> > I'm attempting to diagnose the cause of a corrupted revision file. It
was
> > created with mod_dav_svn 1.7.5 and has the following top few lines:
>
> With version of APR was the httpd server using at the time?
APR 1.4.6
APRUTIL 1.4.1
HTTPD 2.2.22
>
> > 000: 4445 4c54 410a 0004 02
I'm attempting to diagnose the cause of a corrupted revision file. It was
created with mod_dav_svn 1.7.5 and has the following top few lines:
000: 4445 4c54 410a 0004 0200 0012 5356 DELTA.SV
010: 4e01 86a0 0005 8498 3404 8086 a000 N.4.
020: 86a0 0078 5e
> > I've observed 3 instances of similar errors when using the 1.8.5
svnadmin
> > verify on 3 different old repositories. (the hundreds of other repos
on
> > this server verified in 1.8.5 without problems.)
> >
> > svnadmin: E160004: r97's root node's predecessor is r90 but should be
r96
> > s
I've observed 3 instances of similar errors when using the 1.8.5 svnadmin
verify on 3 different old repositories. (the hundreds of other repos on
this server verified in 1.8.5 without problems.)
svnadmin: E160004: r97's root node's predecessor is r90 but should be r96
svnadmin: E160004: r502's ro
dlel...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on 08/14/2013 01:13:52 PM:
> > I'm not sure that current SVN users accept problems with depth !=
> > infinity as much as they arrange their layout so they don't have to do
> > that. What's a common use case for needing some disjoint arrangement
> > of components
Bob Archer wrote on 08/01/2013 09:02:32 AM:
> > We are using subversion 1.7 which is hosted in linux and apache
isbeing used
> > along with this.
> > The linux is very powerful but we are facing a major issue during the
SVN
> > operation from the windows system.
> > Windows system : Microsoft wi
> I tried in the same server where svn is hosted but there also it is
> taking too much of time I e it is taking 110 mins to checkout the
> 2200 Mbytes of data(in Windows it took 143 mins).
How many files are in the working copy? For example, millions of small
files can take a significant amoun
on, you can use the svnmucc
utility to "overwrite" an existing file, even with the same contents:
svnmucc put test.txt http://server/kmr_test/trunk/foo/test.txt -m"Add
file"
r479 committed by kmradke at 2013-05-03T17:36:00.823078Z
svnmucc put test.txt http://server/kmr_test/trunk/fo
> >> >>> > I actually started a migration with svnsync so that I didn't
have to
> >> >>> > worry about network issues related to transferring a single
> 36GB file on an
> >> >>> > unreliable network. But I ran into this issue: Cannot
> accept non-LF line
> >> >>> > endings in 'svn:log' property
André Hänsel wrote on 02/04/2013 01:08:59 PM:
> I am trying to deny a user access to a certain path in an SVN
repository.
[snip]
> This is my current authz-test file, which is unable to stop user "andre"
> from accessing the directory "test2" and its content:
>
> [/]
> * = rw
If you d
> I manage a Subversion server that has the following configuration :
> - SVN 1.6.9
> - FSFS storage mode
> - Apache + mod_dav + subversion modules
> - Linux Suse Enterprise Edition 32-bit
>
> On this SVN server, there are around 1100 SVN repositories for
> around 2000 users. I have small reposit
> I have not tried it, but couldn't you do this easier by using the
> Apache piped logs feature? Just send the log entries via a pipe to
> a script that filters out any entries you do not want in the log. I
> am not positive, but your script might even be able to write the
> entries you filter
I've always been slightly annoyed with Apache 401 "unauthorized" log
entries
when accessing a Subversion repository. I realize these are part of the
standard authentication "handshake" via the http protocol.
(Always ask anonymously first...)
