I thought it
also made sense to investigate opportunities for fixes from the svn side.
In my view, empty revprops should not cause svnsync to fail this way.
Best regards,
Fredrik
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Fredrik Orderud >
:date revision properties does not break svnsync?
Thanks in advance,
Fredrik Orderud
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Yes, go ahead and file an issue, and include links to this and the other
> mail thread in the description.
>
> At this point, I am not sure whether I'd call it a defect or an
> enhancement request (asking for a new optional strict mode for
.7.6 (VisualSVN 2.5.6, Apache 2.2.22) on Win
server 2008 R2.
Thanks in advance,
Fredrik Orderud
Index: Test.cpp
===
--- Test.cpp(revision 0)
+++ Test.cpp(revision 1)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+First line
Index: Test
ction (e.g. from old to newer release branch)?
Does the “reintegrate” + “record only” merge procedure extend
gracefully to scenarios with arbitrary cyclic/bidirectional merging
between several parallel branches?
Thanks in advance,
Fredrik Orderud
