Re: Maintaining a SVN 1.7 mirror without network access

2023-06-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 2:54 AM Colcord, Scott via users wrote: > > Thanks to all for their insights. > > On Saturday, June 3, 2023 2:41 PM, Andreas Stieger wrote: > > No you cannot do it in the way you described, and your approach is > > incorrect. Not for svn, but IT. > > Just to be clear, the s

RE: Maintaining a SVN 1.7 mirror without network access

2023-06-07 Thread Colcord, Scott via users
Thanks to all for their insights. On Saturday, June 3, 2023 2:41 PM, Andreas Stieger wrote: > No you cannot do it in the way you described, and your approach is incorrect. > Not for svn, but IT. Just to be clear, the status quo was not my idea; I'm just trying to work with it. > For subversion

Re: Maintaining a SVN 1.7 mirror without network access

2023-06-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:33 AM Colcord, Scott via users wrote: > > I have a Subversion 1.7 repo. I need to periodically mirror it to a location > that does not have direct net access (I can transfer a .dump file to it). > > > > One catch is that the mirror needs to be able to receive one diverge

Re: Maintaining a SVN 1.7 mirror without network access

2023-06-03 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:41 PM Andreas Stieger wrote: > Hello, > > On 2023-06-03 00:25, Colcord, Scott via users wrote: > > > > [...] Subversion 1.7 [...] periodically mirror it to a location that > > does not have direct net access > > [...] > > > > the mirror needs to be able to receive one div

Re: Maintaining a SVN 1.7 mirror without network access

2023-06-03 Thread Andreas Stieger
Hello, On 2023-06-03 00:25, Colcord, Scott via users wrote: [...] Subversion 1.7 [...] periodically mirror it to a location that does not have direct net access [...] the mirror needs to be able to receive one divergent commit after the load (this commit alters svn:externals locations to be ap

Maintaining a SVN 1.7 mirror without network access

2023-06-02 Thread Colcord, Scott via users
I have a Subversion 1.7 repo. I need to periodically mirror it to a location that does not have direct net access (I can transfer a .dump file to it). One catch is that the mirror needs to be able to receive one divergent commit after the load (this commit alters svn:externals locations to be a

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-10 Thread Ben Reser
On 12/10/13 5:28 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > The correct English term is "reclaim". We should review our release notes more > diligently. :) Agreed. Fixed in r1549892.

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 10.12.2013 14:15, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2013-12-10 12:12:06 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:28:52AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> First, "svn help cleanup" currently says: >>> >>> cleanup: Recursively clean up the working copy, removing locks, resuming >>> u

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-10 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-12-10 12:12:06 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:28:52AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > First, "svn help cleanup" currently says: > > > > cleanup: Recursively clean up the working copy, removing locks, resuming > > unfinished operations, etc. > > > > I suggest

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:28:52AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > First, "svn help cleanup" currently says: > > cleanup: Recursively clean up the working copy, removing locks, resuming > unfinished operations, etc. > > I suggest to change it to something like: > > cleanup: Recursively clean up

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-12-10 01:00:32 +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 9 December 2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100: > >> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge > >> over time (several times the expected size). A "svn clea

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-12-09 17:37:28 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:30:21PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge > > over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves > > the problem, but > > 1. this is

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-12-09 19:55:54 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100: > > I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge > > over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves > > the problem, but > > 1. this isn't d

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 10 December 2013 01:32, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ivan Zhakov wrote on Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:00:32 +0400: >> On 9 December 2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100: >> >> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get hug

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:00:32 +0400: > On 9 December 2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100: > >> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge > >> over time (several times the expected size). A

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 9 December 2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100: >> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge >> over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves >> the problem, but >> 1. this isn't document

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100: > I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge > over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves > the problem, but > 1. this isn't documented (I'm wondering how many users know that); It's doc

Re: size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:30:21PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge > over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves > the problem, but > 1. this isn't documented (I'm wondering how many users know that); > 2. t

size of .svn/pristine directory (svn 1.7.x)

