On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:06:08AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > I note that there is no libserf or serf RPM published, anywhere, for
> RHEL,
> > and it's not yet enabled for Fedora. That makes the serf libraries a bit
> > more awkw
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:06:08AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> I note that there is no libserf or serf RPM published, anywhere, for RHEL,
> and it's not yet enabled for Fedora. That makes the serf libraries a bit
> more awkward to integrate for testing. How much benefit is there in using
> s
I note that there is no libserf or serf RPM published, anywhere, for RHEL,
and it's not yet enabled for Fedora. That makes the serf libraries a bit
more awkward to integrate for testing. How much benefit is there in using
serf rether than neon for subversion-1.7.x? I'm developing a sneaking
suspic