I also realize that mod_dav_svn can now provide a cust
CHAZAL Julien wrote on 09/07/2012 10:12:32 AM:
> I manage a Subversion server (SVN 1.6.9, FSFS storage mode, set up
> on a Linux Suse Enterprise Edition) and I usually encounter a
> problem when my users commit a set of folders which the size is morethan
4 GB.
>
> The error message that appear
> > I was about to ask if svnsync would get access denied errors... but I
did
> > another test which, I think, answered my own question: If I run "svn
log"
> > against a repository to which I have only access to part of, revs in
the
> > areas I don't have access to will show up as "(no author)
> > I had a problem with the IE behaving very strange when trying to
download MS
> > Office documents (docx, xlsx) from a subversion server; it downloaded
them
> > as zip files instead. The fix was to add the subversion server to the
> > trusted sites in the IE settings: Tools->Internet Options,
> We have the following problem in using Subversion (currently version
1.6.15):
> I open the Windows Internet Explorer 8.0
> I enter there the URL to our Subversion repository: https://
> our.company.com/svn/REPO/trunk/docs
> I have to login with my credentials (user ID and password).
> I am able
> strace seems to indicate I/O issues as the bottleneck. The file is
> loaded from NFS without caching.
>
> The per-repository access file seems like my best bet for an immediate
> solution. It is example 4 in this config:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/
> mod_aut
Mark,
> I've been attempting to compile Subversion on Windows (64-bit). I've
been
> able to solve most of the issues I had when compiling, but there's just
one
> file left that is refusing to compile - libsvn_ra-1.dll.
> The build environment is Visual Studio 2008 on Windows 7 64-bit, using
the
> >> It might already be fixed: I see a leak with 1.7.x@r1293812 but
r1293813
> >> appears to fix it.
> >
> > Definitely not fixed, at least for https:// externals. This is what I
> > did:
>
> I see small memory growth during checkout. I see much larger memory
> growth for a second checkout o
> > Has anyone else noticed a client memory leak when using
> > svn:externals in the 1.7.3 client?
> >
> > We have a large project with tens of thousands of externals.
> > When checked out with a 1.6 client, it uses 150MB of memory.
> > When checked out with a 1.7 client it uses >1.5GB of memory.
>
> > Has anyone else noticed a client memory leak when using
> > svn:externals in the 1.7.3 client?
> >
> > We have a large project with tens of thousands of externals.
> > When checked out with a 1.6 client, it uses 150MB of memory.
> > When checked out with a 1.7 client it uses >1.5GB of memory.
>
All,
Has anyone else noticed a client memory leak when using
svn:externals in the 1.7.3 client?
We have a large project with tens of thousands of externals.
When checked out with a 1.6 client, it uses 150MB of memory.
When checked out with a 1.7 client it uses >1.5GB of memory.
Same memory issue
> Stefan Sperling wrote on 12/06/2011 12:45:36 PM:
> > > How would I get the uuid's. We have the dump, but I believe that
> > is it. Can the uuids be obtained from them, would it be simpler to
> > just have everyone do a new checkout?
> >
> > The UUID is somewhere near the top of the dump file
Stefan Sperling wrote on 12/06/2011 12:45:36 PM:
> > How would I get the uuid's. We have the dump, but I believe that
> is it. Can the uuids be obtained from them, would it be simpler to
> just have everyone do a new checkout?
>
> The UUID is somewhere near the top of the dump file in a line th
Mike Cepek wrote on 08/11/2011 12:07:44 PM:
> > Not "sufficient" because it takes time and manual work to do? Or,
> because it doesn't do what you need?
>
> Taking 97 minutes to pull 25 GB from all the tags/ and branches/ is
> unacceptable when it takes only 3 minutes to pull the 660 MB we
> a
IE7/8 do not like to correctly "open" MS office .docx files served
directly
from a svn repo with the default svn mime type. They will only allow you
to save them since it determines they are zip files.
The obvious solution is to just add the correct svn:mime-type, which works
fine, although it r
Phil Pinkerton wrote on 07/26/2011 09:35:02 AM:
> Are there any know issues with regards to moving Repositories from one
> platform to another ?
>
> Will the old Repositories maintain their current SVN revision ?
>
> Current platform Sun Solaris 10: SVN 1.6.5
> Target platform Red Hat Enterprise
Daniel Shahaf wrote on 06/30/2011 09:24:56 AM:
> kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 09:06:28
-0500:
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on 06/30/2011 07:35:36
AM:
> > > I'm going to say this even more clearly:
> > >
> > > If you backup a repository by copying its files while a serve
Daniel Shahaf wrote on 06/30/2011 07:35:36 AM:
> I'm going to say this even more clearly:
>
> If you backup a repository by copying its files while a server is
> running, the backup may be created corrupted.