2013-12-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves the problem, but 1. this isn't documented (I'm wondering how many users know that); 2. this isn't automatic. About (2), svn could warn the user when a cleanup cou

Re: SVN 1.7 - can delete external files

2013-04-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:51:30AM +0300, Florin Avram wrote: > Hi, > > Well, I don't know how often this situation can be seen, so it is up > to you (SVN developers) to decide what to do (I just signaled the > issue). I will focus on bugs I consider more important then :) So unless someone else

Re: SVN 1.7 - can delete external files

2013-04-08 Thread Florin Avram
that you can delete external files with SVN 1.7, which should not be allowed. Below are some test I've done with SVN 1.6 and SVN 1.7 over external files and directories. *I.**external file* *1.**SVN 1.6* - neither "svn delete external.txt" or "svn delete --keep-local external

Re: SVN 1.7 - can delete external files

2013-04-08 Thread Daniel Shahaf
I found that you can delete external files with SVN 1.7, which >>> should not be allowed. Below are some test I've done with SVN 1.6 >>> and SVN 1.7 over external files and directories. >>> >>> *I.**external file* >>> *1.**SVN 1.6* - neither "

Re: SVN 1.7 - can delete external files

2013-04-07 Thread Florin Avram
i, I found that you can delete external files with SVN 1.7, which should not be allowed. Below are some test I've done with SVN 1.6 and SVN 1.7 over external files and directories. *I.**external file* *1.**SVN 1.6* - neither "svn delete external.txt" or "svn delete --keep-local

Re: SVN 1.7 - can delete external files

2013-04-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:12:10PM +0300, Syncro SVN Client Support wrote: > Hi, > > I found that you can delete external files with SVN 1.7, which > should not be allowed. Below are some test I've done with SVN 1.6 > and SVN 1.7 over external files and directories. > >

SVN 1.7 - can delete external files

2013-04-05 Thread Syncro SVN Client Support
Hi, I found that you can delete external files with SVN 1.7, which should not be allowed. Below are some test I've done with SVN 1.6 and SVN 1.7 over external files and directories. *I.**external file* *1.**SVN 1.6* - neither "svn delete external.txt" or "svn

RE: Svn 1.7 merge info property

2012-08-31 Thread Bob Archer
> I wanted to mute the svn merge info property on my subversion server > > Is there such a way > > We don't need the info currently and when merging it is causing a huge log > with all changes to property being recorded and what we need is only the > code merge So you are always specifying your

Re: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals

2012-08-30 Thread Philip Martin
"Boe, Aasmund" writes: > I tested with the following setup: > Server: VisualSVN Server 2.5.6 (Apache subversion 1.7.6) > Client: TortoiseSVN 1.7.8 > TortoiseSvn 1.6.x > Using this setup I did not get error W160016 with either client versions. > > I am still puzzled about the fact that sin

RE: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals

2012-08-30 Thread Boe, Aasmund
0 MVA -Original Message- From: Boe, Aasmund Sent: 28. august 2012 12:03 To: Philip Martin Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals > W160016 is the server-side error SVN_ERR_FS_NOT_DIRECTORY so it looks as > if the server m

Re: Svn 1.7 merge info property

2012-08-29 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 29.08.2012 00:32, schrieb Rp0013: I wanted to mute the svn merge info property on my subversion server Is there such a way You could set up a pre-commit hook that makes sure that this property isn't touched in commits. We don't need the info currently and when merging it is causing a h

Svn 1.7 merge info property

2012-08-28 Thread Rp0013
Hi I wanted to mute the svn merge info property on my subversion server Is there such a way We don't need the info currently and when merging it is causing a huge log with all changes to property being recorded and what we need is only the code merge Regards, Rajesh Sent from my iPhone

Re: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals

2012-08-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
en 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway. Org. > > NO 980499480 MVA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Boe, Aasmund > > Sent: 24. juli 2012 08:53 > > To: 'users@subversion.apache.org' > > Subject: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file ext

RE: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals

2012-08-28 Thread Boe, Aasmund
n 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway. Org. NO 980499480 MVA -Original Message- From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of Philip Martin Sent: 28. august 2012 11:56 To: Boe, Aasmund Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of s

