bo Berglund
I am managing 2 svn servers, one on Windows 16 server (VisualSVN) and one on Ubuntu Server 18.04 LTS (Apache SVN) which is used as a mirror of the first using svnsync. On my Windows 7 dev laptop I installed the Collabnet command line svn back when I started using SVN. These are all running 1.9

Re: Is support officially over for subversion 1.9?

2019-08-06 Thread Branko Čibej
On 06.08.2019 16:08, ken edward wrote: > Hello, > > As I read the SVN LTS policy, it states that support ends 4 years > after the initial release. Since Subversion 1.9 was released on Aug 5, > 2015, does that now mean subversion 1.9 will not longer receive > security patches (

Is support officially over for subversion 1.9?

2019-08-06 Thread ken edward
Hello, As I read the SVN LTS policy, it states that support ends 4 years after the initial release. Since Subversion 1.9 was released on Aug 5, 2015, does that now mean subversion 1.9 will not longer receive security patches (now that it is Aug 6th)? Thank you, Ed

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-06 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:09:53AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 06.11.2018 10:20, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: > > Said all this, I would have simply amended this error message by a hint. > > „... check the URL is pointing to a SVN repository!“. > > ... and this hint implies that only the URL could

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-06 Thread Branko Čibej
On 06.11.2018 10:20, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: > For a DAV noob, this error message is IMHO indeed not very helpful. You need > to know that DAV is heavily based on XML. However, I have my doubts, that the > other message „does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol“ is much more helpful &

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-06 Thread Dr. Rolf Jansen
lained about the „misleading“ error message „Malformed XML in response,“ when pointing SVN to a plain web server, one which does not serve a SVN repository. For a DAV noob, this error message is IMHO indeed not very helpful. You need to know that DAV is heavily based on XML. However, I have my d

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote on Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:27 -0200: > FYI, RFC 2518 has been obsoleted since 11 years by RFC 4918, and the > relevant chapter moved to 10.1: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4918#section-10.1, and yes there is still > written "the DAV server MUST return the DAV header". Howeve

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Dr. Rolf Jansen
> Am 05.11.2018 um 21:57 schrieb Branko Čibej: > >>> Am 05.11.2018 um 20:43 schrieb Stefan Sperling: >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:21:20PM -0200, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >>>> and of course the GitHub server does support HTTP/DAV. > > N

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Dr. Rolf Jansen
> Am 05.11.2018 um 21:55 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia : > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 6:28 PM Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >> >>> Am 05.11.2018 um 20:43 schrieb Stefan Sperling : >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:21:20PM -0200, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >>>

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Branko Čibej
On 06.11.2018 00:28, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >> Am 05.11.2018 um 20:43 schrieb Stefan Sperling : >> >> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:21:20PM -0200, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >>> and of course the GitHub server does support HTTP/DAV. No it does not. It does not implement the

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 6:28 PM Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: > > > Am 05.11.2018 um 20:43 schrieb Stefan Sperling : > > > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:21:20PM -0200, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: > >> and of course the GitHub server does support HTTP/DAV. > > >

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Dr. Rolf Jansen
> Am 05.11.2018 um 20:43 schrieb Stefan Sperling : > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:21:20PM -0200, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: >> and of course the GitHub server does support HTTP/DAV. > >> # svn co https://github.com/cyclaero/ContentCGI.git/trunk ContentCGI >> svn: E

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Kris Deugau
ports system, and I built and installed subversion 1.11.0 from the upstream sources (thats’s yours) - see below. Needless to say that 1.10.3 does not show the issue below, and of course the GitHub server does support HTTP/DAV. If you check the list archives, you'll see that the t

Re: subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:21:20PM -0200, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote: > and of course the GitHub server does support HTTP/DAV. > # svn co https://github.com/cyclaero/ContentCGI.git/trunk ContentCGI > svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL > 'https://github.com/cyclae

subversion 1.11.0 on FreeBSD 11.2: ... does not support the HTTP/DAV protocol

2018-11-05 Thread Dr. Rolf Jansen
built and installed subversion 1.11.0 from the upstream sources (thats’s yours) - see below. Needless to say that 1.10.3 does not show the issue below, and of course the GitHub server does support HTTP/DAV. # fetch http://mirror.nbtelecom.com.br/apache/subversion/subversion-1.11.0.tar.bz2 # tar

