Re: Expected performance

2013-07-10 Thread Philip Martin
"Naumenko, Roman" writes: > On 2013/07/10 9:41 AM, Philip Martin wrote: >> "Naumenko, Roman" writes: >>> That box has more than enough CPUs (forty), cores are barely utilized. >> Subversion's default cache configuration is very conservative. >> Increasing the cache size can reduce disk IO and im

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-10 Thread Naumenko, Roman
On 2013/07/10 9:41 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > "Naumenko, Roman" writes: >> That box has more than enough CPUs (forty), cores are barely utilized. > Subversion's default cache configuration is very conservative. > Increasing the cache size can reduce disk IO and improve performance: > > http://subv

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-10 Thread Philip Martin
"Naumenko, Roman" writes: > That box has more than enough CPUs (forty), cores are barely utilized. Subversion's default cache configuration is very conservative. Increasing the cache size can reduce disk IO and improve performance: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#server

Re: Expected performance (svn+ssh)

2013-07-10 Thread Naumenko, Roman
On 2013/07/08 5:10 PM, Thomas Harold wrote: > On 7/8/2013 2:18 PM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: >> >> That box has more than enough CPUs (forty), cores are barely utilized. >> How is the access over ssh can be configured? I thought it's only >> http(s) or svn proto. > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/s

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-09 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:33:03 +, Andy Levy wrote: > >> I just checked out 2400 files, about 1.7GB, and it took just over 19 minutes. >> >> Client I/O speed is a big factor (7200RPM hard drive w/ NTFS in my case). > > 9550 Files, half a GB wc

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-09 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Andreas Krey, am Dienstag, 9. Juli 2013 um 11:02 schrieben Sie: > the machine now under my desk > writes a tree of 10 files and 7GB in about a minute (that is > not an svn checkout). And that's the hardware I wanted to read about, there surely is some advanced RAID or SSD used and n

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-09 Thread Andreas Krey
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:52:22 +, Thorsten Schöning wrote: ... > am Dienstag, 9. Juli 2013 um 07:31 schrieben Sie: > > > 9550 Files, half a GB wc size, 15 seconds. > > > You may want to use another file system? > > Or your hardware and connection to your repo with it's server etc. I > vote for

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-09 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Andreas Krey, am Dienstag, 9. Juli 2013 um 07:31 schrieben Sie: > 9550 Files, half a GB wc size, 15 seconds. > You may want to use another file system? Or your hardware and connection to your repo with it's server etc. I vote for the latter and claim that you didn't mention little deta

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:06:45 +, Naumenko, Roman wrote: ... > For example, on one of the other servers it takes 12-13 min to checkout > repo with ~17000 files, total size 1.2G (with average speed 2MB/s). > > Is it considered good, bad or total disaster in term of svn performance? To me this l

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:33:03 +, Andy Levy wrote: > I just checked out 2400 files, about 1.7GB, and it took just over 19 minutes. > > Client I/O speed is a big factor (7200RPM hard drive w/ NTFS in my case). 9550 Files, half a GB wc size, 15 seconds. You may want to use another file system?

Re: Expected performance (svn+ssh)

2013-07-08 Thread Thomas Harold
On 7/8/2013 2:18 PM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: That box has more than enough CPUs (forty), cores are barely utilized. How is the access over ssh can be configured? I thought it's only http(s) or svn proto. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.basic.in-action.html#svn.advanced.reposurls http:/

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: > On 2013/07/08 2:33 PM, Andy Levy wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Naumenko, Roman >> wrote: >>> On 2013/07/08 12:51 PM, Andy Levy wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: > Hello, > > Ho

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Naumenko, Roman
On 2013/07/08 2:33 PM, Andy Levy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Naumenko, Roman > wrote: >> On 2013/07/08 12:51 PM, Andy Levy wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman >>> wrote: Hello, How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: > > > There are certainly a lot of variables. I'm just trying to find out some > baseline. > > For example, on one of the other servers it takes 12-13 min to checkout > repo with ~17000 files, total size 1.2G (with average speed 2MB/s). > > Is

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: > On 2013/07/08 12:51 PM, Andy Levy wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one below? >>> Considering eveyrthing on the server f

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: > On 2013/07/08 2:06 PM, Thomas Harold wrote: >> On 7/8/2013 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one >>> below? Considering eveyrthing on the server functioning as

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Naumenko, Roman
On 2013/07/08 2:06 PM, Thomas Harold wrote: > On 7/8/2013 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: >> Hello, >> >> How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one >> below? Considering eveyrthing on the server functioning as expected. >> > Our bottleneck is usually the CPU, but we're do

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Naumenko, Roman
On 2013/07/08 12:51 PM, Andy Levy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one below? >> Considering eveyrthing on the server functioning as expected. >> >> Apache 2.2.3 >> >> 128G mem >> 10

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Thomas Harold
On 7/8/2013 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: Hello, How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one below? Considering eveyrthing on the server functioning as expected. Our bottleneck is usually the CPU, but we're doing svn+ssh access. So I lean towards a few less but mo

Re: Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: > Hello, > > How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one below? > Considering eveyrthing on the server functioning as expected. > > Apache 2.2.3 > > 128G mem > 10G > FSFS is local storage. I don't see how this can b

Expected performance

2013-07-08 Thread Naumenko, Roman
Hello, How fast would you expect svn checkout to be from a server like one below? Considering eveyrthing on the server functioning as expected. Apache 2.2.3 128G mem 10G FSFS is local storage. Thanks, --Roman Naumenko ___ Thi