RE: Bug (svn 1.7.1) with reintegrate merge and deleted symbolic links

2012-02-17 Thread christian.asmussen
Thank you very much Stefan! Will try out the patch. Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notif

Re: Bug (svn 1.7.1) with reintegrate merge and deleted symbolic links

2012-02-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:22PM +0100, christian.asmus...@ubs.com wrote: > Dear *, > > I was happy to see subversion 1.7.3 was release and that many bugs were > fixed. > > This bug did not get fixed though > (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4052) and that > would have made

RE: Bug (svn 1.7.1) with reintegrate merge and deleted symbolic links

2012-02-14 Thread christian.asmussen
Dear *, I was happy to see subversion 1.7.3 was release and that many bugs were fixed. This bug did not get fixed though (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4052) and that would have made me even happier J Has anyone had time to look into this? Regards Christian V

Re: SVN 1.7.1

2011-12-04 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:19 AM, i_maliavko wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using it since official release. And decision to using it was my big > fail. Becase: > 1. commit list makes about 10 minutes time after time; > 2. first update in day last over 15 minutes; Hard to say whether this is a regression, wi

Re: SVN 1.7.1

2011-12-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:19 AM, i_maliavko wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using it since official release. And decision to using it was my big > fail. Becase: > 1. commit list makes about 10 minutes time after time; > 2. first update in day last over 15 minutes; > > I'm working on big project (over 100 000

SVN 1.7.1

2011-12-04 Thread i_maliavko
Hi. I'm using it since official release. And decision to using it was my big fail. Becase: 1. commit list makes about 10 minutes time after time; 2. first update in day last over 15 minutes; I'm working on big project (over 100 000 files) and waste about an hour on waiting SVN operations. And

Re: TortoiseSVN-1.7.1.22161-x64-svn-1.7.1.msi has a bug: cannot upward to the super folder in browser!

2011-11-30 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 1, 2011, at 01:03, zuxiong lin wrote: > TortoiseSVN-1.7.1.22161-x64-svn-1.7.1.msi has a bug: cannot upward to the > super folder in browser! > Env: Win7 x64 Not being a TortoiseSVN or Windows user I don't know what this means, but TortoiseSVN has its own mailing list whi

TortoiseSVN-1.7.1.22161-x64-svn-1.7.1.msi has a bug: cannot upward to the super folder in browser!

2011-11-30 Thread zuxiong lin
TortoiseSVN-1.7.1.22161-x64-svn-1.7.1.msi has a bug: cannot upward to the super folder in browser! Env: Win7 x64 linzuxiong.

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:38:44PM +0100, Vyacheslav Zholudev wrote: >> I guess "badness" can happen only when accessing repositories locally (not >> via svn:// or http(s)://) with patched and not patched SVN. >> But usually only one version

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:38:44PM +0100, Vyacheslav Zholudev wrote: > I guess "badness" can happen only when accessing repositories locally (not > via svn:// or http(s)://) with patched and not patched SVN. > But usually only one version of SVN is installed on the server side, so that > should

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
ck. Vyacheslav On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > To clarify, the issues I was concerned about weren't with tree changes > (the level of the code dealing with content reps isn't aware of those), > but with creating/accessing a single repository sometimes via &g

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
To clarify, the issues I was concerned about weren't with tree changes (the level of the code dealing with content reps isn't aware of those), but with creating/accessing a single repository sometimes via unmodified svn 1.7.1 libraries and sometimes via forward-delta-patched libraries.

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
stores >>>>>> the youngest strings in "fulltext" form, and older strings as "delta"s >>>>>> against them (unless the delta would save no space compared to the >>>>>> fulltext). >>>>>> " >>>>&

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
e delta would save no space compared to the > >>>> fulltext). > >>>> " > >>>> My own experiments with SVN 1.4 code confirm that. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Repositories created with o

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
ta would save no space compared to the >>>> fulltext). >>>> " >>>> My own experiments with SVN 1.4 code confirm that. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Repositories created with or 'svnadmin >>>>&g

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
and newer reverse this for new revisions of files > >>> (while making sure not to introduce a dependency loop in the direction > >>> of deltas). > >>> > >>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.6#bdb-forward-deltas > >>> > >

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
with or 'svnadmin >>> upgrade'd by 1.6 and newer reverse this for new revisions of files >>> (while making sure not to introduce a dependency loop in the direction >>> of deltas). >>> >>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.6#b

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
not to introduce a dependency loop in the direction > > of deltas). > > > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.6#bdb-forward-deltas > > > > On Friday, November 25, 2011 1:08 AM, "Vyacheslav Zholudev" > > wrote: > >> Hi, >

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-25 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
e making sure not to introduce a dependency loop in the direction > of deltas). > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.6#bdb-forward-deltas > > On Friday, November 25, 2011 1:08 AM, "Vyacheslav Zholudev" > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ho

Re: BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
as). http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.6#bdb-forward-deltas On Friday, November 25, 2011 1:08 AM, "Vyacheslav Zholudev" wrote: > Hi, > > how does SVN 1.7.1 store fulltext and deltas in the BDB backend? From some > time ago I remember that previous versions

BDB backend in SVN 1.7.1

2011-11-24 Thread Vyacheslav Zholudev
Hi, how does SVN 1.7.1 store fulltext and deltas in the BDB backend? From some time ago I remember that previous versions of SVN stored "almost" always a HEAD revision as fulltext, and others as reverse deltas.(except the case when a delta is bigger that fulltext) Was this behavior

RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-16 Thread Cooke, Mark
[please do not top-post on this list] > -Original Message- > From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 4:40 PM > To: Waseem Shahzad > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server > &

RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-16 Thread Waseem Shahzad
Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server -Original Message- From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 4:40 PM To: Waseem Shahzad Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 18:21, Waseem Shahzad

RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-16 Thread Jeegnesh Sheth
-Original Message- From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 4:40 PM To: Waseem Shahzad Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 18:21, Waseem Shahzad wrote: > I need to downl

Re: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-16 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 18:21, Waseem Shahzad wrote: > I need to download SVN 1.7.1 Server for windows. Any link. > http://www.visualsvn.com/downloads/ -- Ivan Zhakov

Re: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-14 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Mark Phippard, am Montag, 14. November 2011 um 16:18 schrieben Sie: > What dependencies does SCMBug place on the process? I thought they just > used a post-commit hook to look at the commit messages using svnlook? Why > would that be difficult to upgrade? SVN is usually very good at >

Re: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-14 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag Mark Phippard, > am Montag, 14. November 2011 um 15:47 schrieben Sie: > > > If you were using SVN Edge, upgrading for new releases and security fixes > > becomes as simple as clicking a button in the web browser. > > That's the

Re: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-14 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Mark Phippard, am Montag, 14. November 2011 um 15:47 schrieben Sie: > If you were using SVN Edge, upgrading for new releases and security fixes > becomes as simple as clicking a button in the web browser. That's the theory, in practice I have SCMBug running which won't get updated as si

RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-14 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Waseem Shahzad [mailto:waseem.shah...@curemd.com] > Sent: 14 November 2011 14:36 > To: Jeegnesh Sheth; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server > > Actually I don't want to go for Subversion e

Re: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-14 Thread Mark Phippard
ent:* Monday, November 14, 2011 9:31 AM > *To:* Waseem Shahzad; users@subversion.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server > > ** ** > > Search for subversion edge on google. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Thank You > > Jigi > >

RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-14 Thread Waseem Shahzad
1.7.1 http://www.collab.net/downloads/subversion/ Cheers From: Jeegnesh Sheth [mailto:jsh...@src-solutions.com] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:31 AM To: Waseem Shahzad; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server Search for subversion edge on g

RE: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-14 Thread Jeegnesh Sheth
Search for subversion edge on google. Thank You Jigi From: Waseem Shahzad [mailto:waseem.shah...@curemd.com] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:21 AM To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server I need to download SVN 1.7.1 Server for windows. Any

Downloading Link for SVN 1.7.1 Server

2011-11-14 Thread Waseem Shahzad
I need to download SVN 1.7.1 Server for windows. Any link. Cheers,

RE: Bug (svn 1.7.1) with reintegrate merge and deleted symbolic links

2011-11-09 Thread christian.asmussen
Issue created http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4052 -Original Message- From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] Sent: 09 November 2011 17:57 To: Asmussen, Christian Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Bug (svn 1.7.1) with reintegrate merge and deleted

Re: Bug (svn 1.7.1) with reintegrate merge and deleted symbolic links

2011-11-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 04:13:56PM +0100, christian.asmus...@ubs.com wrote: > Dear "Users", > > > > It seems that on svn 1.7.1 deleted symbolic links on a branch cause a > tree conflict when a -reintegrate merge is done back to trunk. > > The same merge don

Bug (svn 1.7.1) with reintegrate merge and deleted symbolic links

2011-11-09 Thread christian.asmussen
Dear "Users", It seems that on svn 1.7.1 deleted symbolic links on a branch cause a tree conflict when a -reintegrate merge is done back to trunk. The same merge done with svn 1.6.17 smoothly passes as a normal deletion. See below a simple "script"

Re: svn 1.7.1 for Windows/64bit - cannot perform svn update

2011-11-03 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 03.11.2011 12:31, schrieb Tomáš Klinkovský: My server is also very old: $ svn --version svn, version 1.0.9 (r11378) compiled Oct 14 2004, 10:04:20 Hehe, that's actually a proof that the SVN team's been doing a pretty good job maintaining compatibility. Seven years without a glitch, it see

Re: svn 1.7.1 for Windows/64bit - cannot perform svn update

2011-11-03 Thread Philip Martin
Tomáš Klinkovský writes: > My server is also very old: > > $ svn --version > svn, version 1.0.9 (r11378) > compiled Oct 14 2004, 10:04:20 > > But I don't access it through Apache, I have the Subversion daemon > running and I use the "svn:" protocol. > > Can I provide any other help? I can

Re: svn 1.7.1 for Windows/64bit - cannot perform svn update

2011-11-03 Thread Tomáš Klinkovský
Philip Martin wrote: Tomáš Klinkovský writes: starting from svn 1.7 I cannot make "svn update" anymore on Windows 7, 64bit. C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>svn --version svn, version 1.7.1-SlikSvn-1.7.1-X64 (SlikSvn/1.7.1) X64 compiled Oct 26 2011, 14:18:24 C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>

Re: svn 1.7.1 for Windows/64bit - cannot perform svn update

2011-11-03 Thread Philip Martin
Tomáš Klinkovský writes: > starting from svn 1.7 I cannot make "svn update" anymore on Windows 7, > 64bit. > > C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>svn --version > svn, version 1.7.1-SlikSvn-1.7.1-X64 (SlikSvn/1.7.1) X64 > compiled Oct 26 2011, 14:18:24 > > C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>svn update >

svn 1.7.1 for Windows/64bit - cannot perform svn update

2011-11-03 Thread Tomáš Klinkovský
Hello, starting from svn 1.7 I cannot make "svn update" anymore on Windows 7, 64bit. C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>svn --version svn, version 1.7.1-SlikSvn-1.7.1-X64 (SlikSvn/1.7.1) X64 compiled Oct 26 2011, 14:18:24 C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>svn update Updating '.': svn: E235000: I