>
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7#single-db (sic)
This does not s
Bruno Antunes wrote on 06/16/2011 06:05:13 PM:
>
> As part of the work of my PhD thesis I need to load the ASF
> Subversion repository into my own local repository in order to mine
> and extract information from the repository without overloading the
> ASF servers.
>
> I have downloaded the r
EJ Ciramella wrote on 05/03/2011 12:23:57 PM:
> The previous installation (the one running 1.4.X) was all on 32 bit
> hardware (and obviously software).
>
> The new hardware is 64-bit capable, but I?ve yet to track down the
> compatible 64-bit svn binaries.
>
> I think also this is a memory le
EJ Ciramella wrote on 05/03/2011 09:44:07 AM:
> I?ve been struggling to keep a Subversion server (1.6.16) running
> via Apache (2.2.17).
>
> Every so often, it seems that the svn server crashes. Initially, we
> upgraded to SVN 1.6.12 and things would crash regularly every week.
> Restarting br
"Bert Huijben" wrote on 04/28/2011 01:18:09 PM:
> > On 4/28/11 9:42 AM, Danil Shopyrin wrote:
> > >> are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that
you
> > drive
> > >> a Windows shop)
> > >> ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit.
> > >
> > > It's also very importan
David Brodbeck wrote on 04/26/2011 06:07:13 PM:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Alan M. Evans
wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:18 -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> > "Alan M. Evans" wrote on 04/26/2011 04:54:37 PM:
> > >
> > > > I've found using "*" to be non intuitive. Try:
> > >
"Alan M. Evans" wrote on 04/26/2011 04:54:37 PM:
>
> > I've found using "*" to be non intuitive. Try:
> >
> > [/]
> > $authenticated=rw
> > jon=
>
> Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, jon still has full access...
Does order matter? I think the first match wins:
[/]
jon=
$authenticat
"Alan M. Evans" wrote on 04/26/2011 04:26:27 PM:
> Sorry for what must be a simple question; I've googled around and
> read/followed all the examples and docs I can find. There is apparently
> something fundamental that I'm misunderstanding.
>
> Server is running CentOS 5, Subversion 1.6.15, Apac
Bob Archer wrote on 04/22/2011 09:39:03 AM:
>
> > in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows.
>
> Why? We are a windows "shop" and we have windows servers and we host
> on windows. I've seen zero problems. I think this type of anti-ms
> FUD is going to be bad for svn if
> > I looked everywhere for this info and I have not foud it.
> >
> > I am quiting trying to control access with LDAP groups but I am
> > keeping the authentication.
> >
> > So, I decided to use the AuthzSVNAccessFile directive to make groups
> > and control the access to some repos, projects and
Nuno Carapeto wrote on 02/18/2011 12:19:39 PM:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 2/17/11 12:50 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> I have so SVN repos (subversion) and I use them with no proble. But
> when we do updates/commints on client (tortoise) we always get teh
> internal direc
Robin wrote on 02/05/2011 03:00:50 AM:
> Reporting a strange incident, one of my subdirectories disappeared from
the
> repository entirely. When I do a Show Log, I could not see the
> folder was even
> added or deleted.
>
> I had weekly backups so I able to restore and compare them.
>
> - M
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote on 01/20/2011 02:26:02 PM:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on 12/16/2010 03:11:03 PM:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:50:27PM -0600, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
wrote:
> > > I have observed some regressions with
> > >
> > > log -v -g --xml http://server/repo/path
> > >
Stefan Sperling wrote on 12/16/2010 03:11:03 PM:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:50:27PM -0600, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
wrote:
> > I have observed some regressions with
> >
> > log -v -g --xml http://server/repo/path
> >
> > output in 1.6.15 that were not present in 1.6.13. I see a lot of -
"Curley, John" wrote on 01/11/2011 12:03:46
AM:
> There seems to be a 2 GB file size limit, if you use the default
> command to commit. We encountered this problem and eventually found
> the solution.
>
> This is not a Subversion limit, nor is it an Apache limit.
I believe this is only a limi
Stefan Sperling wrote on 12/16/2010 03:11:03 PM:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:50:27PM -0600, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
wrote:
> > I have observed some regressions with
> >
> > log -v -g --xml http://server/repo/path
> >
> > output in 1.6.15 that were not present in 1.6.13. I see a lot of -
I have observed some regressions with
log -v -g --xml http://server/repo/path
output in 1.6.15 that were not present in 1.6.13. I see a lot of -g
changes
in this new version.