Re: svn_load_dirs doesn't support filenames with @ in

2018-08-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:16 -0500: > On Aug 21, 2018, at 05:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > j...@beniston.com wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:40 +0100: > >> This patch adds @ to the end of the filename, to make it work. > > > > Thanks jon. Committed with tweaks in r1838539. > > It see

Re: svn_load_dirs doesn't support filenames with @ in

2018-08-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 21, 2018, at 05:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > j...@beniston.com wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:40 +0100: >> This patch adds @ to the end of the filename, to make it work. > > Thanks jon. Committed with tweaks in r1838539. It seems something like this was suggested before: https://svn.haxx

Re: svn_load_dirs doesn't support filenames with @ in

2018-08-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 08:39 -0400: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > j...@beniston.com wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:40 +0100: > > Your MUA seems to have mangled the patch. The easiest way to avoid this > > is to send patches as attachments named

Re: svn_load_dirs doesn't support filenames with @ in

2018-08-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > j...@beniston.com wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:40 +0100: >> This patch adds @ to the end of the filename, to make it work. > > Thanks jon. Committed with tweaks in r1838539. > >> --- svn_load_dirs.pl.in.old.txt 2018-08-21 09:33:02.557893300

Re: svn_load_dirs doesn't support filenames with @ in

2018-08-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
j...@beniston.com wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:40 +0100: > This patch adds @ to the end of the filename, to make it work. Thanks jon. Committed with tweaks in r1838539. > --- svn_load_dirs.pl.in.old.txt 2018-08-21 09:33:02.557893300 +0100 > > +++ svn_load_dirs.pl.in 2018-08-21 09:33:12.33900570

svn_load_dirs doesn't support filenames with @ in

2018-08-21 Thread jon
Hi, It seems svn_load_dirs.pl doesn't support filenames with @ in. You get an error such as: 's...@2x.png': a peg revision is not allowed here This patch adds @ to the end of the filename, to make it work. Cheers, Jon --- svn_load_dirs.pl.in.old.txt 2

Re: How to disable lz4 support when library is installed in system?

2018-04-17 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf writes: > In principle, if svn were built without lz4 (which isn't supposed to be > allowed by the stock configure) then it won't be able to read or produce > svndiff2 deltas, which are used on the wire and may be used in FSFS f8 > on-disk data. If committed r1829344 so that config

Re: How to disable lz4 support when library is installed in system?

2018-04-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
> > What should I pass to "configure" to PREVENT detection & usage of lz4 > > library installed in system? `--without-lz4' doesn't work. Yes, I can reproduce this. '--without-lz4' results in: configure: lz4 configuration via prefix checking for LZ4_compress_default in -llz4... yes which is not

Re: How to disable lz4 support when library is installed in system?

2018-04-13 Thread Jonathan Guy
--with-lz4=internal may be what you want. From what I can gather lz4 is the future so I would be surprised if you can prevent it’s usage. Jonathan > On 13 Apr 2018, at 16:13, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > > What should I pass to "configure" to PREVENT detection & usage of lz4 > library instal

How to disable lz4 support when library is installed in system?

2018-04-13 Thread Lev Serebryakov
What should I pass to "configure" to PREVENT detection & usage of lz4 library installed in system? `--without-lz4' doesn't work. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov

[bug] check-mime-type.pl: Windows Support

2017-01-07 Thread Matthias Buecher / Germany
Dear all, the hook-script check-mime-type.pl [A] doesn't work on the Windows platform as Windows does not support openfork. Additionally files/paths with spaces have to be put in quotes. Plus getting the temp dir should be left to the related Perl functions. [A] https://svn.apache.org/v

Re: Ending my RHEL backports support for Subversion

2016-09-18 Thread Paolo Di Pietro
Unfortunately, it's gotten too expensive for me to do. There are several factors. The big one is the updated requirements with each major release. Using more recent new technologies, like serf, and SQLite are understandable upstream changes, but it means integrating support for them for a

Ending my RHEL backports support for Subversion

2016-09-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
es, but it means integrating support for them for another set of RPM's for those components, and building up the support chains for tools like updated serf, multiplies the work and threatens other stable tools which might use serf. It's an old issue for many projects, but the return on inves

Does svn:externals Support --depth?