Re: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals

2012-08-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Sent: 24. juli 2012 08:53 > To: 'users@subversion.apache.org' > Subject: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals > > Using subversion 1.7(.5), updating a working copy that has single file > svn:externals results in an error, even if the update does inde

Re: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals

2012-08-28 Thread Philip Martin
"Boe, Aasmund" writes: > For reference, the server side uses a very old version (1.1.4 > [r13838]), but from what I know externals is a client "feature" so an > old server should not be a problem. Besides, this workes well using > subversion 1.6.x (client). > > This is the scenario I observe: > >

RE: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals

2012-08-27 Thread Boe, Aasmund
ds, Åsmund B. BØ Texas Instruments Norway AS, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway. Org. NO 980499480 MVA -Original Message- From: Boe, Aasmund Sent: 24. juli 2012 08:53 To: 'users@subversion.apache.org' Subject: svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externa

Re: Update to psvn.el for SVN 1.7

2012-08-17 Thread Andre Colomb
Daniel Shahaf wrote on 2012-08-17 17:04 > Andre Colomb wrote on Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 14:38:43 +0200: >> Hi Subversion developers! >> > > Please use the dev@ list to reach the developers (including for patch > submissions). See http://subversion.apache.org/patches . Thanks! Thank you for the he

Re: Update to psvn.el for SVN 1.7

2012-08-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
n.el does > not properly support working copies in SVN 1.7 format. It expects > each directory to have a .svn subdirectory, which is no longer the > case. > > Googling around, I found a small patch [1], courtesy of Koji > Nakamaru (CC'ed) that makes psvn.el work with Su

Update to psvn.el for SVN 1.7

2012-08-17 Thread Andre Colomb
Hi Subversion developers! The current HEAD version of the Emacs SVN status mode, psvn.el does not properly support working copies in SVN 1.7 format. It expects each directory to have a .svn subdirectory, which is no longer the case. Googling around, I found a small patch [1], courtesy of

svn 1.7 client issues error on update of single file externals

2012-07-23 Thread Boe, Aasmund
Using subversion 1.7(.5), updating a working copy that has single file svn:externals results in an error, even if the update does indeed work. Bug, or am I doing something wrong? Details posted on stackoverflow.com (before I was aware of this mailing list): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1161

Re: svn 1.7 - switching from file to directory external

2012-05-28 Thread Sofie De Cooman
2012/5/28 Philip Martin : > Philip Martin writes: > >>> 2. now locally exclude subdirectory b from update (svn update b >>> --set-depth=exclude), which removes versioned subdirectory b from the >>> local working copy >>> 3. change the local svn:externals property set on a to become a >>> directory

Re: svn 1.7 - switching from file to directory external

2012-05-28 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: >> 2. now locally exclude subdirectory b from update (svn update b >> --set-depth=exclude), which removes versioned subdirectory b from the >> local working copy >> 3. change the local svn:externals property set on a to become a >> directory external: >> /b b > > Here you ar

Re: svn 1.7 - switching from file to directory external

2012-05-28 Thread Philip Martin
Sofie De Cooman writes: > 1. checkout directory a recursively and locally apply an svn:externals > property on it: > /b/test.txt b/test.txt Here you are setting svn:externals on the parent of the versioned directory b that puts an external node inside b. It's not clear that we ever intended to

svn 1.7 - switching from file to directory external

2012-05-28 Thread Sofie De Cooman
Hi, After upgrading my svn client from 1.6 to 1.7 I encountered the following: Suppose an svn repository has the following layout a/b b/test.txt (top directories a and b, a has a subdirectory b, top directory b contains a file test.txt) Now try the following steps: 1. checkout directory a r

Re: Planned release date for mod_dav_svn compile error fix (SVN 1.7/Apache 2.4)

2012-05-15 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 15.05.12 09:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > 1.7.5 will include this fix. That's good news, thanks. -Ralph

Re: Planned release date for mod_dav_svn compile error fix (SVN 1.7/Apache 2.4)