The client sees:
svn: REPORT of '/repo/!svn/bc/1234/path/in/repo': Could not read chunk
size: connection was closed
Daniel Shahaf wrote on 11/10/2010 10:35:16 AM:
> > I finally wrote a simple script to remove dead transactions older than
1
> > week. It worked
> > great, but there appears to be a few old TXNs that are somehow
> > corrupted/malformed.
> >
> > Any issues with just going into the fsfs db/tran
I finally wrote a simple script to remove dead transactions older than 1
week. It worked
great, but there appears to be a few old TXNs that are somehow
corrupted/malformed.
Any issues with just going into the fsfs db/transactions directory and
removing
the offending named directory manually?
Patricia A Moss wrote on 11/09/2010 09:41:42 AM:
> From: Patricia A Moss
> To: kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Date: 11/09/2010 09:41 AM
> Subject: Re: locking down access to a repository
>
>
> >I don't think you want the "Require valid-user" line, since by
> d
Stefan Sperling wrote on 11/09/2010 08:34:37 AM:
> > I've configured my ldap aliases as follows:
> >
> > AuthLDAPBindDN FCGNET\svnuser
> > AuthLDAPBindPassword x
> > AuthLDAPURL
> > ldap://xx.fcg.com:3268/DC=fcg,DC=com?samAccountName?sub?
> > (objectCategory=p
Johan Corveleyn wrote on 10/29/2010 08:43:26 AM:
> > In the Apache SSL error log on the server the corresponding message
is:
> >
> > [Fri Oct 29 13:10:15 2010] [error] [client ] Provider
> > encountered an error while streaming a REPORT response. [500, #0]
> >
> > [Fri Oct 29 13:10:15 2010] [err
> One good way to copy the repository would be to "svnadmin dump" on
> the production server and "svnadmin load" on the test server. This
> would automatically upgrade the repository to the latest most
> efficient format.
Don't forget this dump/load process will not copy hook scripts and
locked
Ravi Roy wrote on 06/07/2010 12:22:52 AM:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Ryan Schmidt
> wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 00:01, Ravi Roy wrote:
>
> > Just curious if there is a way out to set auto-props for certain
> binary files on server side ?
> No, there isn't, not a supported way, anyway.
BD wrote on 05/10/2010 09:52:39 AM:
> Thats a very interesting way of looking at this problem. It does
> make sense that multiple commit processes coming from the same
> machine really wouldnt be that different from the question I was
> asking. I guess from here I'll have to do some testing som
west alto wrote on 03/22/2010 11:21:12 AM:
> Any one tried High Availability with subversion, using Apache,
> Heartbeat and NFS? Is this possible? any problems encountered?
>
> My requirement doesn't need to be load balance, I just want that when
> my primary subversion server is down my secondar
Bob Archer wrote on 03/03/2010 04:42:49 PM:
> > Bob Archer wrote on 03/03/2010 03:15:22 PM:
> > > > David Darj wrote:
> > > > > My plan was to build (for a start) what's included in the
> > > > > svn-win32-1.6.x.zip,
> > > > >
> > > > > Win32 binaries (svn, svnadmin, svnserve, svnmucc, etc...) bo
Bob Archer wrote on 03/03/2010 03:15:22 PM:
> > David Darj wrote:
> > > My plan was to build (for a start) what's included in the
> > > svn-win32-1.6.x.zip,
> > >
> > > Win32 binaries (svn, svnadmin, svnserve, svnmucc, etc...) both dor
BDB
> > > and FSFS, including OpenSSL
> > > Modules for Apach
"Troy Simpson" wrote on 03/01/2010 08:44:54 PM:
> I can still build the installer, but I have never built binaries.
> The installer code in the repository is NOT the latest code. I had
> lost commit access for a time during the transition and by the time
> I got that access back there are no
Kevin Longfellow wrote on 02/02/2010 03:15:19 PM:
> I've been looking at a space utilization issue and am a bit
> confused. Just looking at the size of the revisions in the db/revs
> directory and only looking at the 2.2M size revs I see about 3GB+ of
> disk space consumed just for Feb 2:
>
> l
59 matches
Mail list logo