2015-12-01 Thread Jim
I'm trying to use svn:externals to include a directory from repo B in working copies of repo A. I can change only repo A. The external directory is huge, but I want only a few immediate children. Is there a way to get what this implies from svn:externals? % svn proplist -v . Properties on '.

Re: mod_dav_svn.so does no more support lock functions

2015-01-08 Thread Thierry LEPINE
Thank you Dave, I have tried with the binaries compiled from Apache Haus and it works fine. I'm also using the mod_authnz_sspi.so extension from my friend Ennio. First I tried the 64bits binaries but it failed, said it was not a valid win32 application ! Finally I decided to use the 32bits binar

Re: mod_dav_svn.so does no more support lock functions

2015-01-06 Thread Dave Huang
On 2015-01-06 10:57, Thierry LEPINE wrote: Not the official for sure but the most common download site http://sourceforge.net/projects/wampserver/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/win32svn/ http://www.wampserver.com/en/ says "Once WampServer is installed, you can manually add aditionals Apach

RE: mod_dav_svn.so does no more support lock functions

2015-01-06 Thread Thierry LEPINE
>> We are only using official binaries to avoid mistake, so with official >> ones it does not work , that is my status and the reason of my request! > > There are no official binaries; the only official release is the source > code. Where did you get your binaries? Did you get Apache and > Subver

Re: mod_dav_svn.so does no more support lock functions

2015-01-06 Thread Philip Martin
Thierry LEPINE writes: > We are only using official binaries to avoid mistake, so with official > ones it does not work , that is my status and the reason of my request! There are no official binaries; the only official release is the source code. Where did you get your binaries? Did you get A

RE: mod_dav_svn.so does no more support lock functions

2015-01-06 Thread Thierry LEPINE
> Locking does work in 1.8. This problem has only ever been reported by > people using Windows and it appears to be some binary incompatibity > between Apache and Subversion caused by the way they have been compiled. > Using different binaries has been reported to solve the problem. For sure, but

Re: mod_dav_svn.so does no more support lock functions

2015-01-06 Thread Philip Martin
Thierry LEPINE writes: > We have switched last week to > - subversion 1.8.11 server (Msi) over wamp 2.5 (apache server 2.4.9 - 32bits > ) on Windows Server 2012 64bits > The error-log on the apache server contains > [Tue Jan 06 14:34:39.169863 2015] [dav:error] [pid 3760:tid 1164] [client >

mod_dav_svn.so does no more support lock functions

2015-01-06 Thread Thierry LEPINE
What we had from 2006 : - subversion 1.3.0 server (Msi) over apache web serveur 2.0.55 on Windows SBS 2003 32bits - Tortoise SVN 1.8.x clients connected to subversion on https We could do every svn operation and also get / release lock, commit with lock. We have switched last week to - subver

Does subversion swig binding support for python 3 now?

2014-11-30 Thread Yonggang Luo
I am looking forward to it. -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo

Support

2014-06-22 Thread Jacky wong
连接SQL Server DBconnect.Provider = "SQLOLEDB.1" DBconnect.ConnectionString = "DATABASE= ;SERVER= ;UID= ;PWD= ;" 或者可以使用 DBconnect.Open "SERVER" , "USERID" , "PASSWORD" DBConnect.Open/

Support

2014-06-05 Thread Jacky wong
# Non-members may check out a read-only working copy anonymously over HTTP. svn checkout http://svnbook.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ svnbook-read-only

RE: svn list support for listing directory entries only

2014-05-05 Thread Bert Huijben
compatibility work to support older servers was harder than I anticipated. But a lot of the missing ground work that made it that difficult back then is now implemented) I’m not sure which Subversion client you use for your ‘svn ls’, but recently I compared an 1.6 an 1.8 client over http:// and