2012-05-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
1.7.5 will include this fix. Current plan is to announce it as GA on Thursday. >From CHANGES: - Server-side bugfixes: * mod_dav_svn: support compiling/running under httpd-2.4 (r1232267) * mod_dav_svn: forbid BDB repositories under httpd's event MPM (issue #4157) Michael Ben-David wrot

Re: Planned release date for mod_dav_svn compile error fix (SVN 1.7/Apache 2.4)

2012-05-14 Thread Michael Ben-David
+1 for this. I just ran into it with: --without-berkeley-db On Friday, 20 April 2012 02:21:05 UTC-4, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > We're working in this (mostly Philip). It's possible that 1.7.5 will > allow compiling and running against httpd-2.4, so long as the 'event' > MPM and BDB-backed reposito

Re: Planned release date for mod_dav_svn compile error fix (SVN 1.7/Apache 2.4)

2012-04-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
We're working in this (mostly Philip). It's possible that 1.7.5 will allow compiling and running against httpd-2.4, so long as the 'event' MPM and BDB-backed repositories aren't used at the same time (see issue #4157). The underlying problem of making bdb/event act nicely is outstanding Ralph S

Planned release date for mod_dav_svn compile error fix (SVN 1.7/Apache 2.4)

2012-04-19 Thread Ralph Seichter
Hi list, in February, Mario Brandt started a thread about a compile error against Apache 2.4.x (see http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-02/0486.shtml). subversion/mod_dav_svn/util.c: In function 'dav_svn__log_err': subversion/mod_dav_svn/util.c:630:20: error: 'dav_error' has no member named 'sav

AW: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-29 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Martin, > Von: Philip Martin > Johan Corveleyn writes: > > [Missing or broken pristines] > > Is this a situation from which svn could ultimately become self-healing? > > I suppose it might get fixed as a side-effect of somebody implementing > "optional pristine" but generally wq items are no

RE: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 28 maart 2012 17:25 > To: Daniel Shahaf > Cc: Bert Huijben; Philip Martin; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file > > O

Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
.. just interesting :-)): [[[ C:\WC>echo test >> build.properties C:\WC>svn-1.7 st M build.properties C:\WC>svn-1.7 up --set-depth exclude build.properties Dbuild.properties C:\WC>svn-1.7 st ? build.properties C:\WC>svn-1.7 up build.properties Updating '

Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 16:38:41 +0200: > Thanks both for your help. Maybe this will help others running in the > same situation ... Do you know what cause the pristine to disappear in the first place?

Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] >> Sent: woensdag 28 maart 2012 15:47 >> To: Philip Martin >> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: sv

RE: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 28 maart 2012 15:47 > To: Philip Martin > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at

Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Philip Martin
Johan Corveleyn writes: > Thanks for your help, Philip. > > $ sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "select * from work_queue" > 1|(file-install trunk/rootdir/the/file/with/missing/pristine.java 1 0 1 1) > >> These may show something: >> >>  sqlite3 wc/.svn/wc.db "select * from nodes where local_relpath = >> '/the

Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
is without having to throw away my entire >>> working copy. So far I'm unsuccessful. Any help is appreciated. >>> >>> svn-1.7 is SlikSVN 1.7.4 (On Windows 7, 64bit): >>> [[[ >>> C:\Work\WC-root>svn-1.7 update -r0 the\file\with\missing\pristine.java

Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
uccessful. Any help is appreciated. >> >> svn-1.7 is SlikSVN 1.7.4 (On Windows 7, 64bit): >> [[[ >> C:\Work\WC-root>svn-1.7 update -r0 the\file\with\missing\pristine.java >> svn: E155037: Previous operation has not finished; run 'cleanup' if it >> was inte

Re: svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Philip Martin
Johan Corveleyn writes: > For some reason, I lost a pristine file [*] in a 1.7 working copy. I'm > trying to recover from this without having to throw away my entire > working copy. So far I'm unsuccessful. Any help is appreciated. > > svn-1.7 is SlikSVN 1.7.4 (On Win

svn 1.7: how to recover from a lost pristine file

2012-03-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
For some reason, I lost a pristine file [*] in a 1.7 working copy. I'm trying to recover from this without having to throw away my entire working copy. So far I'm unsuccessful. Any help is appreciated. svn-1.7 is SlikSVN 1.7.4 (On Windows 7, 64bit): [[[ C:\Work\WC-root>svn-1.7 update

