Re: Subtree mergeinfo

2012-09-19 Thread Michael T
Varnau, Steve (Seaquest R&D hp.com> writes: > > -Original Message- [...] > > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:stsp elego.de] > > The easiest thing to do is to just leave the mergeinfo alone and upgrade > > all clients to 1.7. This will get rid of superfluous mergeinfo > > modifications durin

Re: Subtree mergeinfo

2012-09-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 05:55:27PM +0200, Michael T wrote: > Stefan, thanks for your reply.  Would a clean-up like I described (gathering > changesets from all mergeinfo from all subtrees within a branch and setting it >  all on the branch root) be even theoretically correct then, or am I being >

RE: Subtree mergeinfo

2012-09-19 Thread
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:26 AM > To: Michael T > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subtree mergeinfo > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:12:50PM +, Michael T wrote: >

RE: Subtree mergeinfo

2012-09-19 Thread Michael T
Stefan Sperling elego.de> writes: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:12:50PM +, Michael T wrote: [...] > > We have a large project with multiple branches versioned with Subversion > > (most > > of us are using 1.6 clients at the moment).  There is a lot of merging done > > between branches, and it

Re: Subtree mergeinfo

2012-09-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:12:50PM +, Michael T wrote: > Hello, > > I am aware that this is a much asked question, but since I have nonetheless > been > unable to find an answer which quite works for me I will ask it again. Feel > free to point me to a FAQ I have missed by way of answer if a