Re: svn list support for listing directory entries only

2014-05-05 Thread Dan Ellis
ng copies, "depth=dirs" probably doesn't make much sense. > Once you've defined what "depth=dirs" means for all the commands that support depth, you're about 10% done ... you'd have to review the implementation for every use of the depth parameter and ei

Re: svn list support for listing directory entries only

2014-05-04 Thread Branko Čibej
aces, not just in "svn list"; whatever enhancement you come up with must at least fit the other uses. Depth was invented to describe sparse working copies, and was only later adapted to other commands. For sparse working copies, "depth=dirs" probably doesn't make much sense. On

Re: svn list support for listing directory entries only

2014-05-03 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 3, 2014, at 22:32, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On May 3, 2014, at 21:25, Dan Ellis wrote: > >> Its really a performance concern. We need to do this fairly regularly on a >> large repository (over a WAN I might add) and asking the server for all >> files and directories when we really only ne

Re: svn list support for listing directory entries only

2014-05-03 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 3, 2014, at 21:25, Dan Ellis wrote: > Its really a performance concern. We need to do this fairly regularly on a > large repository (over a WAN I might add) and asking the server for all files > and directories when we really only need a directory listing is really a huge > time sink (

Re: svn list support for listing directory entries only

2014-05-03 Thread Dan Ellis
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 3, 2014, at 20:13, Dan Ellis wrote: > > > The svn command line list command currently accepts --depth arguments of > files, infinity, and immediates (and empty, but that is really a no-op). > I'm in need of being able to list directo

Re: svn list support for listing directory entries only

2014-05-03 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 3, 2014, at 20:13, Dan Ellis wrote: > The svn command line list command currently accepts --depth arguments of > files, infinity, and immediates (and empty, but that is really a no-op). I'm > in need of being able to list directory entries only in a repository, but I'm > not sure there

svn list support for listing directory entries only

2014-05-03 Thread Dan Ellis
Hi, The svn command line list command currently accepts --depth arguments of files, infinity, and immediates (and empty, but that is really a no-op). I'm in need of being able to list directory entries only in a repository, but I'm not sure there is any good way to accomplish that as-is. I've se

RE: Windows Server 2008 Support

2014-02-21 Thread hshe
Dear Stefan, Thank you for your quick and detailed explanations. I got it. And we don't need professional support. Best Regards She Hanbing (Eric She)   ABeam Global Development Centre 4F, Building.23,498# GuoShouJing Rd. Pudong,Shanghai, 2

Re: Windows Server 2008 Support

2014-02-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
er 2003, before upgrade, we have some > concerns and would like to consult with you: > > 1. Does SVN support Windows 2008 R2 (x86)? > 2. If no, which version can support it? And how to upgrade it to the > Support-Version? > 3. If there is a support period for

Windows Server 2008 Support

2014-02-21 Thread hshe
. Does SVN support Windows 2008 R2 (x86)? 2. If no, which version can support it? And how to upgrade it to the Support-Version? 3. If there is a support period for SVN in Windows 2003 (x86)? If yes, when is the support end date? 4. If there is a support period for SVN "Su

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Philip Martin
Adam Daughterson writes: > On 12/05/2013 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Adam Daughterson >> wrote: >>> Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not >>> Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a Windows >>>

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread David Kelly
On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Adam Daughterson wrote: > On 12/05/2013 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Adam Daughterson >> wrote: >>> Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not >>> Windows) work as well. I've only found operations

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Thorsten Schöning
{st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 > close(3)= 0 > write(2, "svn: E200030: sqlite[S22]: large"..., 58svn: E200030: > sqlite[S22]: large file support is disabled > ) = 58 You could try to run Process Monitor during the access of your te

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Adam Daughterson wrote: > >>> Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not >>> Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a >>> Windows >>> share to not work. >> >> This is starting to sound like one of those "if i

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Adam Daughterson
On 12/05/2013 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Adam Daughterson wrote: Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a Windows share to not work. This is starting to soun

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Adam Daughterson wrote: > > Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not > Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a Windows > share to not work. This is starting to sound like one of those "if it hurts, don't