Re: sqlite, afs and svn 1.7

2012-03-17 Thread Michael Diers
On 2012-03-15 20:06, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Matyas Selmeci wrote on Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 13:48:03 -0500: [...] >> Is there a way to turn off using Sqlite for the working copies, or >> some other way of safely using working copies on AFS? Or do we have >> to downgrade to 1.6? > > It's not possible

Re: sqlite, afs and svn 1.7

2012-03-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Matyas Selmeci wrote on Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 13:48:03 -0500: > Hi all, > > So apparently SVN 1.7 uses Sqlite to store working copy metadata. It > also uses Sqlite to store repository metadata, but only if > repo-sharing is enabled. Is that correct? > Yes, except that you me

sqlite, afs and svn 1.7

2012-03-15 Thread Matyas Selmeci
Hi all, So apparently SVN 1.7 uses Sqlite to store working copy metadata. It also uses Sqlite to store repository metadata, but only if repo-sharing is enabled. Is that correct? In our department, we use AFS for network storage. We have both our repository on it, and generally put our

AW: SVN 1.7.X Comparison

2012-03-02 Thread Markus Schaber
seem.shah...@curemd.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 2. März 2012 15:33 An: users@subversion.apache.org Betreff: SVN 1.7.X Comparison Guys Can anyone share the difference between 1.7 to all 1.7.1 1.7.2 1.7.3 and all. Versions of SVN. Cheers, Waseem Bukhari CMer - Ext: 506

SVN 1.7.X Comparison

2012-03-02 Thread Waseem Shahzad
Guys Can anyone share the difference between 1.7 to all 1.7.1 1.7.2 1.7.3 and all. Versions of SVN. Cheers, Waseem Bukhari CMer - Ext: 506

Re: SVN 1.7 cannot add symlinks that reference a directory which is an svn external

2012-01-19 Thread Stephen Butler
On Jan 17, 2012, at 16:10 , Evan Wee wrote: > How would we open a ticket for this issue? Or would Issue 4091 cover this > case? > (cc-ing users@ again) I made a test and opened a ticket, since it's a different symptom than the #4091 problem. http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: SVN 1.7 cannot add symlinks that reference a directory which is an svn external

2012-01-16 Thread Stephen Butler
On Jan 16, 2012, at 23:52 , Evan Wee wrote: > Hi, > > We have the following issue: > > SVN cannot add symlinks that reference a directory which is an svn external. > > We have these directories in SVN inside a parent directory: > > DirectoryA > DirectoryB > Code_Framework > > Code_Framework

SVN 1.7 cannot add symlinks that reference a directory which is an svn external

2012-01-16 Thread Evan Wee
Hi, We have the following issue: SVN cannot add symlinks that reference a directory which is an svn external. We have these directories in SVN inside a parent directory: DirectoryA DirectoryB Code_Framework Code_Framework has the svn:external property pointing to another location "1.2.3 http:

Re: SVN 1.7 repository + Jenkins

2011-12-06 Thread R. Cody Erben
On Dec 06, 2011, at 19:33 , Daniel Becroft wrote: > Hi, > > We're testing upgrading our SVN repositories to 1.7 format, and have noticed > something a bit strange. > > In Jenkins (1.441), I can set the SVN URL to checkout from, and it validates > whether it is correct. With a 1.7 repository, h

SVN 1.7 repository + Jenkins

2011-12-06 Thread Daniel Becroft
Hi, We're testing upgrading our SVN repositories to 1.7 format, and have noticed something a bit strange. In Jenkins (1.441), I can set the SVN URL to checkout from, and it validates whether it is correct. With a 1.7 repository, however, it doesn't seem to validate correctly (error is "/trunk/foo

Readding a file now fails instead of warning in svn 1.7

2011-12-02 Thread Patrick Mézard
ated). FWIW, "hg add" behaves like svn < 1.7. -- Patrick Mézard

