Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>Anton Shepelev wrote on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:18 +0300:
>> Why can 'svn ls' show different results when invoked from
>> two working copies of the same repository?
>
>Probably because the working copy's BASE revision is different. 'svn ls'
>runs 'svn ls .@BASE' by default. If y
On 29.11.2017 18:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Anton Shepelev wrote on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:18 +0300:
>> Why can 'svn ls' show different results when invoked from
>> two working copies of the same repository?
> Probably because the working copy's BASE revision is different. 'svn ls'
> runs 'svn ls .@B
Daniel Shahaf to Anton Shepelev:
> > Why can 'svn ls' show different results when invoked
> > from two working copies of the same repository?
>
> Probably because the working copy's BASE revision is
> different. 'svn ls' runs 'svn ls .@BASE' by default.
Disregarding what is writ in the Book?
>
Anton Shepelev wrote on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:18 +0300:
> Why can 'svn ls' show different results when invoked from
> two working copies of the same repository?
Probably because the working copy's BASE revision is different. 'svn ls'
runs 'svn ls .@BASE' by default. If you pass an explicit revisio