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Adam Daughterson
0030: sqlite[S22]: large"..., 58svn: E200030: sqlite[S22]: large file support is disabled ) = 58 That's odd. The open, fstat64, close all succeed so what triggered the error? The message corresponds to SQLITE_NOLFS in the sqlite amalgamation, so I guess it's the code in findInodeIn

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Philip Martin
/wc.db", > {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 > open("/mnt/cns/Users/adaughterson/tmp/Tools/.svn/wc.db", > O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC, 0644) = 3 > fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 > close(3) = 0 &

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Dave Huang
On 2013-12-05 1:16 AM, David Kelly wrote: Repeat adding -s to ls. I think that will list the position of EOF. I think you have a sparse file which physically occupies 119k but has massive holes which have yet to be assigned disk blocks. It's the other way around-- ls -l shows the logical lengt

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Philip Martin
yThing/trunk myThing > svn: E200030: sqlite[S22]: large file support is disabled > > I've verified that I can perform this same operation on a Linux samba share > with the new clients, and nothing has changed on the Windows side of things. > > The really interesting part

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-04 Thread David Kelly
On Dec 4, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Adam Daughterson wrote: > The really interesting part is that the db file is only 119k, so that's nice > and weird... > > me@here:myThing$ ls -alh .svn > total 144K > drwxr-xr-x 4 adaughterson adaughterson 4.0K 2013-12-02 15:42 . > drwxr-xr-x 9 adaughterson adaug

SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-04 Thread Adam Daughterson
large file support is disabled I've verified that I can perform this same operation on a Linux samba share with the new clients, and nothing has changed on the Windows side of things. The really interesting part is that the db file is only 119k, so that's nice and weird... me@here:myThin

RE: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-03 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org] > Sent: zaterdag 2 november 2013 23:58 > To: d...@sent.com; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6 > > On 11/2/13 10:48 AM, d...@sent.c

Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-02 Thread Ben Reser
On 11/2/13 10:48 AM, d...@sent.com wrote: > reading @ > > @ > > http://www.wandisco.com/svnforum/threads/54273-svn-error-when-checkout-from-ipv6-url > > IPv6 support is (?) in svn v>1.8 That post is actually not particularly helpful. It looks like there

Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-02 Thread darx
> suggest you take that question to the APR developers; it's > d...@apr.apache.org. done, @ http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40apr.apache.org/msg25430.html thx!

Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-02 Thread darx
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 01:09 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > Also, which version of APR you're using (and how it was compiled) is > fairly important. You can determine the former by running the command > > svn --version --verbose > > with the 1.8.x client, or > > apr-1-config --version > > a

Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.11.2013 21:06, d...@sent.com wrote: > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: >> I believe support for IPv6 in the SVN client is based solely on how the >> APR library was compiled. It has to have IPv6 support compiled in as it >> does the TCP connections

Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.11.2013 20:00, Dave Huang wrote: > On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:48, d...@sent.com wrote: > >> With my resolvers set to IPv6 >> >> cat /etc/resolv.conf >> nameserver 2600:3c01::2 >> nameserver 2600:3c01::3 >> options rotate >> in short, 'everything' IPv6 w

Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-02 Thread darx
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > I believe support for IPv6 in the SVN client is based solely on how the > APR library was compiled. It has to have IPv6 support compiled in as it > does the TCP connections etc. It appears to be a problem with SVN's ability t

Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-02 Thread Dave Huang
On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:48, d...@sent.com wrote: > With my resolvers set to IPv6 > > cat /etc/resolv.conf > nameserver 2600:3c01::2 > nameserver 2600:3c01::3 > options rotate > in short, 'everything' IPv6 works here ... except for subversion, FWIW

Re: IPv6 URL support in SVN? v1.8.4 works with IPv4, not with IPv6

2013-11-02 Thread Mark Phippard
I believe support for IPv6 in the SVN client is based solely on how the APR library was compiled. It has to have IPv6 support compiled in as it does the TCP connections etc. > On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:48 PM, d...@sent.com wrote: > > With my resolvers set to IPv6 > >cat /

  1   2   3   >