Downloading Link for Ankh SVN 1.7.x for 64 Bit

2011-11-15 Thread Waseem Shahzad
Hi I am already using r Ankh SVN 1.7.x for 32 Bit. Pls refer a link for 64 Bit as I am unable to get this. Cheers,

Re: Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

2011-11-02 Thread Mark Phippard
This was fixed in the current version of Subclipse which is 1.8.2. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Mark Utting wrote: > Mark, > > Sorry to take so long to reply... > > On 22 October 2011 00:39, Mark Phippard wrote: > >> Can you make a little diagram of what your Eclipse workspace looks >> lik

Re: Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

2011-11-01 Thread Mark Utting
Mark, Sorry to take so long to reply... On 22 October 2011 00:39, Mark Phippard wrote: > Can you make a little diagram of what your Eclipse workspace looks > like? For example, one of mine looks like this: > > /workspace > |- Project1 > |-|-.svn > |- Project2 > |-|-.svn > > My Eclipse work

SVN 1.7 svn up --set-depth exclude DIR takes very long

2011-10-25 Thread christian.asmussen
I checkout a big subdirectory (more than 1giga), then I want to get rid of it locally, so I do svn up -set-depth exclude DIR It takes very long... If I strace the process, it's doing read/lseek repeatedly read(3, "\2\0\0\0\2\2\275\0\0\2\253\34\2\275\3g\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0

Re: Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

2011-10-21 Thread Mark Phippard
Can you make a little diagram of what your Eclipse workspace looks like? For example, one of mine looks like this: /workspace |- Project1 |-|-.svn |- Project2 |-|-.svn And I have others where my Eclipse workspace folder is empty: /workspace Because all of my Eclipse projects are imported

Re: Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

2011-10-21 Thread Mark Phippard
unexpectedly) gave me an > upgrade to svn 1.7. > This is on a Windows 7 64-bit Dell Latitude E6520. > $ svn --version > svn, version 1.7.0 (r1176462) >    compiled Oct 11 2011, 10:36:16 > > Since svn 1.7 was incompatible with my existing working copy, I did 'svn > upgra

Re: Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

2011-10-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
spontaneously disappears >> > sometimes? >> > Which leaves me with a useless working copy... >> > >> >> Do you have some cron job or other background process that walks around >> and randomly deletes files or directories? > > Nope. > >> &g

Re: Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

2011-10-20 Thread Mark Utting
working copy... > > > > Do you have some cron job or other background process that walks around and > randomly deletes files or directories? > Nope. > > > Since svn 1.7 was incompatible with my existing working copy, I did 'svn > > upgrade' in my top-l

Re: Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

2011-10-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
nd and randomly deletes files or directories? > Since svn 1.7 was incompatible with my existing working copy, I did 'svn > upgrade' in my top-level directory, which contains several projects from > different SVN repositories. It removed all the .svn directories in most of > th

Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

2011-10-18 Thread Mark Utting
Summary: It seems that the new top-level .svn directory spontaneously disappears sometimes? Which leaves me with a useless working copy... Details: I updated my Cygwin installation recently, which (unexpectedly) gave me an upgrade to svn 1.7. This is on a Windows 7 64-bit Dell Latitude E6520

upgrade working copy svn 1.7 from 1.6

2011-10-18 Thread umberto nensi
In file 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\entries.c' line 1692: assertion failed (base_node && !working_node && !below_working_node) === NB. All but this upgrade works perfectly. Proble

Re: svn 1.7 info MUCH slower than previous versions?

2011-10-17 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Martin Hoffesommer <3dco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'm using Microsoft Source Server > (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680641(v=vs.85).aspx) > to store source information about specific code revisions stored in > subversion. It's basica

svn 1.7 info MUCH slower than previous versions?

