Re: Is serf worth backporting to RHEL 5 and 6 for Subversion

2012-04-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:06:08AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > I note that there is no libserf or serf RPM published, anywhere, for > RHEL, > > and it's not yet enabled for Fedora. That makes the serf libraries a bit > > more awkw

Re: Is serf worth backporting to RHEL 5 and 6 for Subversion

2012-04-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:06:08AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > I note that there is no libserf or serf RPM published, anywhere, for RHEL, > and it's not yet enabled for Fedora. That makes the serf libraries a bit > more awkward to integrate for testing. How much benefit is there in using > s

Is serf worth backporting to RHEL 5 and 6 for Subversion

2012-04-20 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I note that there is no libserf or serf RPM published, anywhere, for RHEL, and it's not yet enabled for Fedora. That makes the serf libraries a bit more awkward to integrate for testing. How much benefit is there in using serf rether than neon for subversion-1.7.x? I'm developing a sneaking suspic