2011-10-17 Thread Martin Hoffesommer
Hi, I'm using Microsoft Source Server ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680641(v=vs.85).aspx) to store source information about specific code revisions stored in subversion. It's basically a bunch of perl scripts, and part of it is running a 'svn info -R ' command to get

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
sebb wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 18:05:39 +0100: > On 17 October 2011 16:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Do people who post here the error message with zero additional > > information expect support?  Or do they just do what the error message > > says without considering whether users@ is a tech su

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread sebb
On 17 October 2011 16:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Do people who post here the error message with zero additional > information expect support?  Or do they just do what the error message > says without considering whether users@ is a tech support forum or > a "Please send your crash reports here" ad

RE: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Tony Sweeney
-Original Message- From: David Chapman [mailto:dcchap...@acm.org] Sent: 17 October 2011 16:36 To: Tony Sweeney Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; ponomarenko yaroslav Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed On 10/17/2011 8:24 AM, Tony Sweeney wrote: > > > -Original Message---

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread David Chapman
On 10/17/2011 8:24 AM, Tony Sweeney wrote: -Original Message- From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] Sent: 17 October 2011 16:02 To: users@subversion.apache.org Cc: ponomarenko yaroslav Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed Am 17.10.2011 16:42, schrieb

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Do people who post here the error message with zero additional information expect support? Or do they just do what the error message says without considering whether users@ is a tech support forum or a "Please send your crash reports here" address? sebb wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 16:18:56 +010

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:24, Tony Sweeney wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] > Sent: 17 October 2011 16:02 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Cc: ponomarenko yaroslav > Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion

RE: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] > Sent: 17 October 2011 16:02 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Cc: ponomarenko yaroslav > Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed > > Am 17.10.2011 16:42, schrieb ponomarenk

RE: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Tony Sweeney
-Original Message- From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] Sent: 17 October 2011 16:02 To: users@subversion.apache.org Cc: ponomarenko yaroslav Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed Am 17.10.2011 16:42, schrieb ponomarenko yaroslav: > Got this error while try

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread sebb
On 17 October 2011 16:15, Les Mikesell wrote: > 2011/10/17 Ulrich Eckhardt : >> >>> svn: E235000: In file >>> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c' >>> line 672: assertion failed (checksum != NULL) >>> >>> win7 64 >>> Is there a way to

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Les Mikesell
2011/10/17 Ulrich Eckhardt : > >> svn: E235000: In file >> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c' >> line 672: assertion failed (checksum != NULL) >> >> win7 64 >> Is there a way to recover? > > This has been reported ad nauseam. Please

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 17.10.2011 16:42, schrieb ponomarenko yaroslav: Got this error while trying svn cleanup svn: E235000: In file 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c' line 672: assertion failed (checksum != NULL) win7 64 Is there a way to reco

svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread ponomarenko yaroslav
Got this error while trying svn cleanup svn: E235000: In file 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c' line 672: assertion failed (checksum != NULL) win7 64 Is there a way to recover?

Tortoise SVN 1.7 problem

2011-10-17 Thread Itay Zandbank
Hello. I've encountered a critical error with Tortoise SVN 1.7. Trying to commit changes, I got the following error: In file 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\lib svn_wc\wc_db.c' line 9465: assertion faile

AW: Recursion / reentrancy in SVN 1.7

2011-09-15 Thread Markus Schaber
ification handlers. This worked > > > fine using SVN 1.6, but now with SVN 1.7, some operations like > > > Checkout throw an Exception, due to the working copy database being > > > locked. > > > > > > Maybe our internal design is suboptimal

RE: Recursion / reentrancy in SVN 1.7

2011-09-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: donderdag 15 september 2011 11:28 > To: Markus Schaber > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Recursion / reentrancy in SVN 1.7 > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:41:58AM +02

Re: Recursion / reentrancy in SVN 1.7

2011-09-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:41:58AM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: > Hi, > > In our SharpSVN-based software, we happened to have recursive calls to > GetStatus inside the progress notification handlers. This worked fine > using SVN 1.6, but now with SVN 1.7, some operations like Chec

Recursion / reentrancy in SVN 1.7

2011-09-15 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, In our SharpSVN-based software, we happened to have recursive calls to GetStatus inside the progress notification handlers. This worked fine using SVN 1.6, but now with SVN 1.7, some operations like Checkout throw an Exception, due to the working copy database being locked. Maybe our

  1   2   >